In a message dated 2/24/2005 9:20:27 AM Pacific Standard Time,  
 asbestosworkers@... writes:
 
 After  all that you have went through with your seat it should 
 massage your  rearend while riding, causing you to not want to get off 
 the bike.
 If I  was going to spend that much money on one I would send it to 
 Russel's and  have one made. The one that looks like the old harley 
 bicycle  seat.
 
 
 
 Seats are one of those things were every one will have a valid  difference of 
 opinion on what works. The stock seat sucks, but a big part of  that is it is 
 a dirt bike seat designed so you can easily move around, but that  makes it 
 to narrow to comfortably support your checks. 
  
 Being an old dirt biker, when I don't have the narrow stock seat it  hampers 
 my style. I've got a flat Corbin and love it for my long road trips, but  
 otherwise the stock seat is on the bike because it works better for me off road.  
 I'm looking forward to the chance to sit on Moose's bike to see what it feels  
 like. If its good I might have my seat done, without the extra width and 
 height. 
  
 Pat
 G'ville, NV
 
 
 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
shorter links for raising rear ride height.
- 
				Keith Saltzer
 - Posts: 1071
 - Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2003 10:03 pm
 
shorter links for raising rear ride height.
Yea, that's right.  I'm talking about raising the back end up some 
 more on the already tall KLR.  Really light riders probably don't 
 need them, shorter riders don't want them, but my now 200 pound frame 
 is still compressing the back end down both farther than I like, and 
 farther than the correct sag setting numbers will allow.
 
 Before I go on telling you about how these worked, and what I 
 experianced on MY bike, with MY settings, and MY aftermarket 
 suspension parts, let me point out the fact that others results can 
 and/or will vary greatly.  I've been talking  about suspension 
 setups, numbers, rates, theory's, ideas, and the like to people 
 online, on the phone, and in person for many combined hours over the 
 last few weeks.  There is just WAAAAAYYYYYYY to many factors involved 
 here to think that you can just do this or that, and get the exact 
 same result.  Some things are for sure, like putting shorter links on 
 your bike WILL result in the back end being raised, but how much will 
 vary, and the ride quality will vary as well.  Here's what these 
 links did for my bike and riding style.  Note that I rebuilt my shock 
 1 1/2 years ago with a new seal-head, fresh 15 wt fluid, and a 175 
 psi nitro charge.  The front end has many hours of work too.
 
 Enter some new heavy duty aluminum links from Eagle Mike.  I got a 
 set of these ultra cool black anodized links from Mike to try out on 
 my KLR last week.  They are a bit lighter than the stock links, and 6 
 mm shorter.  They are suppose to raise the back end about 3/4 inch.
 
 I took all sorts of sag and stiction measurements with the stock 
 links to later measure again and compare notes, then I pulled the 
 swingarm completely apart to clean up the bearings, relube everything 
 (it's been 2 years) and put on these shorter links.  I left all the 
 shock settings alone (rebound 3 preload 5) and just put it all back 
 together so that the only thing changed would be the links.  I like 
 testing things out this way to try and eliminate all other 
 influencing factors.
 
 When I dropped the bike down off the jack, the bike settled to the 
 floor with a really aggressive GSXR looking angle to it.  I said to 
 myself, "Houston, we definately have lift up".  I barely noticed the 
 back end sink down at all.  I later measured that it only dropped 
 9mm.  I then threw a leg over it and settled into the front part of 
 the seat and felt that my feet were off the ground more, but not 
 enough to concern me.  I got off the bike and put it on it's side 
 stand.  I looked it over for a while and noticed that while it was 
 leaning over more due to the extra rear height, it didn't seem that 
 bad at all, but I did think that I might have to watch how I park it 
 on the side stand more carefully.  I also noticed that my super 
 simple way of checking for chain slack was changed a bit.  Now for 
 the test ride.
 
 I went for my first test ride on the "Sunday morning ride" with the 
 usual local suspects.  It was raining this day so only 2 other guys 
 showed up, but during the 120 mile ride I did manage to get a good 
 half hour run through one set of twisties while 2 of us battled it 
 out.  While riding throughout the day, at both slow and fast paces, I 
 noticed a MUCH improved steering rate.  If you like to turn as fast 
 as possible, this is very cool.  Not only that, but after reading and 
 learning some things this week, then trying out my new setup, I 
 learned that my stock setup had a decent amount of understeer going 
 on while exiting turns hard on the gas.  I now noticed that when I 
 pointed the bike while leaned over and hit the gas hard, it went 
 where I wanted it to go with less effort, and more accuracy.  I also 
 felt the back end "working" much quicker.  It felt like my shock 
 spring was stronger because the shorter links are a shorter leverage 
 point.  But it just "feels" this way.  Measurments showed that I was 
 still in the middle of the shock travel.  After I was out for a 
 while, it suddenly dawned on me that I was not having to pay 
 attention to where I parked the bike any more than before due to the 
 extra lean while on the side stand.  For as high as the back end was 
 raised, I thought that this was going to be a concern, but it 
 wasn't.  The one negative that I felt while riding was a very twitchy 
 back end on slippery spots.  Not wet roads, but the very slick type 
 surfaces like tar snakes and white painted lines and arrows.  I 
 realize that most bikes will slide on these areas quite a bit, but 
 again, I'm comparing my bike against my bike with different links.  I 
 didn't have this problem before.  After coming home and learning some 
 more, I realized that what I was experiencing made sense.  In the 
 suspension world, when your talking about springs and preload, you 
 don't want a spring to have more than 25mm of preload when it is 
 installed.  You also want all of your settings to be dialed in with 
 as little preload as possible.  Here I was riding around with the 
 stock spring (which comes with 35-36mm of preload, with the preload 
 on 1) and then I had the preload cranked all the way up to 5!
 
 Two days later I took another test ride only this time I put the 
 preload on 1.  Big difference to say the least.  I like it a lot, but 
 I still have more work to do to perfect all my numbers.  It was 
 interesting to notice that with these links, and my preload cranked 
 all the way down to just 1, my back end was still up higher than with 
 the stock links, and the rear suspension still felt like it was 
 reacting to bumps quicker.  I then later cranked up the preload to 2, 
 and liked it the best.  I thought that it felt like that was THE 
 setting for me at this stage of the game, and I later confirmed that 
 by cranking up the preload to 3 before heading home.  The very stiff 
 rear end feel started to again show up, and the attitude of the bike 
 started leaning forward again.
 
 All in all I'm very happy with the results.  Instead of riding around 
 with the preload cranked all the way up to 5, while still having a 
 very slow acting rear suspension, and the back of the bike sitting 
 way to low for me, AND having the back end squat even more with my 
 touring/camping load on the bike, I can now ride around with the 
 preload on 2 (or 3 with a load) and I get the added benefits of the 
 raised up back end.  All this from just 6mm shorter links, taking all 
 of 5 minutes to put on.  Pretty cool.
 
 MrMoose
 A8 (Barbie and Ken special)
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 52 guests