Hello from Mpls. Minnesota.
I bought a KLR650 in 2000. After riding a short time I found out my
back can't take it anymore. (43 years old and I guess I'm going to be
stuck on my Goldwing from here on out).
When I bought mine I looked high and low for a decent used one in
this area with no luck.
This one is nice.
If anyone knows someone looking they can E-mail me for specs.
Thanks,
Don
mounting ims-6.6 gallon tank nklr
-
- Posts: 211
- Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2003 5:19 am
guess i'm to old to play rough now
Two words Don: Ad vil
Works miracles.
Guy
59
A16
Richmond, VA
-------Original Message-------
From: forty5_acp
Sent: 04/03/03 01:48 PM
To: DSN_klr650@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [DSN_klr650] Guess I'm to old to play rough now
I bought a KLR650 in 2000. After riding a short time I found out my back can't take it anymore. (43 years old and I guess I'm going to be stuck on my Goldwing from here on out).
-
- Posts: 195
- Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2000 6:52 pm
guess i'm to old to play rough now
In a message dated 04/03/03 10:51:39, donshore7@... writes:
(43 years old and I guess I'm going to be stuck on my Goldwing from here on
out).
43!!! Dude, I'm 53 and am considering a Wing because I'm wondering if my
knees will last
the life of another KLR650.
My current KLR just went over 50K miles. The one I had before that went 65K
before it
started showing smoke. I'm due for another bike within a year. I put about
10K miles on it a year.
I'm looking for a full dress cruser, Hardlyableson's are just too heavy, the
Wing's are too,
but have that low CG. I prefer the earlyer models of the Wings as the newer
ones are
just too wide in the saddle. I was considering what Kawasaki has to offer.
Any opinions?
Viewed best
in the text font
'Courier'
___
/___\
(!* *!)
__\^-^/__
/ ___ \
_/ |___| \_
(__\=/ \=/__)
O=|_[ ]_|=O
\.---./
| = = |
| =.-.= |
!_|| ||_!
=|| ||=
<| |>
| |
| |
_____`-'_____
Wish I could go through life
like I go through traffic
guess i'm to old to play rough now
Several, lighter bikes have more leg room than a wing. Honda's own ST1300, yamaha's FJR1300 has even more. I too was considering a wing for my LD travels butt, the two examples have about convinced me otherwise. Both are lighter, faster, more comfortable, can haul just as much, and most importanly, CHEAPER. With the difference you could almost have a another bike, like a KLR! Good Luck, Mark Hanke> > 43!!! Dude, I'm 53 and am considering a Wing because I'm wondering if my > knees will last > the life of another KLR650. >
-
- Posts: 1442
- Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2003 7:59 pm
guess i'm to old to play rough now
Typically if anyone is going to complain about comfort on a goldwing it will
be those of us with bad knees. Something about those cylinder heads being in
the way of where you want to place your foot to relax the knee.
Compared to my Venture Royale, the cylinder heads on the Honda crowd my toes.
The cylinder heads make for highway pegs that give a feeling like I'm sitting
on this big fat barrel. And given the new Wings are over 800 pounds wet while
my 85 Venture is only 670 pounds I don't think my knee wants to get anywhere
near a Goldwing.
If you are looking at a full dress touring rig the other options are the
Kawasaki Voyager - while the design is as old as the KLR, in the late 80's it
was one of the best touring bikes made, even better than the 1200 Wings.
While compared to modern bikes it may not handle as well, but as the
magazines say, you have to reach those speeds at which no sane person should
ride a big touring bike to reach the point that the handling differences show
up. The Yamaha Royale Star Venture - pure cruiser style, and it has looks
that many say are more pleasing than an HD. Its got a 1300cc v-four engine
that produces more than ample HP and torque for two-up touring. This is the
same engine that is my older VR and folks are getting 200,000+ miles off that
engine.
Used full baggers: you will get your best bang for the buck by buying into a
1200cc, flat 4 Gold Wing. Enough were sold that the after market can provide
every part you may need, with a lot of the pricey electronic parts crossing
over to automotive equivalents. And there is my old Venture Royale. As long
as you find one that has been cared for these are GREAT bikes. Its claim to
fame is the engine, which was used as the base of the V-Max. You don't want a
fixer upper ones of these as you'll be working off of parts bikes. The VR was
built from 83-93. In 86 the engine went from a 1200 to a 1300.
Pat
G'ville, NV
In a message dated 2003-04-05 3:18:04 AM Pacific Standard Time,
MHANKE@... writes:
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]> > > > > >43!!! Dude, I'm 53 and am considering a Wing because I'm wondering if my > >knees will last > >the life of another KLR650. > > > > Several, lighter bikes have more leg room than a wing. > Honda's own ST1300, yamaha's FJR1300 has even more. > I too was considering a wing for my LD travels butt, the > two examples have about convinced me otherwise. Both > are lighter, faster, more comfortable, can haul just as much, > and most importanly, CHEAPER. With the difference you > could almost have a another bike, like a KLR! > Good Luck, > Mark Hanke > > >
-
- Posts: 581
- Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2001 8:42 pm
mounting ims-6.6 gallon tank nklr
Sorry Gijs..........just a silly-ass American political wisecrack. Never
mind.
Hey, that sounds like a big trip! I see why you'd want the IMS tank.
Did you get the thing on alright?
The Mule
----- Original Message ----- From: "Gijs Walenkamp" To: Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2003 5:16 AM Subject: Re: [DSN_klr650] Mounting IMS-6.6 Gallon tank NKLR > Who is Tom Ridge ?? > I plan on riding the Panamericana next year, increased range compared to 12 > litres (KLR650C - european version). > Regards > Gijs.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests