Yesterday the wife's BMW started kicking and rocking after starting up,
we had been driving
it on and off all day, shi$ another trip to the BMW dealer! Called AAA
for the tow and the
driver convinced both wife and me that there was 'condesation' in the
gas tank and we need
to get some of the 'HEET' stuff to clean it up, he had said that
numerous calls recently in TX
, very rainy last few days, followed by heat, would cause the issue,
well it didn't fix it at all.
I had never heard of this issue except in winter, real cold with the
condensation freezing?
Opinions?
Thaks!
after market pipe...bottom-line
-
- Posts: 294
- Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2005 10:10 am
non klr-car
It's possible to get water in the gas any time of year, though
water-in-the-tank freezing in the winter is more common.
I would think with all the ethanol in today's gasoline that there'd never be
any water left (that's all the HEET stuff is, alcohol either in methanol or
ethanol form).
Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com [mailto:DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Jim Douglas
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 8:05 AM
To: DSN _KLR650
Subject: [DSN_KLR650] NON KLR-Car
Yesterday the wife's BMW started kicking and rocking after starting up, we
had been driving it on and off all day, shi$ another trip to the BMW dealer!
Called AAA for the tow and the driver convinced both wife and me that there
was 'condesation' in the gas tank and we need to get some of the 'HEET'
stuff to clean it up, he had said that numerous calls recently in TX , very
rainy last few days, followed by heat, would cause the issue, well it didn't
fix it at all.
I had never heard of this issue except in winter, real cold with the
condensation freezing?
Opinions?
Thaks!
-
- Posts: 3355
- Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2001 3:37 pm
non klr-car
Not able to say if it is or not, but can say my preferred additive
for moisture in fuel is "NOX ICE" (used to be in a black bottle) HEET
maybe if nothing else is available.
Seen NOX ICE at Carquest, Advance Auto Parts and guessing most Napa
dealers carry it.
Dooden
A15 Green Ape
--- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, Jim Douglas
wrote:
up,> > Yesterday the wife's BMW started kicking and rocking after starting
AAA> we had been driving > it on and off all day, shi$ another trip to the BMW dealer! Called
the> for the tow and the > driver convinced both wife and me that there was 'condesation' in
issue,> gas tank and we need > to get some of the 'HEET' stuff to clean it up, he had said that > numerous calls recently in TX > , very rainy last few days, followed by heat, would cause the
the> well it didn't fix it at all. > I had never heard of this issue except in winter, real cold with
> condensation freezing? > > Opinions? > > Thaks! >
-
- Posts: 115
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 12:08 pm
after market pipe...bottom-line
Every after-market pipe suggests (if not requires) rejetting to
larger jets. Primarily, this is the reason for any performance gain:
more fuel (maybe 1 to 4 hp?). But we're talking mpg/efficiency here
vs. power gain as the reason/catalyst for changing the exhaust. If
you want raw power gain, well then, I strongly suggest NO2--a nitrous
oxide system.
Increasing the jet sizes adds more fuel and perhaps power...NOT
efficiency. Furthermore, I suspect with a new throaty sound
and "feeling" of more power (think crotch rocket), it's likely the
rider will apply more often more throttle than is necessary. As
you're about to learn (or re-acquaint yourself with), the faster you
go on the highway (adding notable increase in wind resistance) the
WORSE your fuel economy becomes.
The power required to overcome aerodynamic drag is given by:
P(d) = F(d) * v = 1/2 pv^3AC(d)
The power needed to push an object through a fluid increases as the
cube of the velocity. A car cruising on a highway at 50 mph (80 km/h)
may require only 10 horsepower (7.5 kW) to overcome air drag, but
that same car at 100 mph (160 km/h) requires 80 hp (60 kW). With a
doubling of speed the drag (force) quadruples per the formula.
Exerting four times the force over a fixed distance produces four
times as much work. At twice the speed the work (resulting in
displacement over a fixed distance) is done twice as fast. Since
power is the rate of doing work, four times the work done in half the
time requires eight times the power.
Bottom-line: I would not recommend changing the exhaust for fuel
economy. I would recommend changing it if you like: the sound, look
and/or weight-savings offered by a particular unit. Power gain is so
negligible, it's not worth the $400+ cost, added maintenance, or
louder sound in my opinion. Also, you have to consider the life-
cycle cost of the replacement exhaust which [with non-mechanical
baffles rated USFS-approved] requires periodic maintenance (time +
material) repacking the baffles every 1.5k-2k miles.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests