boulder_adv_rider/traderpro2003 should get lost for a while nklr

[Ed Dobson]

The post I was referring to: A real forum or just simple, narrow-minded fools? NKLR Message #187757 of 187829, Mon Oct 20, 2008 3:10 pm You people whining off-topic are unbelievable. Did you take the time to read the membership rules? NKLR discussions are acceptable. If you don't like a topic designated 'NKLR', DON'T READ IT. Move on. Are you some of you so intolerant that you can't hold an intelligent discussion or debate outside your beloved KLR? Are you really this shallow? If so, unsubscribe and go do something else. Go find some other group that will coddle you in your KLR microcosm little bubble. It really is pathetic. The complainers want more KLR content yet when they hit the keyboard themselves, nothing comes out. To these individuals, feel free to lead discussions or post something of value. If you prefer silence, go lock yourself in a closet. But don't come tell this forum what they're going to or should discuss. WE ALWAYS get to the most important KLR issues especially outside the (political) rutting season as Fred just noted. If you can't deal with that then punch out; personally, these people possessing patience of flea are extremely troubled. To these prospective unsubcribers...good riddance and good luck finding a better forum, a better administrator/help than Fred, better technical experience and assistance, camaraderie and healthy banter. There are plenty of off- topics I choose not to indulge but you won't find me complaining. Anyway, some people in the group engage in intelligent conversation and debate while waiting to respond to yet another episode of "The frozen front wheel that won't spin." I assure all every precious KLR question/comment gets addressed in the order it was received. Brian AKA "boulder_adv_rider"

--- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, "Ed Dobson" wrote: > > --- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, Luc Legrain wrote: > > > > Ed, > > Boulder had a really good idea, maybe you could come up with one > too ? Let's hear it or " get lost ". > > I'm taking issue with the fact that Brian seems to think its OK to > refer to ALL list members as "simple, narrow-minded fools" because > many grew tired of his political and other rantings. Seems to me that > someone who refers to the list as he did "should get lost for a while". > I'm also wondering if boulder_adv_rider and traderpro2003 are the same > "fool". > > ED >