digest number 6218

DSN_KLR650
Post Reply
spacer.conrad@lycos.com
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 6:05 pm

digest number 6218

Post by spacer.conrad@lycos.com » Fri Apr 08, 2005 7:22 pm

Armchair Socialists, probably in possession of a really cool motorcycle and most likely some sort of automobile, probably living it up in one of the richest countries in the world, crying alligator tears for the poor saps in third world countries while they sip chai in their coffee house of choice, The Motorcycle Diaries comfortably nestled in amongst the other DVDs. Never a thought that perhaps a few cents or a couple of dollars an hour in one of these undeveloped nations (I wonder who forgot to develop them... more likely some Tyrant who convinced the people they should live for Society...) probably holds a lot more value than the same amount here in the States. This is not a zero sum game, and capitalism isn't to blame any more than the auto in a crash. Seems the worst we get from "Capitalism" has a whole lot of government embedded, like a cancer. Get real, if you think this lifestyle is the world's problem. Show some cajones and give it up... for the good of Society. (Hitler almost succeeded... you guys are on his track, you should know.) Sorry about the grammar, and the off-topicness, but I had to get two cents in.
----- Original Message ----- From: DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com To: DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com Subject: [DSN_KLR650] Digest Number 6218 Date: 8 Apr 2005 21:35:24 -0000 > > > There are 25 messages in this issue. > > Topics in this digest: > > 1. RE: Re: Wildlife nklr > From: "Ramey" > 2. RE: Re: Wildlife nklr > From: "Russell Scott" > 3. Re: Re: dDSN...KLR.... WHAT BIKE DO I HAVE > From: Doug Herr > 4. Re: Re: Wildlife nklr > From: rm@... > 5. Re: Re: Wildlife nklr > From: Ron Criswell > 6. Re: dDSN...KLR.... WHAT BIKE DO I HAVE > From: "Kentucky Jim" > 7. RE: was, Wildlife nklr now NEW KLR > From: js > 8. NKLR Re: Wildlife nklr > From: "klr250not" > 9. RE: RE: Wildlife NKLR / Book recommendation > From: "Stuart Mumford" > 10. Re: NKLR Re: Wildlife nklr > From: John Kokola > 11. NY Dohicky/Tech Session > From: "southampton12000" > 12. Re: NKLR Re: Wildlife nklr > From: Ron Criswell > 13. NKLR Re: Wildlife nklr > From: "klr250not" > 14. NKLR Re: Wildlife nklr > From: "CA Stu" > 15. Re: Re: Wildlife nklr > From: "Harry Seifert" > 16. Re: NKLR Re: Wildlife nklr > From: Ron Criswell > 17. Re: Wildlife nklr Iggy and Lou > From: Alan L Henderson > 18. Re: First Tank Slapper Today > From: "Mike Peplinski" > 19. Re: First Tank Slapper Today > From: "Mike Peplinski" > 20. Re: Helmet Help > From: "Mike Peplinski" > 21. NKLR - Overpopulation (was wildlife & other nonsense) > From: Bill Emmack > 22. NKLR Re: Wildlife nklr > From: "klr250not" > 23. Re: NKLR Re: Wildlife nklr > From: Bogdan Swider > 24. Re: Re: Wildlife nklr > From: Bogdan Swider > 25. klr streaming video > From: Charles Earl > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > ________________________________________________________________________ > > Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 11:05:07 -0700 > From: "Ramey" > Subject: RE: Re: Wildlife nklr > > Ahhh.....the pyramid scheme, the most efficient distribution of wealth and > goods the world has ever seen. Exactly why communism failed. The western > world has found the solution already to the population problem-not fewer > children,but ramped up purchases-thereby negating the need for a larger > population. This is why a Big Mac is more costly in the western world as > opposed to the undeveloped world. Will the "world" suffer? Of course, always > has always will. Remember- abortion, suicide and euthanasia help. HTH. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bogdan Swider [mailto:bSwider@...] > Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 10:43 AM > To: rm@...; don cain > Cc: klr250not; DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com > Subject: Re: [DSN_KLR650] Re: Wildlife nklr > > > > > > > > > >> I did........ Just out of curiosity - does having the sucsess of our > >> economy based on an ever growing purchasing population seem like a > >> huge pyrimid scheme to anyone else? > > > > I agree with this psot. > > > > RM > > What's your alternative ? > > Bogdan > > > > Archive Quicksearch at: > http://www.angelfire.com/ut/moab/klr650_data_search.html > List sponsored by Dual Sport News at: www.dualsportnews.com > List FAQ courtesy of Chris Krok at: www.bigcee.com/klr650faq.html > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > ________________________________________________________________________ > > Message: 2 > Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 11:04:00 -0700 > From: "Russell Scott" > Subject: RE: Re: Wildlife nklr > > The answer to all of man's problems has already been devised by a mind that > has had eternity to craft the solution. We just need the vacuum of > ignorance to reach maximum abhorrence. > > R > > -----Original Message----- > From: rm@... [mailto:rm@...] > Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 10:48 AM > To: Bogdan Swider; don cain > Cc: klr250not; DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com > Subject: Re: [DSN_KLR650] Re: Wildlife nklr > > > > >>> I did........ Just out of curiosity - does having the sucsess of our > >>> economy based on an ever growing purchasing population seem like a > >>> huge pyrimid scheme to anyone else? > > >> I agree with this psot. > > > What's your alternative ? > > To disagree with his psot. It's a binary paradigm. > > RM > > > Archive Quicksearch at: > http://www.angelfire.com/ut/moab/klr650_data_search.html > List sponsored by Dual Sport News at: www.dualsportnews.com > List FAQ courtesy of Chris Krok at: www.bigcee.com/klr650faq.html > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > ________________________________________________________________________ > > Message: 3 > Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 11:08:21 -0700 (PDT) > From: Doug Herr > Subject: Re: Re: dDSN...KLR.... WHAT BIKE DO I HAVE > > On Fri, 8 Apr 2005, Bill Watson wrote: > > >> From: "Randall R. Davis" > >> Subject: RE: Re: dDSN...KLR.... WHAT BIKE DO I HAVE > >> > >> This is interesting. My KLR is a 2005 as indicated by the title, the > >> 10/04 > >> date stamp, and the color (dark red and black) but not the VIN? > >> > >> JKAKLEA145DA16283 > >> Made in "Thailand" > >> > >> Interesting > > > Randy, your bike is a 2005, even by the VIN. The last 5 digits > > of our VINS is the consecutive unit number (CUN). Yours is > > 16283, and that's clearly an '05. I don't have the numbers > > with me (I'm at work so I'm working off memory) but the last > > '04's CUN was somewhere around 12000-13000. Your bike would be > > referred to as an "A19" as it's the 19th model year of > > production. > > And the FAQ does state that the 10th digit in the VIN indicates > the year. Your 10th digit is "5", indicating 2005. > > The FAQ states: > > What year is my KLR? > > The frame sticker shows the date of manufacture. The model year > for all cars and bikes sold in the US is indicated by the tenth > digit of the VIN (this is an ISO standard, and is becoming more > widely used). > M=1991; N=1992; P=1993; R=1994; S=1995; T=1996; V=1997; W=1998; > X=1999; Y=2000; 1=2001; 2=2002...A=2010... > > > -- > Doug Herr > doug@... > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > ________________________________________________________________________ > > Message: 4 > Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 11:14:05 -0700 > From: rm@... > Subject: Re: Re: Wildlife nklr > > > I'll confess you went over my head especially as I read psot as post. > > OK I know what a binary paradigm is but I don't get psot. Please > > explain for us cabbage heads. > > It's an intentional typo of "post". For no good reason. > > Is your head spinning yet? > > RM > > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > ________________________________________________________________________ > > Message: 5 > Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 13:28:01 -0700 > From: Ron Criswell > Subject: Re: Re: Wildlife nklr > > Ya'll come on down. You will have to eat Tex Mex food though. And move > out west where all the space is. Miles and miles of nothing (but cows > and deer). Second thought move to Dallas and I'll go out west. > > Criswell > On Friday, April 8, 2005, at 10:23 AM, Tengai Mark Van Horn wrote: > > > > > At 7:54 AM -0700 4/8/05, rm@... wrote: > >> Nobody wants to be the first to step up and say "Six billion > >> people is enough -- > > > > If you do the math, that 6 billion will fit an area the size of > > Texas' land area with 38 people per acre, and it would be about as > > dense as Rio de Janeiro or as third as dense as Cairo. > > China only ranks 77th in pop density and they have 1/4 of the word's > > population. A lot of places that vacationers define as paradise are > > more dense (Virgin Islands, St Lucia, Jamaica, Aruba, Seychelles, > > Mauritius, Dutch Antilles, Switzerland, Cayman Is.) > > The world's a tad bigger than the doomsdayists will have you believe. > > > > Mark > > > > > > Archive Quicksearch at: > > http://www.angelfire.com/ut/moab/klr650_data_search.html > > List sponsored by Dual Sport News at: www.dualsportnews.com > > List FAQ courtesy of Chris Krok at: www.bigcee.com/klr650faq.html > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > ________________________________________________________________________ > > Message: 6 > Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 18:43:55 -0000 > From: "Kentucky Jim" > Subject: Re: dDSN...KLR.... WHAT BIKE DO I HAVE > > > --- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, "klr250not" > wrote: > > > > --- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, "John" wrote: > > > > Guys... how do you know what to look for in the model ye > have...ie > > to > tell what year or what actual model you own...????? Thanks.John > > > > > > > > ----------------------------------- > > > > Its stamped on the frame as part of the serial number: about the > 8th > > or 9th digit from the left youll find an "A". The two digits > after > > the A signify the year, with A19 being 2005, A18--2004, on down to > A1-- > > > This is not correct. > You can't tell the year of a KLR650 by looking for A1-A19 in the VIN. > The A1-A19 is NOT in the VIN except by chance. > > > Jimbo > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > ________________________________________________________________________ > > Message: 7 > Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 11:52:06 -0700 > From: js > Subject: RE: was, Wildlife nklr now NEW KLR > > rm@... wrote: > > >> I'll confess you went over my head especially as I read psot as post. > >> OK I know what a binary paradigm is but I don't get psot. Please > >> explain for us cabbage heads. > >> > >> > > > > It's an intentional typo of "post". For no good reason. > > > > Is your head spinning yet? > > > > RM > > > > > > > an here I wuz thinking he wuz tawkin about pots... > > anyways da answer is easy, of course - Vegas Bay-bee! > > anyways, went to my fav palm reader the other nite - Madam Zalinskya - I > call her Lupe. > An she has confirmed that Kawi is DEFINITELY coming out with any update > on the DS thingamajig. > she even gave me the URL... > shez amazin! > > http://www.strangevehicles.com/content/item/13724.html > > can't wait for the tahr thread... > > js > > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > ________________________________________________________________________ > > Message: 8 > Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 18:57:01 -0000 > From: "klr250not" > Subject: NKLR Re: Wildlife nklr > > > Yeah, enough is enough and 6 billion sounds like enough to me. Its > not like all those millions in Calcutta and Bombay are just having a > fine time jammed together on the sidewalks (call it home) trying to > avoid starvation, heat stroke and cobras. > > Anyway, by my math you'd need 600,000 square miles to pack in 6 > billion people at 10,000 per square mile (denser than Washington > D.C.). Thats Texas, New Mexico, Arizona and California at least. > And 6 billion is probably old news by now, call it 7. > > ----------------------------------------- > > --- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, "Arden Kysely" > wrote: > > > > Sure, pack 'em in! But don't forget that they need food and homes > and > > produce waste. There may be resources for 6 billion on the planet, > but > > what about 12, or 24, or 48? Where does it stop? Where do the > > resources come from? Can you call it living if you bump into > someone > > or step in their waste every time you turn around? We go to > > places like Death Valley just because they are empty and we enjoy > > the > feeling > > of space. If every landmass was chock-full of humans we wouldn't > have > > much place to ride, or otherwise recreate. Why not hold the > population > > steady and keep the Earth a decent place to live? On the other > hand, > > putting them all in Texas sounds pretty good, too. 8~) > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > ________________________________________________________________________ > > Message: 9 > Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 12:00:21 -0700 > From: "Stuart Mumford" > Subject: RE: RE: Wildlife NKLR / Book recommendation > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > CA Stu > space, not a lot > > > of people. > > > > Hey, Stu.....When we met in Moab I remember you telling that you purposely > > polluted the planet by having several children ( brats ). I think you said > > you also had a wife. After reading today's posts I'm thinking > > that I assumed > > things that perhaps I should not have. Especially, since I know > > that you're > > one guy that deeply cares about our planet and worries about its finite > > resources. Just to clear things up. Are your children - how can I ask > > diplomatically - ah human ? They don't have four legs and fur do they ? > > Is your wife...ah...a female human ? I know you go up to Canada > > sometime... > > > > Bogdan > > > > Hi Bogdan, as always, you present several interesting questions. I shall > attempt to answer them all. > > Yes, I have 3 children. > Yes, I have a wife. > I do deeply care about our planet and its finite resource. > My children, I'm proud to say, are all fine examples of humans. > I do have a cat that is older than my oldest child, he has four legs and > fur, and is definitely part of the family, so I guess one of my dependants > (not technically a "child", but a far better mouser than all my children > combined) does have four legs and fur. > My wife is a hot Southern California blond yoga teaching female human. > Haven't been to canada for a long time. 26 years. > > I'm not as eloquent as some people, Bogdan. I are lacking in higher > education. > > Plus, I posted that first one before my second cup of coffee (and daily > bowel movement/ life changing event) so it may not be my finest work ever. > > To try and rephrase my original post to reflect my intentions; > I don't buy into the fearmongering regarding overpopulation, global warming, > and various other manufactured crises designed to keep lawyers busy and the > general population living in fear and confusion. > Localized overpopulation is indeed a reality, I concede that. However, the > original post was worded in a fashion that I found asinine and misinformed. > > As far as finite resources, I rode a bicycle to work one day last week, my > KLR a couple of times in the last two weeks. Both of these vehicles use far > less fuel and parking space than a car, emit less pollution, and leave a lot > less wear and tear on the roads. > Hell, I even scheduled my work 4 days a week, thereby reducing the amount of > pollutants our workforce's commuting is responsible for by 20%. > > So yes, I believe in conservation of natural resources, and no, I'm not > concerned what "environmentalist" lawyers want me to be scared of. > > Thanks > CA Stu, whose sperm count is only matched by his incredible handsomeness. > And modesty. > > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > ________________________________________________________________________ > > Message: 10 > Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 15:04:33 -0400 (GMT-04:00) > From: John Kokola > Subject: Re: NKLR Re: Wildlife nklr > > Alright, how about some consideration to what the 'experts' say ... > > "U.N. estimates for 2050 are down from 9.4 billion to 8.9 billion. > The population is expected to stabilize at 9 billion by 2300. The > long-range report marks the first time the U.N. has issued > projections for years as distant as 2300, 150 years further out > than earlier estimates." > > http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2003-12-09-worldpop-usat_x.htm > > --John Kokola > not that USAToday is my idea of hard news, but there you go > > -----Original Message----- > From: klr250not > > Yeah, enough is enough and 6 billion sounds like enough to me. > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > ________________________________________________________________________ > > Message: 11 > Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 19:07:46 -0000 > From: "southampton12000" > Subject: NY Dohicky/Tech Session > > > Well folks, it's the time of year to see if there is any interest in > the famous NY doohicky seesion which never seems to evolve. > I'm willing to travel almost anywhere in the greater NY area but I > have available a 3bdrm apt. that is not being used until May 15th that > is available for those who want to spend Fri or Sat Night. There is a > large parking lot available for work Sat. after 1pm and all day > Sunday. The location is Southampton NY out by the woods and beaches > of eastern long island. What say yee? > brian barrett > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > ________________________________________________________________________ > > Message: 12 > Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:12:21 -0700 > From: Ron Criswell > Subject: Re: NKLR Re: Wildlife nklr > > I trust U.N. figures less than our intelligence network. And that is > saying something. > > Criswell > On Friday, April 8, 2005, at 12:04 PM, John Kokola wrote: > > > > > Alright, how about some consideration to what the 'experts' say ... > > > > "U.N. estimates for 2050 are down from 9.4 billion to 8.9 > > billion. The population is expected to stabilize at 9 billion by > > 2300. The long-range report marks the first time the U.N. has > > issued projections for years as distant as 2300, 150 years > > further out than earlier estimates." > > > > http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2003-12-09-worldpop-usat_x.htm > > > > --John Kokola > > not that USAToday is my idea of hard news, but there you go > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: klr250not > > > > Yeah, enough is enough and 6 billion sounds like enough to me. > > > > > > Archive Quicksearch at: > > http://www.angelfire.com/ut/moab/klr650_data_search.html > > List sponsored by Dual Sport News at: www.dualsportnews.com > > List FAQ courtesy of Chris Krok at: www.bigcee.com/klr650faq.html > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > ________________________________________________________________________ > > Message: 13 > Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 19:25:45 -0000 > From: "klr250not" > Subject: NKLR Re: Wildlife nklr > > > 6 B is way too many in my book; 2-3 B would be far more comfortable, > especially for cougars and many other species more deserving of their > habitat than humanity is. Legislating a death penalty for those who > kill protected species, or even shoot game out of season, might help > chip away at the total. > > ------------------------------------------------- > > --- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, John Kokola wrote: > > Alright, how about some consideration to what the 'experts' say ... > > > > "U.N. estimates for 2050 are down from 9.4 billion to 8.9 billion. > The population is expected to stabilize at 9 billion by 2300. The long- > range report marks the first time the U.N. has issued projections for > years as distant as 2300, 150 years further out than earlier > estimates." > > > > http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2003-12-09-worldpop-usat_x.htm > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > ________________________________________________________________________ > > Message: 14 > Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 19:38:00 -0000 > From: "CA Stu" > Subject: NKLR Re: Wildlife nklr > > > Let's all pull numbers out of the air and make wild predictions, > shall we? > > This post reeks of the "I've got mine, everyone else can go screw" > mentality. > > If you have the courage of your convictions, you should eat a bullet. > > Thanks > CA Stu > > PS last post on this subject from me. > > --- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, "klr250not" > wrote: > > > > 6 B is way too many in my book; 2-3 B would be far more > comfortable, > > especially for cougars and many other species more deserving of > their > > habitat than humanity is. Legislating a death penalty for those > who > > kill protected species, or even shoot game out of season, might > help > > chip away at the total. > > > > ------------------------------------------------- > > > > --- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, John Kokola > wrote: > > > Alright, how about some consideration to what the 'experts' > say ... > > > > "U.N. estimates for 2050 are down from 9.4 billion to 8.9 > billion. > > The population is expected to stabilize at 9 billion by 2300. The > long- > > range report marks the first time the U.N. has issued projections > for > > years as distant as 2300, 150 years further out than earlier estimates." > > > > http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2003-12-09-worldpop-usat_x.htm > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > ________________________________________________________________________ > > Message: 15 > Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 12:38:26 -0700 > From: "Harry Seifert" > Subject: Re: Re: Wildlife nklr > > I believe this is called capitalism. or I see it as cancer....ever > growing, overconsuming and eventually, death to the host. > > Buddy > bseifert71@... > > > > [Original Message] > > From: > > To: don cain > > Cc: klr250not ; DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com> > > Date: 4/8/2005 10:35:05 AM > > Subject: Re: [DSN_KLR650] Re: Wildlife nklr > > > > > > On Fri, 8 Apr 2005 08:09:01 -0700, "don cain" said: > > > > > I did........ Just out of curiosity - does having the sucsess of our > > > economy based on an ever growing purchasing population seem like a > > > huge pyrimid scheme to anyone else? > > > > I agree with this psot. > > > > RM > > > > > > Archive Quicksearch at: > http://www.angelfire.com/ut/moab/klr650_data_search.html > > List sponsored by Dual Sport News at: www.dualsportnews.com List > > FAQ courtesy of Chris Krok at: www.bigcee.com/klr650faq.html > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > ________________________________________________________________________ > > Message: 16 > Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:38:41 -0700 > From: Ron Criswell > Subject: Re: NKLR Re: Wildlife nklr > > Emm I don't know where you live but there is a s______ load of open > space all over the world (except for India maybe). Get in an airplane > and fly over it, or a car / bike and drive for a while. Seems there is > a lot of space for critters. I have seen quite a bit of it. Sometimes I > have seen so much it has almost put me to sleep. > > Criswell > On Friday, April 8, 2005, at 12:25 PM, klr250not wrote: > > > > > > > 6 B is way too many in my book; 2-3 B would be far more comfortable, > > especially for cougars and many other species more deserving of their > > habitat than humanity is. Legislating a death penalty for those who > > kill protected species, or even shoot game out of season, might help > > chip away at the total. > > > > ------------------------------------------------- > > > > --- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, John Kokola wrote: > >> Alright, how about some consideration to what the 'experts' say ... > >> > >> "U.N. estimates for 2050 are down from 9.4 billion to 8.9 billion. > > The population is expected to stabilize at 9 billion by 2300. The long- > > range report marks the first time the U.N. has issued projections for > > years as distant as 2300, 150 years further out than earlier > > estimates." > >> > >> http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2003-12-09-worldpop-usat_x.htm > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Archive Quicksearch at: > > http://www.angelfire.com/ut/moab/klr650_data_search.html > > List sponsored by Dual Sport News at: www.dualsportnews.com > > List FAQ courtesy of Chris Krok at: www.bigcee.com/klr650faq.html > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > ________________________________________________________________________ > > Message: 17 > Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 15:07:45 -0500 > From: Alan L Henderson > Subject: Re: Wildlife nklr Iggy and Lou > > Bogdan Swider wrote: > > Below is what they send you if you work in a school in Colorado. > > > > Bogdan > > > If you observe the mountain lion contact Security immediately so in turn > > we can contact the Department of Wildlife. Whatever you do, please do not > > approach the lion. > > > > Ron Smith > > Chief of Security > > > I don't know how the hell we've gotten from Bogdan's initial post to > what it has morphed into now, but this constant talk of "Wildlife" makes > me want to listen to Iggy Pop, or the Velvet Underground. > > Alan Henderson A13 Iowa "Lust for Life" makes good add music? > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > ________________________________________________________________________ > > Message: 18 > Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 15:13:26 -0500 > From: "Mike Peplinski" > Subject: Re: First Tank Slapper Today > > I had a nasty wobble at 65 on my BMW airhead. Just short of a tankslapper > but definitely a "undies stainer". Turned out that tire pressure took care > of it. > > > From: rm@... > > To: "John" , DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com > > Subject: Re: [DSN_KLR650] First Tank Slapper Today > > Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 21:03:08 -0700 > > > > > > On Fri, 08 Apr 2005 01:46:13 -0000, "John" said: > > > > > What actually causes this? Is there any preventative things I can do > > > to the bike to keep it from happening? What about riding technique? My > > > goal was to get out from a tight squeeze and slowing seemed the only > > > way to go. But maybe not. > > > > * Forks fully entended (and not in the lowered shipping position)? > > * Too much rear preload? > > * Worn front wheel bearings? > > * Underinflated front tire? > > * Kenda 270 front tire? > > * Worn fork bushings (sliders)? > > * Loose headset bearings? > > > > I'd start with front tire pressure. If you're under 32psi, try 32. > > > > Does the front-end ever wobble under normal riding conditions? > > > > RM > > > > > > Archive Quicksearch at: > > http://www.angelfire.com/ut/moab/klr650_data_search.html > > List sponsored by Dual Sport News at: www.dualsportnews.com > > List FAQ courtesy of Chris Krok at: www.bigcee.com/klr650faq.html > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > ________________________________________________________________________ > > Message: 19 > Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 15:25:55 -0500 > From: "Mike Peplinski" > Subject: Re: First Tank Slapper Today > > Give this site a look-see > www.joe250.com/motorcycles/ride/tankslapper.htm > > > From: rm@... > > To: "John" , DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com > > Subject: Re: [DSN_KLR650] First Tank Slapper Today > > Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 21:03:08 -0700 > > > > > > On Fri, 08 Apr 2005 01:46:13 -0000, "John" said: > > > > > What actually causes this? Is there any preventative things I can do > > > to the bike to keep it from happening? What about riding technique? My > > > goal was to get out from a tight squeeze and slowing seemed the only > > > way to go. But maybe not. > > > > * Forks fully entended (and not in the lowered shipping position)? > > * Too much rear preload? > > * Worn front wheel bearings? > > * Underinflated front tire? > > * Kenda 270 front tire? > > * Worn fork bushings (sliders)? > > * Loose headset bearings? > > > > I'd start with front tire pressure. If you're under 32psi, try 32. > > > > Does the front-end ever wobble under normal riding conditions? > > > > RM > > > > > > Archive Quicksearch at: > > http://www.angelfire.com/ut/moab/klr650_data_search.html > > List sponsored by Dual Sport News at: www.dualsportnews.com > > List FAQ courtesy of Chris Krok at: www.bigcee.com/klr650faq.html > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > ________________________________________________________________________ > > Message: 20 > Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 15:29:29 -0500 > From: "Mike Peplinski" > Subject: Re: Helmet Help > > The April 05 issue of Rider Magazine has a good article. I"ve got an HJC. > I"ve got a few problems' 1/ very noisy, 2/ pretty hot, 3/ interior is > wearing poorly. On the plus side, it was pretty cheap and I don't mind > tossing it when it gets too shabby. > > > From: Ron Criswell > > To: "cclitle" > > CC: DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com > > Subject: Re: [DSN_KLR650] Helmet Help > > Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 21:14:36 -0700 > > > > > > HJC seems to be good bang for the buck. > > > > Criswell > > On Thursday, April 7, 2005, at 04:49 PM, cclitle wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I need to breakdown and buy a good helmet, but I don't want to to > > > spend a fortune. I live in Montana so it should be warm but be able > > > to vent for hot days. I would like a full face but I wear glasses so > > > it needs to open. Any recommendations on brands and makes. Also any > > > good source on the web to buy a helmet. > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > Helmetless in Montana > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Archive Quicksearch at: > > > http://www.angelfire.com/ut/moab/klr650_data_search.html > > > List sponsored by Dual Sport News at: www.dualsportnews.com > > > List FAQ courtesy of Chris Krok at: www.bigcee.com/klr650faq.html > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Archive Quicksearch at: > > http://www.angelfire.com/ut/moab/klr650_data_search.html > > List sponsored by Dual Sport News at: www.dualsportnews.com > > List FAQ courtesy of Chris Krok at: www.bigcee.com/klr650faq.html > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > ________________________________________________________________________ > > Message: 21 > Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 13:48:32 -0700 (PDT) > From: Bill Emmack > Subject: NKLR - Overpopulation (was wildlife & other nonsense) > > Might I suggest a solution to overpopulation that was modestly proposed > almost 300 years ago: > > http://www.english.upenn.edu/~jlynch/Courses/95c/Texts/modest.html > > BE > SF, A9 > > > > __________________________________ > Yahoo! Messenger > Show us what our next emoticon should look like. Join the fun. > http://www.advision.webevents.yahoo.com/emoticontest > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > ________________________________________________________________________ > > Message: 22 > Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 21:21:42 -0000 > From: "klr250not" > Subject: NKLR Re: Wildlife nklr > > > Well that sounds like a wild ass threat to me. I'm going to suggest > that you be thrown off this board. "Eat a bullet"--Ive got > something for you to eat if you care to look me up. We're in the > same state as I recall. > > > > --- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, "CA Stu" wrote: > > > > Let's all pull numbers out of the air and make wild predictions, shall we? > > > > This post reeks of the "I've got mine, everyone else can go screw" mentality. > > > > If you have the courage of your convictions, you should eat a > bullet. > > > > Thanks > > CA Stu > > > > PS last post on this subject from me. > > > > --- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, "klr250not" wrote: > > > > 6 B is way too many in my book; 2-3 B would be far more > > comfortable, > especially for cougars and many other species more > > deserving of their > habitat than humanity is. Legislating a > > death penalty for those who > kill protected species, or even > > shoot game out of season, might help > chip away at the total. > > > > ------------------------------------------------- > > > > --- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, John Kokola wrote: > > > > Alright, how about some consideration to what the 'experts' say ... > > > > > > "U.N. estimates for 2050 are down from 9.4 billion to 8.9 > > billion. > The population is expected to stabilize at 9 billion > > by 2300. > The > > long- > > > range report marks the first time the U.N. has issued > projections > > for > years as distant as 2300, 150 years further out than > > earlier > estimates." > > > > > > http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2003-12-09-worldpop- > usat_x.htm > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > ________________________________________________________________________ > > Message: 23 > Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 15:22:24 -0600 > From: Bogdan Swider > Subject: Re: NKLR Re: Wildlife nklr > > > > > > If you have the courage of your convictions, you should eat a bullet. > > Only if you do it in the woods so you would feed the fauna. Better than a > bullet would be to position your body in such a way as to initiate a > mountain lion attack. We don't want these cuddly creatures loosing their > hunting skills. > > Bogdan > > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > ________________________________________________________________________ > > Message: 24 > Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 15:32:58 -0600 > From: Bogdan Swider > Subject: Re: Re: Wildlife nklr > > > > > I believe this is called capitalism. or I see it as cancer....ever > > growing, overconsuming and eventually, death to the host. > > Yeah, as to growing and overconsuming I agree...don't know about the death > to host part. But again, Buddy, what alternative do you propose ? I guess > the Chinese under Mao didn't consume much; now their lousy capitalist > economy is helping raise our price of gas. Medieval peasants probably didn't > consume as much as we do either. > > Bogdan > > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > ________________________________________________________________________ > > Message: 25 > Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:35:21 -0700 (PDT) > From: Charles Earl > Subject: klr streaming video > > Thanks! I got the shots from a co-worker. We do work > for Verticare Showcopters, a stunt copter team. My > friend jumped on board from Watsonville to SF and > back. He was practicing using the nose mounted > gyrocam. I'm going to learn to use this soon. You > basically sit in the back of the vehicle and operate a > control board while viewing through a hooded monitor. > The vehicle is equiped with the hi-res nose gyrocam, > front and rear facing lipstick cams in the cockpit and > a lipstick cam on the tailrotor boom. You can switch > between the cameras at will. If you like helicopters, > we made a piece for these guys, you can view it at: > > http://www.travelswithromney.com/ > > Charles-->>once thought his klr could fly, then I woke > up! > > Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 22:48:47 -0700 > From: "Russell Scott" > Streaming video with no hiccups nice! Where did you > get those aerial > shots? > Don't tell me your KLR flies. That would be > trisportmotorcycling.com. > > R > -----Original Message----- > From: Charles Earl [mailto:cdearl1@...] > Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 9:09 PM > To: DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [DSN_KLR650] klr streaming video > > > > I took a short ride up the coast several weekends ago. > I thought I'd throw some of the shots together and > make a short streaming video. Please bear with my > site, it's under construction. > > http://www.dualsportmotorcycling.com/ > > Charles Earl > Santa Cruz, CA > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > ________________________________________________________________________ > > > Archive Quicksearch at: > http://www.angelfire.com/ut/moab/klr650_data_search.html > List sponsored by Dual Sport News at: www.dualsportnews.com > List FAQ courtesy of Chris Krok at: www.bigcee.com/klr650faq.html > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ "I drank WHAT???" -- Socrates -- _______________________________________________ NEW! Lycos Dating Search. The only place to search multiple dating sites at once. http://datingsearch.lycos.com

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests