loud pipe save what again ?

DSN_KLR650
Post Reply
aches@deltech.net
Posts: 200
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2000 9:47 am

gps vs speedo

Post by aches@deltech.net » Tue May 02, 2000 2:12 am

I've also found the GPS and the speedo to vary about 5% on both my KLR and my R11RA. Found the same on Police radar checks with my R11GSA I had which was in tune with the GPS there also. Even the last ticket I recieved was right on with the GPS seed reading on flat ground. Uphills and Downhills, the speed varies a bit. Andy Chesley Jennings, La.

Bob in Bama
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2001 8:28 pm

gps vs speedo

Post by Bob in Bama » Wed Apr 11, 2001 8:32 pm

I have a Garmin EMAP,very nice little GPS.I have noticed that with the emap mounted on my KLR at say 20-30 miles per hour there is little differnce in speedo read out.But at 80 Miles per on the speedo=73 miles per on the Emap.Major diff especially if u are crusing down the road and everybody is blowing by you and you look down at your speedo and you think you are running 65 Miles per.I will post a pic of the mount in the files section.I am loving this bike and thanks Fred for all the help witht he parts Bob in Bama

IronJungle@Hotmail.com
Posts: 389
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2001 8:04 pm

gps vs speedo

Post by IronJungle@Hotmail.com » Wed Apr 11, 2001 9:01 pm

The stock KLR speedo reads about 10% high at all speeds. Pat Austin TX
--- In DSN_klr650@y..., "Bob in Bama" wrote: > I have a Garmin EMAP,very nice little GPS.I have noticed that with > the emap mounted on my KLR at say 20-30 miles per hour there is > little differnce in speedo read out.But at 80 Miles per on the > speedo=73 miles per on the Emap.Major diff especially if u are > crusing down the road and everybody is blowing by you and you look > down at your speedo and you think you are running 65 Miles per.I will > post a pic of the mount in the files section.I am loving this bike > and thanks Fred for all the help witht he parts Bob in Bama

Guest

gps vs speedo

Post by Guest » Sun Apr 15, 2001 2:19 pm

Todd: I am using to sources to my "about 10% high" number. - GARMIN GPS on the bike - GearCalc software calculations (this assumes that the electronic tach is accurate) GearCalc and the GARMIN GPS match. Sorry about you ticket, Pat Austin, TX
>From: "zootpatutie" > > > The stock KLR speedo reads about 10% high at all speeds. > > > > Pat > > Austin TX > > >Not according to the cops. >Todd >A9
_________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

Andrus Chesley
Posts: 573
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2001 2:40 pm

gps vs speedo

Post by Andrus Chesley » Tue Apr 17, 2001 1:23 pm

Yes Bob. Thru the last 5 or so bikes I've run a GPS on the KLR is the worst one for being off on the speedo. Also, When you're going uphill or downhill the GPS will also be off. Andy Chesley Jennings, La. .But at 80 Miles per on the speedo=73 miles per on the Emap.Major diff

Andrus Chesley
Posts: 573
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2001 2:40 pm

gps vs speedo

Post by Andrus Chesley » Tue Apr 17, 2001 10:26 pm

Check it with a cop with radar and come back and talk some more. Andy Chesley Jennings, La.
----- Original Message ----- From: To: "Andrus Chesley" Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 4:00 PM Subject: Re: GPS vs Speedo > --- In DSN_klr650@y..., "Andrus Chesley" wrote: > Also, When you're going uphill or downhill the GPS > > will also be off. > > Andy, > > I didn't want to start a big GPS debate on the list, but the GPS is > very accurate up and down hills. > > Assuming a 6% grade (which is damn steep), the GPS would be off less > that 1/2 of 1 percent. > > For what it is worth... > > Pat >

Andrus Chesley
Posts: 573
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2001 2:40 pm

gps vs speedo

Post by Andrus Chesley » Wed Apr 18, 2001 8:07 am

Pat The standing behind my statements is checking gps speed vs speedo vs Arkansas state troopers radar readings. I was at a gas stop/resturant in the Ozarks and ended up in a discussion about gps's with the troopers there. And was telling them about a difference in straight flat roads vs uphill/downhill differences in the amount my speedo deferred from gps readings. One of the troopers couldn't see where it would make a difference. The other agreed with me on the theory that from above the distance I would travel would be seen as less. So we ended up on a long hill outside of town and they did readings of me going up hill and down hill ( which readings were the same) then found a flat strech and did the same thing at the same speed and rpms. This convinced myself and them that there is a difference. Though slight. Andy Chesley Jennings, La.
> Why do you say that it would not be accurate? There

Harvy
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon Aug 26, 2002 9:10 pm

loud pipe save what again ?

Post by Harvy » Thu Feb 20, 2003 2:35 pm

If you look up the definition of "Joe Sixpack" in the dictionary you will see my picture next to it, and I like a loud dirt bike. Joe Sixpack has spoken. Harv A14 ~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 00:07:42 -0000 From: "dooden " Subject: Loud Pipe Save what again ? http://www.motorcycledaily.com/26feb01noiselevel.html I like the part that they claim no performance gains that are worth mentioning. Vrooom Vrooom Dooden

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 59 guests