nklr: a posting question
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 8:01 pm
lowering links, 4 inches?
Hi all;
I need a little advise. A fellow at work is interested in buying my
KLR, but he feels it is too tall. He being a machinist, we worked out
some new lowering links. Well, the math went awry and the bike is 4
inches lower. We were shooting for 3 inches. Is this too much? Any
clearance issues at that or other lowered distances?
How much can I lower the front end for him if I slide the tubes up in
the triple trees?
Thanks.
I hope that doing without my KLR is short temporary thing.
David Fallon
441
-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 5:22 pm
lowering links, 4 inches?
David
I am sure that your friend will have problems with wheel/tyre clearance with
a 4" lowering. Others may chime in shortly but I'm pretty sure the tyre will
hit the underside of the rear guard and also the pegs will scrape very early
in any leaning.
Cheers
Griffo
-----Original Message-----
From: DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com [mailto:DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of davidfallon441
Sent: Friday, 14 December 2007 12:02
To: DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [DSN_KLR650] Lowering links, 4 inches?
Hi all;
I need a little advise. A fellow at work is interested in buying my
KLR, but he feels it is too tall. He being a machinist, we worked out
some new lowering links. Well, the math went awry and the bike is 4
inches lower. We were shooting for 3 inches. Is this too much? Any
clearance issues at that or other lowered distances?
How much can I lower the front end for him if I slide the tubes up in
the triple trees?
Thanks.
I hope that doing without my KLR is short temporary thing.
David Fallon
441
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
-
- Posts: 1251
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2004 2:52 pm
lowering links, 4 inches?
--- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, "davidfallon441" wrote:
The longer links increase the leverage of the swingarm on the spring, effectively softening the rear springing. If not corrected for by increased preload or a stiffer spring, this will exacerbate the risk of bottoming the tire on the fender. Four inches is almost unheard of. Most people lower the bike an inch. many eventually return it to stock height after gaining some riding experience. Guys have been known to ride the bike around with the forks in the shipping position, slid up 3" in the clamps, either by mistake or by design. I wouldn't be surprised if the front tire then hits the fender, too. I read somewhere recently that each .31" in added length on the links gives an inch of lowering.> > Hi all; > > I need a little advise. A fellow at work is interested in buying my > KLR, but he feels it is too tall. He being a machinist, we worked out > some new lowering links. Well, the math went awry and the bike is 4 > inches lower. We were shooting for 3 inches. Is this too much? Any > clearance issues at that or other lowered distances? > > How much can I lower the front end for him if I slide the tubes up in > the triple trees? > > Thanks. > > I hope that doing without my KLR is short temporary thing. >
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 8:01 pm
lowering links, 4 inches?
Thanks for the note about the changing leverage softening the spring.
My friend is going to come sit on it today. I wouldn't be surprised
if he sees it is way lower than he anticipated.
I calculated the rate as lengthening the links .354" to get an inch of
lowering, so I got that a little high. He wanted 3 inches so we
multiplied that by 3 and then he fudged in a little too. We'll no
doubt get to make a new set.
I'm not surprised to hear that people go back to the original links
eventually.
David Fallon
441
--- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, "Jud Jones" wrote: > > The longer links increase the leverage of the swingarm on the spring, effectively softening > the rear springing. If not corrected for by increased preload or a stiffer spring, this will > exacerbate the risk of bottoming the tire on the fender. > > Four inches is almost unheard of. Most people lower the bike an inch. many eventually > return it to stock height after gaining some riding experience. > > Guys have been known to ride the bike around with the forks in the shipping position, slid > up 3" in the clamps, either by mistake or by design. I wouldn't be surprised if the front > tire then hits the fender, too. > > I read somewhere recently that each .31" in added length on the links gives an inch of > lowering. >
-
- Posts: 125
- Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2007 12:13 pm
lowering links, 4 inches?
Unless your friend weighs 50 pounds its going to bottom out
prematurely. I lowered mine either 1 1/2 or 2 inches and can't ride
two -up on the road without dialing up full shock spring. I don't even
want to think about off-road riding. I agree that 4 inches is just too
much. At some point you just have to say the KLR isn't appropriate.
There are some pretty short folks out there riding KLR's and loving it.
-
- Posts: 813
- Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 2:05 pm
lowering links, 4 inches?
PROBLEM: with roughly 9" of suspension travel, but ONLY 5" of ground clearance (stock 9"
minus 4" lower), SOMETHING'S gonna happen when he hits a BIG bump...!
Ed
-
- Posts: 165
- Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 8:45 am
nklr: a posting question
Off list of course
Sorry Fred
--- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, "Fred Hink" wrote: > > NOT ON THIS LIST YOU WON'T. > > Fred > List Admin. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Kerry Stottlemyer > To: DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Friday, December 14, 2007 2:04 PM > Subject: [DSN_KLR650] Re: NKLR: A posting question > > > Umm nothing snide about it Just the way i feel about things. > Now if you want me to be snide I can acomidations you. > Lighten up will ya. > Oh and you may have replyed directly to me instead of the board. > > --- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, "Joel" wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > Just wondering why. . . > > > > I posted a comment, which did not appear in my daily digest, yet I > > received--in my private e-mail--a snide anti-religious reply from a > Mr. > > Stottlemyer. > > > > Can anyone enlighten me? Thanks, and Merry Christmas to everyone! > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests