----- Original Message ----- From: yd3@nvc.net Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 1:43 PM To: John Patterson; MG-TABC Subject: Re: [mg-tabc] RED LINE WATER WETTER John: P.S. A 30% solution actually transferes heat better than a 50% solution even though a 50% solution has a higher boiling point. Blake Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
RED LINE WATER WETTER
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Sun Jun 02, 2002 6:00 pm
Re: RED LINE WATER WETTER
This is an interesting comment, since my car runs too hot (at least or my comfort). Do you mean that the latent heat lost due to water evaporation accounts for the better cooling, as it most certainly could? If so, this means one has to rely on the water evaporating from the system in order to get a lower running temperature. This in turn requires one to take along extra water(and an "asbestos" glove) to keep rediluting the antifreeze as the water boils away and the running temperature gradually increases to the running temperature of the 50/50 mix(or above?).
Hopefully, the improved heat conductivity of the higher water content mixture does not require more evaporation (in a non-pressurized system) to achieve the end sought. Presumably, the water wetter product also helps heat conductvity.
Art McKenna TC6999
-
- Posts: 165
- Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 10:55 pm
Re: RED LINE WATER WETTER
The water wetter from Redline makes the water "cling" to the metal better,
assisting heat transfer and increasing efficiency. It doesn't fix worn and
broken parts. Radiators are water/air intercoolers. Evaporation of the
coolant doesn't have much effect.......
Best,
Ray
----- Original Message ----- From: "Arthur McKenna" ALMcKenna3@msn.com> To: yd3@nvc.net>; "John Patterson" jwp_mgtc@chartermi.net>; "MG-TABC" mg-tabc@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 3:46 PM Subject: Re: [mg-tabc] RED LINE WATER WETTER > This is an interesting comment, since my car runs too hot (at least or my comfort). Do you mean that the latent heat lost due to water evaporation accounts for the better cooling, as it most certainly could? If so, this means one has to rely on the water evaporating from the system in order to get a lower running temperature. This in turn requires one to take along extra water(and an "asbestos" glove) to keep rediluting the antifreeze as the water boils away and the running temperature gradually increases to the running temperature of the 50/50 mix(or above?). > Hopefully, the improved heat conductivity of the higher water content mixture does not require more evaporation (in a non-pressurized system) to achieve the end sought. Presumably, the water wetter product also helps heat conductvity. > Art McKenna TC6999 > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: yd3@nvc.net > Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 1:43 PM > To: John Patterson; MG-TABC > Subject: Re: [mg-tabc] RED LINE WATER WETTER > > John: > > P.S. A 30% solution actually transferes heat better than a 50% solution > even though a 50% solution has a higher boiling point. > > Blake > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > >
-
- Posts: 60
- Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2001 3:05 am
RED LINE WATER WETTER
hi friends
probably i am a bit late with my suggestions concerning water wetter?
i tried that some years ago -- and can say, the only effect that this
product
causes is the missing 10 bucks in your pocket!
better you buy a bunch of flowers for your wifes --
that is better for you
walter
________________________________________________________________________
Walter Prechsl
Kappel cker 10
74182 Obersulm, Germany walter@publi-consult.com

-
- Posts: 233
- Joined: Thu Dec 25, 2008 3:02 pm
Re: RED LINE WATER WETTER
In a message dated 6/29/02 08:51:29 Pacific Daylight Time,
walter@publi-consult.com writes:
>
Here is an interesting real world experience that I had with water wetter
just last week. While driving my TA to GoF West (about 2400 miles round
trip), the average water temp was 82 degrees C on the flat, on uphills it
would climb to 90, the settle back to 82 while going down hill or back to the
flat.....after extensive running abouve 6500 feet, We experienced a lot of
water loss due to the decreased vapor pressure. This required frequent
replinishment. I normally run Napacool and water, no antifreeze. Napacool
is used extensively by the trucking industry and is an anti-corrosive. I
don't believe it has any suface tension reduction properties like water
wetter. Well, anyway, after we got to Salt Lake City where is was 97 degrees
F, I stopped in a store and bought some generic water wetter, looks just like
the Redline stuff. Threw in about 1/2 the bottle and topped off the rad.
Next day while running through the salt flats at 100 degrees, my water temp
was averaging 85 degrees C........so much for water wetter........this is the
second time I've tried this stuff with out noticing any difference.
The old TA ran flawlessly through out the great adventure......
Terry
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests