insurance (again)

DSN_KLR650
Ramey
Posts: 205
Joined: Thu Apr 25, 2002 6:49 pm

sub frame upgrade

Post by Ramey » Fri Mar 17, 2006 8:38 pm

FWIW---I've done 3 upgrades. Freehand drilled all. Used 3/8 bolt on two, with Snap-on 1/4 stuff for tightening. No problems, it is a close fit and getting very far off could be a prob, though not the end of the world. On the last one, I used a 5/16, much more latitude. The 5/16, full shank, no threads, is thicker then stock. One of the bikes was close to failure-subframe was cutting the bolt from vibs. Could still have a trip failure, but replacing a through bolt is much easier. Used the existing holes for line up and started. Keep'er straight and Bob's your uncle. Cost maybe $1 1/2 per bike. Zac -----Original Message----- From: DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com [mailto:DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of pzzldpnthr Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 11:43 AM To: DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com Subject: [DSN_KLR650] Re: Sub Frame Upgrade I was curious how long it took to complete the drill through method and what the actual procedures were? Was it difficult? Any special tools required? I know dual star supplies the drill guide and bits. --- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, "Stuart Mumford" wrote:
> > I've done both, and the drill-through method gives me more peace
of mind.
> I've seen > the upper bolts break while out riding, and it always happens at
the worst
> time. > > Mark me as voting for the drill through method too. > > More work, more mooney, more peace of mind. > > Thanks > CA Stu > > > > Even in the comfort of your garage, extracting or > > grinding out that broken off hardened bolt will be a > > memorably unpleasant experience. I'm a cheapskate and > > I vote strongly for drilling through. > > > > -Luke > > > > --- oc4art wrote: > > > > > I have been strugglign to understand this upgrade > > > and am so confused > > > > > > I have done nothing. > > > > > > There are two sub frame upgrade kits being sold by > > > most of the > > > vendors > > > > > > 1- $5, this includes 4 hardened bolts to replace the > > > ones that are > > > there now > > > 2- $40 - this is the drill through version that > > > replaces the two > > > upper bolts with one long bolts. > > > > > > $35 is allot of difference, what are your thoughts > > > and what upgrade > > > would you recommend. I got some advice from Andy, > > > but I am still > > > unsure and don't want to cut corners on something > > > that could be very > > > harmful. > > > > > > I ride 80% dirt > > > > > > Thanks everyone in advance >
Archive Quicksearch at: http://www.angelfire.com/ut/moab/klr650_data_search.html List sponsored by Dual Sport News at: www.dualsportnews.com List FAQ courtesy of Chris Krok at: www.bigcee.com/klr650faq.html Member Map at: http://www.frappr.com/dsnklr650 Yahoo! Groups Links

Tony JONES
Posts: 184
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2016 12:58 am

sub frame upgrade

Post by Tony JONES » Sat Mar 18, 2006 12:12 am

1) Does anyone have pictures of the procedure? Seems like a good addition for the MarkNet site. If not, I'll try and do it and submit some. 2) Is there a list of the necessary hardware (size and fastener strength)? I have a large number of cobalt and regular drill bits in various lengths so I don't feel the need to go the route of the DualStar kit. Also have a great hardware store locally which has an extensive metric bolt selection. Tony
> Full decent instructions are still posted courtesy > Chris, who used to sell the upgrade but I believe no > longer does. > > http://www.bigcee.com/instructions/ultb.pdf

dooden
Posts: 3355
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2001 3:37 pm

sub frame upgrade

Post by dooden » Sat Mar 18, 2006 7:13 am

OR you could ensure that your fasteners are tight and not really worry about it. I happen to have installed bolts that Jake had offered and loc-tighted them in with the Red stuff. I offroad and ride kinda hard, but worry about keeping the rubber side at least pointed towards the ground way more than them bolts. Perhaps if you load your bike like a pack mule and go doing James Stewart style jumps the through bolts are a good idea. Do what you feel you need to your ride, afterall its... ummm "yours" Dooden A15 Green Ape --- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, "Mike Peplinski" wrote:
> > Not to be confused little grasshopper. The 4 bolt change is great
for street
> riders. The stock bolts are unpredictable, the 5 buck replacements
have a
> mettalurgical pedigree and are much stronger. The steel is actually
tougher.
> The problem is that the bolts loosen, bend and shear, leving you
with a
> locktite'd stud in the frame and maybe a damaged gas tank and wireing > harness. The 40 buck deal replaces a questionable design, the top
bolts,
> with a much more stout through bolt. The mere increase in diameter
of the
> bolt makes this system stronger. For 80% off road I"d go the through
bolt
> route. For street riding you can check your bolts every couple of
thousand
> miles or for 5 bucks, change them out and forget about it. > > > >From: "oc4art" > >To: DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com > >Subject: [DSN_KLR650] Sub Frame Upgrade > >Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 07:03:03 -0000 > > > >I have been strugglign to understand this upgrade and am so confused > > > >I have done nothing. > > > >There are two sub frame upgrade kits being sold by most of the > >vendors > > > >1- $5, this includes 4 hardened bolts to replace the ones that are > >there now > >2- $40 - this is the drill through version that replaces the two > >upper bolts with one long bolts. > > > >$35 is allot of difference, what are your thoughts and what upgrade > >would you recommend. I got some advice from Andy, but I am still > >unsure and don't want to cut corners on something that could be very > >harmful. > > > >I ride 80% dirt > > > >Thanks everyone in advance > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Archive Quicksearch at: > >http://www.angelfire.com/ut/moab/klr650_data_search.html > >List sponsored by Dual Sport News at: www.dualsportnews.com > >List FAQ courtesy of Chris Krok at: www.bigcee.com/klr650faq.html > >Member Map at: http://www.frappr.com/dsnklr650 > >Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > >

Jeff Saline
Posts: 2246
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2003 6:02 pm

insurance (again)

Post by Jeff Saline » Sat Mar 18, 2006 1:21 pm

On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 16:11:08 -0000 "Ken" writes:
> Hi, > > I was just reading through all the messages about insurance, but I'm > still > confused (my normal state). > > My agent says that I need medical to cover my passenger even though > I have > my own health insurance. She says I need uninsured motorist in case > my > passenger has damages after an accident with an uninsured motorist. > > > Does this sound right?? > > Ken > 05 KLR650 > 88 GL1500
??????????????????//////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\////////////////////////////// Ken, I used to not carry medical as I didn't carry passengers. When I decided I'd sometimes carry a passenger I got the medical for I think $10,000. That might cover costs as I try my best not to ride like an idiot, in traffic when it can be avoided and I and any passenger always wear protective gear. In my vehicles everyone wears a seat belt or they can get out and walk. My toys, my rules. : ) My home owner's and vehicle insurance got bumped up a significant amount just to make sure I have coverage if something happens. I have numerous folks over to work on bikes. I'm pretty strict with safety in my shop and tend to supervise all operations. If someone doesn't like that they can do the work elsewhere. I've never had someone leave. So far I've been accident free but I sleep well knowing I have coverage that will probably allow me to keep my house if something bad happens. If you don't think your agent is giving you correct information it might be time for a new agent. My thoughts on this are why would you pay someone if you aren't gonna trust the information they supply? When I go to the doctor I ask questions but they tell me what's going on. Same as I'm sometimes insulted when folks ask me for mechanical information and then tell me I'm wrong. Heck, if they knew the answer why'd they ask the question? : ) Best, Jeff Saline ABC # 4412 South Dakota Airmarshal Airheads Beemer Club www.airheads.org The Beautiful Black Hills of South Dakota 75 R90/6, 03 KLR650, 79 R100RT

pzzldpnthr
Posts: 42
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 4:43 pm

sub frame upgrade

Post by pzzldpnthr » Sat Mar 18, 2006 1:49 pm

Thanks for the link. I looked at the directions, and on a side note they indicate that you may be able to drill one side of the upper bolts while the other side is still bolted. But its says that they haven't tried it. It is supposed to keep everything lined up. Has anybody tried this method? if you--- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, Analog Aardvark wrote:
> > > Full decent instructions are still posted courtesy > Chris, who used to sell the upgrade but I believe no > longer does. > > http://www.bigcee.com/instructions/ultb.pdf > > -Luke > a17 > > > > --- pzzldpnthr wrote: > > > I was curious how long it took to complete the drill > > through method > > and what the actual procedures were? Was it > > difficult? Any special > > tools required? I know dual star supplies the drill > > guide and bits. > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com >

Mike Peplinski
Posts: 782
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2004 8:55 pm

sub frame upgrade

Post by Mike Peplinski » Sat Mar 18, 2006 2:50 pm

Hey guys, just so you understand, harder, higher "grade" bolts are not necessarily better. My limitted metallurgical knowledge tells me that the standare bolt, a grade 2 (I think) is plenty hard. Just get hit in the head by one. It has a certain amount of carbon in it. This bolt is fine for many applications where a low cost, positive attachment is required. It is pretty vibration and fatigue resistant as well. Understand that carbon is what gives steel its "hardness". Lets leave it at that without going too deeply into it. The grade 5 bolt is heat treated to give it additional hardness on the surface. The bolt is "harder" and has a somewhat higher tensile (stretch) and yield (bending) strength. If the application calls for a harder surface, more resistant to scuffing or nicking, grade 5 may be OK. The grade 8 is actually called an alloy, higher in carbon and is definitely harder, on a Brinell or Rockwell scale (higher tension and yield strengths) but the brittleness is also higher so if the application calls for some bending, because some attachments are meant to give a little, the grade 8 bolt will fail sooner than a 2. Grade 8 bolts are also typically not used in a high vibration application because they stress crack. Obviously the frame attachment is not meant to flex. The higher tensile strength of a grade 8, or its metric equivelant, 12.5, can be tightened more and is less likely to stretch and come loose.
>From: "Robert Melvin" >To: DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com >Subject: Re: [DSN_KLR650] Sub Frame Upgrade >Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 10:31:22 -0800 > >Hi, > >(sorry for the confusion with my emails - Gmail has some features that >have caused me some difficulty / confusion - I think I have it taken >care of now. This is what I meant to send.) > >Yes, $35 is a lot of difference - but not if you have to drill a >hardened bolt out - especially if you are not doing so at a time / >place of your choosing with all the correct tools and the ability / >time to go back to the store for more bits, etc... Such an experience >will easily cost $35 even without taking into account time, missed >plans, and aggravation. > >I used to have a '72 Volvo with a modified Delco alternator and it >would break grade 8 bolts - I finally found a Caterpillar track bolt >that was supposed to be something like a grade 11 equivalent - it >never broke. > >However, what I would do though is put a nut on the bolt, slot the >thread end of the bolt with a hacksaw or grinder, unscrew the nut >(repairs threads a bit) and then use the bolt. On the Volvo, I had >access to the slotted end of the bolt after it had broken and I would >unscrew it with a straight bladed screwdriver (easy), replace the bolt >with the next victim, and drive home with headlights. > > >Archive Quicksearch at: >http://www.angelfire.com/ut/moab/klr650_data_search.html >List sponsored by Dual Sport News at: www.dualsportnews.com >List FAQ courtesy of Chris Krok at: www.bigcee.com/klr650faq.html >Member Map at: http://www.frappr.com/dsnklr650 >Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > >

revmaaatin
Posts: 1727
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2003 3:07 pm

sub frame upgrade

Post by revmaaatin » Sat Mar 18, 2006 3:35 pm

--- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, "Mike Peplinski" wrote:
> > Hey guys, just so you understand, harder, higher "grade" bolts are
not
> necessarily better. My limitted metallurgical knowledge tells me
that the
> standare bolt, a grade 2 (I think) is plenty hard. Just get hit in
the head
> by one. It has a certain amount of carbon in it. This bolt is fine
for many
> applications where a low cost, positive attachment is required. It
is pretty
> vibration and fatigue resistant as well. Understand that carbon is
what
> gives steel its "hardness". Lets leave it at that without going too
deeply
> into it. The grade 5 bolt is heat treated to give it additional
hardness on
> the surface. The bolt is "harder" and has a somewhat higher tensile > (stretch) and yield (bending) strength. If the application calls
for a
> harder surface, more resistant to scuffing or nicking, grade 5 may
be OK.
> The grade 8 is actually called an alloy, higher in carbon and is
definitely
> harder, on a Brinell or Rockwell scale (higher tension and yield
strengths)
> but the brittleness is also higher so if the application calls for
some
> bending, because some attachments are meant to give a little, the
grade 8
> bolt will fail sooner than a 2. Grade 8 bolts are also typically
not used
> in a high vibration application because they stress crack.
Obviously the
> frame attachment is not meant to flex. The higher tensile strength
of a
> grade 8, or its metric equivelant, 12.5, can be tightened more and
is less
> likely to stretch and come loose. > > > >From: "Robert Melvin" > >To: DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com > >Subject: Re: [DSN_KLR650] Sub Frame Upgrade > >Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 10:31:22 -0800 > > > >Hi, > > > >(sorry for the confusion with my emails - Gmail has some features
that
> >have caused me some difficulty / confusion - I think I have it
taken
> >care of now. This is what I meant to send.) > > > >Yes, $35 is a lot of difference - but not if you have to drill a > >hardened bolt out - especially if you are not doing so at a time / > >place of your choosing with all the correct tools and the ability / > >time to go back to the store for more bits, etc... Such an
experience
> >will easily cost $35 even without taking into account time, missed > >plans, and aggravation. > > > >I used to have a '72 Volvo with a modified Delco alternator and it > >would break grade 8 bolts - I finally found a Caterpillar track
bolt
> >that was supposed to be something like a grade 11 equivalent - it > >never broke. > > > >However, what I would do though is put a nut on the bolt, slot the > >thread end of the bolt with a hacksaw or grinder, unscrew the nut > >(repairs threads a bit) and then use the bolt. On the Volvo, I had > >access to the slotted end of the bolt after it had broken and I
would
> >unscrew it with a straight bladed screwdriver (easy), replace the
bolt
> >with the next victim, and drive home with headlights. > > > > > >Archive Quicksearch at: > >http://www.angelfire.com/ut/moab/klr650_data_search.html > >List sponsored by Dual Sport News at: www.dualsportnews.com > >List FAQ courtesy of Chris Krok at: www.bigcee.com/klr650faq.html > >Member Map at: http://www.frappr.com/dsnklr650 > >Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests