> Hi All > > I need to get a pair of motorcycle boots soon. I wear > a size 14 shoe. It looks like AlpineStar Tech 4's will > work, but I have the option to get either motocross > sole or an all terrain enduro sole. Which is the best > for general dualsport riding on the back roads of > Baja, Death Valley, etc. > > Is there another boot I should be looking at? > > TIA > > Randy from Burbank
gold country dual sport ride
- 
				The Mule
 - Posts: 581
 - Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2001 8:42 pm
 
boots
I went with Hi-Points.........because I'm a retro fashion whore I 
 s'pose. They're made by Alpinestars, and I just love how the metal platage 
 matches the Icon Titanium plated Timax gloves. ROCK-ON!!!
 
      Anywho.......there are two philosophies I've heard about riding soles. 
 One says flatter soles are safer, as it slides over terrain if you stick 
 your foot out and is less likely to catch on a root, rock, half-buried 
 skull, whatever.... and snap yer foot-ankle-leg (pick yer choice). The other 
 sez ya need traction to push outta trouble and stomp around in the woods, 
 etc. Guess it depends on how much dirt/mud walking/dragging you expect to 
 do. My Hi-Points have a relatively flat sole and I have no complaints. 
 They're greasy over the rough stuff when I stick my stumps out, and I just 
 dig my heels in if I need leverage yanking the bike out of quicksand or 
 ambulating up 'n down God's steep unpaved creation.
 
 So are you a flat-soler, waffle-stomper or a flip-flopper?
 Come Nov. 4th, which Bone do you wanna pick? The Skull & Bones candidate or 
 the Skull & Bones candidate?
 (rhetorical query.....no need to reply!)
 
 
 Steve
 The Mule
 A17
 
 
 
			
			
									
									
						- 
				Randall Marbach
 - Posts: 404
 - Joined: Sat Oct 18, 2003 6:57 pm
 
boots
Hi Mule
 
 This flat sole sliding versus digging in issue is one
 of my key concerns about which sole to choose. I have
 no dirt experience to speak of and at age 53. I am not
 sure that I want to be able to hot shoe it around a
 motocross track. However, I am taking my first dirt
 bike riding lessons this weekend and I am planning to
 rent all the gear from the school, so this should give
 me an oppurtunity to get some first hand experience
 with a set of off road motorcycle boots.
 
 But from what I have seen from all the great posts so
 far, it looks like the choice will be between the
 Alpinestar Tech 4s (not sure which sole yet) and the
 Aerostitch Combat Touring boots. Can anybody tell me
 what the pros and cons of these two pair of boots are
 with regard to the relative safety in the dirt.
 Assuming they are comparable, I am leaning towards the
 Aerostitch boots.
 
 
 TIA
 
 Randy
 --- The Mule  wrote:
 
 
			
			
									
									
						_______________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today! http://vote.yahoo.com> I went with Hi-Points.........because I'm a > retro fashion whore I > s'pose. They're made by Alpinestars, and I just love > how the metal platage > matches the Icon Titanium plated Timax gloves. > ROCK-ON!!! > > Anywho.......there are two philosophies I've > heard about riding soles. > One says flatter soles are safer, as it slides over > terrain if you stick > your foot out and is less likely to catch on a root, > rock, half-buried > skull, whatever.... and snap yer foot-ankle-leg > (pick yer choice). The other > sez ya need traction to push outta trouble and stomp > around in the woods, > etc. Guess it depends on how much dirt/mud > walking/dragging you expect to > do. My Hi-Points have a relatively flat sole and I > have no complaints. > They're greasy over the rough stuff when I stick my > stumps out, and I just > dig my heels in if I need leverage yanking the bike > out of quicksand or > ambulating up 'n down God's steep unpaved creation. > > So are you a flat-soler, waffle-stomper or a > flip-flopper? > Come Nov. 4th, which Bone do you wanna pick? The > Skull & Bones candidate or > the Skull & Bones candidate? > (rhetorical query.....no need to reply!) > > > Steve > The Mule > A17 > > > > Hi All > > > > I need to get a pair of motorcycle boots soon. I > wear > > a size 14 shoe. It looks like AlpineStar Tech 4's > will > > work, but I have the option to get either > motocross > > sole or an all terrain enduro sole. Which is the > best > > for general dualsport riding on the back roads of > > Baja, Death Valley, etc. > > > > Is there another boot I should be looking at? > > > > TIA > > > > Randy from Burbank > >
- 
				Randall Marbach
 - Posts: 404
 - Joined: Sat Oct 18, 2003 6:57 pm
 
boots
Hi BFGB..
 
 
 What brand of armored dualsport boots to you
 have/recommend.  I expect that I will be spending most
 of my time in dual sport mode and I haven't been able
 to identify a boot that would be good in this role.
 
 
 TIA
 
 Randy from Burbank
 
 
 
 --- bigfatgreenbike 
 wrote:
 
 
 ---------------------------------
     
 
 remarbach@... wrote:
   
 Hi MuleThis flat sole sliding versus digging in issue
 is oneof my key concerns about which sole to choose. I
 haveno dirt experience to speak of and at age 53. I am
 notsure that I want to be able to hot shoe it around
 amotocross track. However, I am taking my first
 dirtbike riding lessons this weekend and I am planning
 torent all the gear from the school, so this should
 giveme an oppurtunity to get some first hand
 experiencewith a set of off road motorcycle boots.But
 from what I have seen from all the great posts sofar,
 it looks like the choice will be between theAlpinestar
 Tech 4s (not sure which sole yet) and theAerostitch
 Combat Touring boots. Can anybody tell mewhat the pros
 and cons of these two pair of boots arewith regard to
 the relative safety in the dirt.Assuming they are
 comparable, I am leaning towards theAerostitch boots.
 It depends on what kind of riding you are buying for.
 The aerostich"combat touring boots" are touring boots-
 riding a bike around onroads, paved and unpaved, and
 some walking. They are not offroad ridingboots, as my
 buddy who broke his ankle wearing them can attest to.
 Aserious MX boot may have prevented his injury. 
 
 A serious MX boot is somewhat easier to walk around in
 than ski boots.Somewhere in the middle are armored,
 waterproof-liner, breatheabledualsport boots. The
 alpinestars might be better as the combat touringboots
 have no integral armour. 
 
 My dualsport and MX boots have an almost flat sole.
 Works great. I havea pair of chippewa laceup boots
 with a thick heel, they also workgreat. 
 
 Devon
 
 
 
 
 
 		
 _______________________________
 Do you Yahoo!?
 Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
 http://vote.yahoo.com
			
			
									
									
						- 
				Randall Marbach
 - Posts: 404
 - Joined: Sat Oct 18, 2003 6:57 pm
 
boots
I believe that Sidi is the company that makes the
 Aerostitch Combat Touring Boots. I wonder how they
 compare to your BMW boots?
 
 
 
 
 --- bigfatgreenbike 
 wrote:
 
 
 ---------------------------------
     
 
 remarbach@... wrote:
   
 Hi BFGB..What brand of armored dualsport boots to
 youhave/recommend.  I expect that I will be spending
 mostof my time in dual sport mode and I haven't been
 ableto identify a boot that would be good in this
 role.  
 
 I have a set of these BMW brand calf-high boots, with
 some simple hardplates sewn inside the leather to
 prevent breaking the little bone thatsticks out of
 your ankle, and also to protect the shins.
 They'regore-tex lined and have so far been
 unbelievably waterproof. The onlyreason I got the BMW
 boots, was the shop owner said he'd give me arefund if
 they leaked. They're actually made by some Italian
 company(probably Sidi?) and then they sew on a little
 tiny BMW emblem whichadds $100 to the price.  These
 are the lightest boots I'd consider,they have a velcro
 flap and two buckles for a closure.  I think
 they'recalled the "Kalihari" boots. When the time
 comes to replace them I planto save myself $100 by
 finding similar boots from whoever makes themfor BMW
 in the first place. 
 
 Basically imagine dropping a motorcycle on your ankle.
 One layer ofleather won't really help. Sidi makes
 waterproof-lined MX boots, whichwould be the best
 protection but not fun to walk in.  I would
 suggestgoing to a shop that stocks a bunch of
 different boots, and see whichones have a waterproof
 liner and armour. The BMW boots are now 3 yearsand
 35,000m old. No complaints besides the initial
 gouging. 
 
 Devon
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 		
 _______________________________
 Do you Yahoo!?
 Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
 http://vote.yahoo.com
			
			
									
									
						- 
				Judson D. Jones
 - Posts: 1037
 - Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2002 11:52 am
 
boots
--- In DSN_klr650@yahoogroups.com, Randall Marbach  
 wrote:
 
 
			
			
									
									
						I have had the Combat Touring boots for about 11 years, and bought a pair of Tech 6s this year. (Tech 4s would have been fine, but I got a super deal on "last year's" Tech 6s. So I'm out of style. Laugh all you want.) The Aerostich boots have worked fine, and I still wear them for many conditions. But I have decided that I want more armor for riding in rocks. The Aerostich are more comfortable for everyday riding, but the Alpine Stars aren't bad, and I haven't got them fully broken in. Because I have worn my Aerostich boots primarily off-road, They haven't needed soles yet, but lots of guys have replaced the mx soles with Vibram lugs.> > But from what I have seen from all the great posts so > far, it looks like the choice will be between the > Alpinestar Tech 4s (not sure which sole yet) and the > Aerostitch Combat Touring boots. Can anybody tell me > what the pros and cons of these two pair of boots are > with regard to the relative safety in the dirt. > Assuming they are comparable, I am leaning towards the > Aerostitch boots. >
- 
				Devon
 - Posts: 933
 - Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2001 7:13 pm
 
boots
AFAIK the combat touring boots have no armor in them and do not have a 
 waterproof liner. The BMW boots have some very basic armor, and are 
 waterproof. Worksmanship seems top-shelf on both.
 
 Devon
 
 remarbach@... wrote:
 
 
			
			
									
									
						>I believe that Sidi is the company that makes the >Aerostitch Combat Touring Boots. I wonder how they >compare to your BMW boots? > >
- 
				Arden Kysely
 - Posts: 1578
 - Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2001 8:18 am
 
boots
I just got the Sidi Discovery model and like them a lot. They have 
 more armor than the Combat Touring boots, a reasonable sole for 
 walking, and are supposed to be waterproof. I'll let you know more 
 about the latter if it ever rains again in SoCal.
 
 __Arden
 
 -- In DSN_klr650@yahoogroups.com, "Judson D. Jones"  
 wrote:
 
			
			
									
									
						a pair> > --- In DSN_klr650@yahoogroups.com, Randall Marbach > wrote: > > > > > But from what I have seen from all the great posts so > > far, it looks like the choice will be between the > > Alpinestar Tech 4s (not sure which sole yet) and the > > Aerostitch Combat Touring boots. Can anybody tell me > > what the pros and cons of these two pair of boots are > > with regard to the relative safety in the dirt. > > Assuming they are comparable, I am leaning towards the > > Aerostitch boots. > > > > > I have had the Combat Touring boots for about 11 years, and bought
super deal on> of Tech 6s this year. (Tech 4s would have been fine, but I got a
many> "last year's" Tech 6s. So I'm out of style. Laugh all you want.) > > The Aerostich boots have worked fine, and I still wear them for
rocks. The> conditions. But I have decided that I want more armor for riding in
Stars> Aerostich are more comfortable for everyday riding, but the Alpine
haven't> aren't bad, and I haven't got them fully broken in. > > Because I have worn my Aerostich boots primarily off-road, They
Vibram> needed soles yet, but lots of guys have replaced the mx soles with
> lugs.
- 
				Lecours, Jean-Francois
 - Posts: 12
 - Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2004 2:44 pm
 
boots
Hi all
 
 I do not post a lot but I read a lot...
 
 I want to buy some boots but just can't decide... So to give me some ideas:
 
 What do you wear? Pros/cons, everything I need to know, go ahead.
 
 Thanks
 
 JFLecours
 Ottawa, Canada
- 
				Darren Clark
 - Posts: 265
 - Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:10 pm
 
boots
I've been using Alpine Stars Tech4's and I'm happy with them. The only 
 thing is they're not water proof, if you ride in heavy rain your feet 
 will be soaked. Oh I have the size 14's, I'm not sure if the height is 
 different for different sizes, while standing up and riding the top of 
 my boot hooked on to the fuel valve and broke it off.
 
 Darren Clark
 
 2004 KLR650 A18
 
 Lecours, Jean-Francois wrote:
 
 
			
			
									
									
						>Hi all > >I do not post a lot but I read a lot... > >I want to buy some boots but just can't decide... So to give me some ideas: > >What do you wear? Pros/cons, everything I need to know, go ahead. > >Thanks > >JFLecours >Ottawa, Canada > > > >Archive Quicksearch at: http://www.angelfire.com/ut/moab/klr650_data_search.html >List sponsored by Dual Sport News at: www.dualsportnews.com >List FAQ courtesy of Chris Krok at: www.bigcee.com/klr650faq.html > > >Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > >
- 
				klr250not
 - Posts: 127
 - Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 6:31 pm
 
boots
Alpinestars stunt shoes--not really "boots" but lightweight shoes 
 you can run in if need be.  Black and red too and stylish--not like 
 the rubber galoshes with metal buckles the sportbike crowd suspects 
 us of wearing.
 
 ------------------------------------
 
 
 --- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, "Lecours, Jean-Francois" 
  wrote:
 
			
			
									
									
						some ideas:> Hi all > > I do not post a lot but I read a lot... > > I want to buy some boots but just can't decide... So to give me
> > What do you wear? Pros/cons, everything I need to know, go ahead. > > Thanks > > JFLecours > Ottawa, Canada
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 57 guests