wiring problems

DSN_KLR650
jimsherlock
Posts: 139
Joined: Wed Jul 24, 2002 7:55 pm

nklr: suv guy?

Post by jimsherlock » Thu Aug 01, 2002 2:31 pm

Hey, what's with the shot at SUV's? I drive a Jeep Grand Cherokee and it goes off road as much or more than my KLR does. Matter of fact, I bought the Jeep because it was a Dual Sport vehicle. The medium sized to smaller SUV's are just four wheeled versions of our KLR's. Although my Jeep has tackled some terrain I would not even try on my KLR. The big and huge SUV's can be a different story. They are usually too large for trails. Yet, there are still places to use them. As far as a school bus. Well, if you consider taking one child to school and picking him up, I guess so. However, you must realize that 4WD Jeeps are awesome forces off road. I absolutely love mine. Jim Cedar Creek, Texas

RM
Posts: 1977
Joined: Tue May 09, 2000 7:20 pm

nklr: suv guy?

Post by RM » Thu Aug 01, 2002 2:38 pm

On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, jimsherlock wrote:
>Hey, what's with the shot at SUV's?
It's the stereotype. Picture: mom, rowdy kids, cell phone, obnoxious driving, never off-road....

judjonzz
Posts: 233
Joined: Sun Apr 21, 2002 11:33 am

nklr: suv guy?

Post by judjonzz » Thu Aug 01, 2002 4:05 pm

--- In DSN_klr650@y..., RM wrote:
> > On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, jimsherlock wrote: > > >Hey, what's with the shot at SUV's? > > It's the stereotype. Picture: mom, rowdy kids, cell phone,
obnoxious
> driving, never off-road....
And who was it who observed: :A stereotype doesn't arise in a vacuum." I call 'em SAV's: "Suburban Assault Vehicles." No legitimate place for them on our highways.

bmrbill
Posts: 141
Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2002 10:27 am

nklr: suv guy?

Post by bmrbill » Thu Aug 01, 2002 4:27 pm

--- In DSN_klr650@y..., "judjonzz" wrote:
> --- In DSN_klr650@y..., RM wrote: > > > > On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, jimsherlock wrote: > > > > >Hey, what's with the shot at SUV's? > > > > It's the stereotype. Picture: mom, rowdy kids, cell phone, > obnoxious > > driving, never off-road.... > > And who was it who observed: :A stereotype doesn't arise in a > vacuum." I call 'em SAV's: "Suburban Assault Vehicles." No > legitimate place for them on our highways.
Guess I need to quit my job or move or both. But then how would I justify a KLR or any other dual sport? As a play toy only? I can't afford that. I agree that stereotypes don't arise in a vacuum, but how many of us are stereotypical "bikers"? Bill A15-preferred commute vehicle 1994 Jeep GC (wouldn't make to work in the winter without it)

judjonzz
Posts: 233
Joined: Sun Apr 21, 2002 11:33 am

nklr: suv guy?

Post by judjonzz » Thu Aug 01, 2002 5:19 pm

--- In DSN_klr650@y..., "bmrbill" wrote:
> --- In DSN_klr650@y..., "judjonzz" wrote: > > --- In DSN_klr650@y..., RM wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, jimsherlock wrote: > > > > > > >Hey, what's with the shot at SUV's? > > > > > > It's the stereotype. Picture: mom, rowdy kids, cell phone, > > obnoxious > > > driving, never off-road.... > > > > And who was it who observed: :A stereotype doesn't arise in
a
> > vacuum." I call 'em SAV's: "Suburban Assault Vehicles." No > > legitimate place for them on our highways. > > Guess I need to quit my job or move or both. But then how
would I
> justify a KLR or any other dual sport? As a play toy only? I can't > afford that. I agree that stereotypes don't arise in a vacuum, but > how many of us are stereotypical "bikers"? > Bill > A15-preferred commute vehicle > 1994 Jeep GC (wouldn't make to work in the winter without it)
Let's refine the stereotype: "... 55 in the fast lane, until it snows, then crank it up to 75." Used to be, the first big snowfall put the Camaros and Trans-Ams off the road. Now the ditches are littered all winter with Cherokees, Excursions and Blazers, wheels up. I just put 140 lbs of sand in the trunk of the rat 320 and slither by, saving the 4x4 pickup for the big blizzards. Jud A12 (left all the boxers in the garage this year) '90 F150 (At least I can haul dirtbikes.)

bmrbill
Posts: 141
Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2002 10:27 am

nklr: suv guy?

Post by bmrbill » Thu Aug 01, 2002 5:30 pm

--- In DSN_klr650@y..., "judjonzz" wrote:
> --- In DSN_klr650@y..., "bmrbill" wrote: > > --- In DSN_klr650@y..., "judjonzz" wrote: > > > --- In DSN_klr650@y..., RM wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, jimsherlock wrote: > > > > > > > > >Hey, what's with the shot at SUV's? > > > > > > > > It's the stereotype. Picture: mom, rowdy kids, cell phone, > > > obnoxious > > > > driving, never off-road.... > > > > > > And who was it who observed: :A stereotype doesn't arise in > a > > > vacuum." I call 'em SAV's: "Suburban Assault Vehicles." No > > > legitimate place for them on our highways. > > > > Guess I need to quit my job or move or both. But then how > would I > > justify a KLR or any other dual sport? As a play toy only? I
can't
> > afford that. I agree that stereotypes don't arise in a vacuum,
but
> > how many of us are stereotypical "bikers"? > > Bill > > A15-preferred commute vehicle > > 1994 Jeep GC (wouldn't make to work in the winter without it) > > Let's refine the stereotype: "... 55 in the fast lane, until it
snows,
> then crank it up to 75." Used to be, the first big snowfall put
the
> Camaros and Trans-Ams off the road. Now the ditches are > littered all winter with Cherokees, Excursions and Blazers, > wheels up. I just put 140 lbs of sand in the trunk of the rat 320 > and slither by, saving the 4x4 pickup for the big blizzards. > > Jud > A12 (left all the boxers in the garage this year) > '90 F150 (At least I can haul dirtbikes.)
I like the tactic. Ignore the question and redefine the argument. Oh yeah, that's right. You said you were a lawyer. Talk about stereotypes...

judjonzz
Posts: 233
Joined: Sun Apr 21, 2002 11:33 am

nklr: suv guy?

Post by judjonzz » Thu Aug 01, 2002 6:29 pm

--- In DSN_klr650@y..., "bmrbill" wrote:
> --- In DSN_klr650@y..., "judjonzz" wrote: > > --- In DSN_klr650@y..., "bmrbill" wrote: > > > --- In DSN_klr650@y..., "judjonzz" wrote: > > > > --- In DSN_klr650@y..., RM wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, jimsherlock wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >Hey, what's with the shot at SUV's? > > > > > > > > > > It's the stereotype. Picture: mom, rowdy kids, cell
phone,
> > > > obnoxious > > > > > driving, never off-road.... > > > > > > > > And who was it who observed: :A stereotype doesn't arise
in
> > a > > > > vacuum." I call 'em SAV's: "Suburban Assault Vehicles."
No
> > > > legitimate place for them on our highways. > > > > > > Guess I need to quit my job or move or both. But then how > > would I > > > justify a KLR or any other dual sport? As a play toy only? I > can't > > > afford that. I agree that stereotypes don't arise in a vacuum, > but > > > how many of us are stereotypical "bikers"? > > > Bill > > > A15-preferred commute vehicle > > > 1994 Jeep GC (wouldn't make to work in the winter without
it)
> > > > Let's refine the stereotype: "... 55 in the fast lane, until it > snows, > > then crank it up to 75." Used to be, the first big snowfall put > the > > Camaros and Trans-Ams off the road. Now the ditches are > > littered all winter with Cherokees, Excursions and Blazers, > > wheels up. I just put 140 lbs of sand in the trunk of the rat
320
> > and slither by, saving the 4x4 pickup for the big blizzards. > > > > Jud > > A12 (left all the boxers in the garage this year) > > '90 F150 (At least I can haul dirtbikes.) > > I like the tactic. Ignore the question and redefine the argument. > Oh yeah, that's right. You said you were a lawyer. Talk about > stereotypes...
Ask a rhetorical question, get a rhetorical answer.

bmrbill
Posts: 141
Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2002 10:27 am

nklr: suv guy?

Post by bmrbill » Thu Aug 01, 2002 8:05 pm

> > I like the tactic. Ignore the question and redefine the
argument.
> > Oh yeah, that's right. You said you were a lawyer. Talk about > > stereotypes... > > Ask a rhetorical question, get a rhetorical answer.
Touche. In guess it just surprised me that a member of a highly stereotyped minority (biker or lawyer, take your pick) would make the blanket statement that SUVs (another stereotyped minority) have no "legitimate" place on the highways. I've heard the same statement regarding us two-wheelers. Keep the shiny side up, Jud. Bill

Zachariah Mully
Posts: 1897
Joined: Fri Apr 28, 2000 7:50 am

nklr: suv guy?

Post by Zachariah Mully » Fri Aug 02, 2002 7:33 am

On Thu, 2002-08-01 at 21:02, bmrbill wrote:
> Touche. In guess it just surprised me that a member of a highly > stereotyped minority (biker or lawyer, take your pick) would make the > blanket statement that SUVs (another stereotyped minority) have > no "legitimate" place on the highways. I've heard the same statement > regarding us two-wheelers. Keep the shiny side up, Jud. > Bill >
Personally, SUV's (I'm talking Exploreer/Expedition/Excursion size) should not be used for commuting from the burbs to the city core. And yes, stereotyping is, unfortunately, the only way to stay alive on the roads in and around DC. I see a white Honda with an Asian woman driving, I stay away! I see crapped out Toyota with stick on tinting and two black/asian guys with caesar's, I stay away... etc.etc.etc. This stereotypes keep me safe and alive. I am not prejuidiced against these people outside the car (shit, my girlfriend is blatent violator of no talking on the cell phone while driving... It's taken me three years to get her to start curbing that behavior), but once on the highways, if you're in *any* car, then you're my enemy, some cars I just avoid more. Z DC

Dave Morrow
Posts: 67
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2000 3:42 pm

nklr: suv guy?

Post by Dave Morrow » Fri Aug 02, 2002 7:55 am

> Let's refine the stereotype: "... 55 in the fast lane, until it snows, > then crank it up to 75." Used to be, the first big snowfall put the > Camaros and Trans-Ams off the road. Now the ditches are > littered all winter with Cherokees, Excursions and Blazers,
How small minded can you get. I've been sick of people branding motorcyclists as smelly outlaw bikers or reckless, obnoxious squids for as long as I can remember. Isn't labeling an entire class of vehicle owners because of the actions of a few exactly the thing we bitch about as motorcyclists? And don't give me any bullshit about "stereotypes don't arise in vacuum". That's not an argument. If you want to make a point use something resembling data. Of course there are lousy, incompetent drivers who own suv's. There are also smelly outlaws and reckless squids who own motorcycles. I own a Jeep and 3 bikes, I am niether an incompetent driver or a smelly outlaw. My Jeep has been winched out of mud up to the doorhandles, do you s'pose I should replace it with a Camry? As for your "no legitimate place on the highway" bullshit, lots more voting people think that about motorcycles than suv's. Let's not validate that attitude for them. It's astonishing to me to see someone in the motorcycle community thinking this way. -- Dave Morrow IS Manager R.E.Warner & Associates Westlake, Ohio 440-835-9400

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests