nklr 650 - hit 'n run in s.f. - no requirement for police to do

[randy perkins]

Eagle Mike wrote:

>VERY IMPORTANT - before the lever is replaced, loosen the bolt, and >see if the lever mooves. More than 9 times out of 10 it will not. If >you tap the right side of it AFTER loosening the bot, most times it >will move, but the spring will not have enough tension to mave the >lever any more. Please, don't just see if the stock lever is intact >at that point in time. Make sure the system is working properly. >Take a look at how everything works, and understand it. I've seen >many posts where the owner, just said, "opened it up and everything >was ok, but I went ahead and put the new parts in." The old parts >were probably not working right, but the system wasn't looked at >before loosening the bolt.

A group of KLRistos is forming in Minnesota for a Doohickey Party. Judson Jones is our head Guru. Mike, is the point of what you said, quoted above, to make sure that the gadget is working (or moving) after replacement? Or, said another way, are you telling us that it isn't enough to just replace old parts with new parts, you also have to make sure that things are moving, so the design is theoretically working? So when I replace the doohickey, no matter if the old one is intact or not, I should make sure that the new one isn't just frozen solid, right? I did not overlook what you said about "Take a look at how everything works, and understand it.", but quite honestly, I dunno that I'm ever gonna understand it. I'm gonna replace parts, so that I don't have to worry about the d@mn thing breaking, but I haven't got a clue as to what the doohickey really does - or is supposed to do. Thanks. randy perkins northfield mn --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Paul Wilson]

IANAL, and not to get all lawyerly on everyone, but the State does not have duty or obligation, under the Constitution or federal civil rights statutes, as interpreted by the courts, to protect its citizens with police services. The relevant case is DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services (109 S.Ct. 998, 1989; 489 U.S. 189 (1989)) http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=489&invol=189

On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 16:58:58 -0000, Rick wrote: > > > No, actually that is not the case, in a nut shell... > > Rick > > > In short; The police officers job is to gather data, funds, and > customers > > for the lawyers, and legal system. In a nut shell... > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Michael T" > > To: "'ltslpr'" > > Cc: DSN_klr650@yahoogroups.com> > > Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2005 11:07 PM > > Subject: RE: [DSN_KLR650] Re: NKLR 650 - Hit 'n Run in S.F. - no > requirement > > for police to do the followup > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > US citizens are falsely educated to think that law enforcement > means that > > > they are to be 'protected' -- Paul in DC - www.wilsonline.org 95 VFR - 90 KLR