just picked'er up
-
- Posts: 650
- Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2004 9:32 am
On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 12:25:47PM -0400, russell_dixon@... wrote: > > Wonder how the fatalities correspond with the type of motorcycle ridden? > One would assume most would be the sport bikes (crotch-rockets), but it > would be interesting to see what the statistics say... > -- ___ ______ _____ __ ________ ___ / _ |< < / == / ___/__ / /_ /_ __/ / __ ____ _ ___ /__ \ / __ |/ // / ****/ (_ / _ \/ __/ / / / _ \/ // / ' \/ _ \ /__/ /_/ |_/_//_/ == \___/\___/\__/ /_/ /_//_/\_,_/_/_/_/ .__/ (_) 8600 miles*Russel Lines*Supertrapp Race* /_/ http://www.kingsqueak.org/klr650/
As soon as you're born, you're dying. Do you have stats for how many people died on their couch in front of the TV? I'll bet it's a lot higher... Don't get shitfaced and ride, and have a motorcycle endorsement on your license, you'll be OK. Thanks CA Stu> FATALITY FACTS:
> FATALITY FACTS: > MOTORCYCLES > 2002 > Other Institute documents on motorcycles > > > Motorcycles are less stable and less visible than cars, and they > have high performance capabilities. For these and other reasons, > motorcycles are more likely than cars to be in crashes. And when > motorcycles crash, their riders lack the protection of an enclosed > vehicle, so they're more likely to be injured or killed. Per mile > traveled, the number of deaths on motorcycles is about 26 times the > number in cars.1
In the last few years the under 30 motorcyclist on a crotch rocket has been supposed by over 40 crowd cruiser as the demographics group most likely to have a fatal accident on a motorcycle. The most common way for the over 40 crowd to bite it is a single bike accident where they fail to negotiate a turn. BTW, its starting to look as if there is a rational explanation has to why motorcycle deaths have been on the rise. Statisticians have been comparing numbers, It looks as if the increase in motorcycle deaths has been paralleled by a similar increase in pedestrian accidents, bicyclist accidents and the rise in SUV registration. So some accident experts started looking at some collision test data and the latest word indicates that the blocky nature of an SUV causes more damaged to the human body than a sedan does. The article was reading pointed out that if you took all the motorcyclist against SUV data out, we are still seeing a decline in the number of accidents, and when you look at just the SUV fatality data its like 2X - 3X the rate of motorcyclist against sedans. So it looks as if SUVs are the cause of the increase. Pat G'ville, Nv [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]> > > Wonder how the fatalities correspond with the type of motorcycle ridden? > One would assume most would be the sport bikes (crotch-rockets), but it > would be interesting to see what the statistics say... > > >
In the last few years the under 30 motorcyclist on a crotch rocket has been supposed by over 40 crowd cruiser as the demographics group most likely to have a fatal accident on a motorcycle. The most common way for the over 40 crowd to bite it is a single bike accident where they fail to negotiate a turn. BTW, its starting to look as if there is a rational explanation has to why motorcycle deaths have been on the rise. Statisticians have been comparing numbers, It looks as if the increase in motorcycle deaths has been paralleled by a similar increase in pedestrian accidents, bicyclist accidents and the rise in SUV registration. So some accident experts started looking at some collision test data and the latest word indicates that the blocky nature of an SUV causes more damaged to the human body than a sedan does. The article was reading pointed out that if you took all the motorcyclist against SUV data out, we are still seeing a decline in the number of accidents, and when you look at just the SUV fatality data its like 2X - 3X the rate of motorcyclist against sedans. So it looks as if SUVs are the cause of the increase. Pat G'ville, Nv [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] List sponsored by Dual Sport News at www.dualsportnews.com. List FAQ courtesy of Chris Krok at: www.bigcee.com/klr650faq.html Unsubscribe by sending a blank message to: DSN_klr650-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com . Yahoo! Groups Links ________________________________________________________ THIS E-MAIL AND ANY ATTACHMENT(S) TRANSMITTED WITH IT MAY BE CONFIDENTIAL. YOU MAY NOT DISCLOSE, RE-TRANSMIT, COPY, DISTRIBUTE, OR ACT IN RELIANCE ON THE INFORMATION UNLESS YOU ARE SO AUTHORISED. YOKOHAMA TYRE AUSTRALIA PTY. LIMITED DOES NOT REPRESENT, WARRANT OR GUARANTEE THAT THE INTEGRITY OF THIS COMMUNICATION HAS BEEN MAINTAINED NOR THAT THE COMMUNICATION IS FREE OF VIRUSES OR ERRORS. IF YOU RECEIVED THIS E-MAIL IN ERROR, PLEASE IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY postmaster@.... ________________________________________________________ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]> > > Wonder how the fatalities correspond with the type of motorcycle ridden? > One would assume most would be the sport bikes (crotch-rockets), but it > would be interesting to see what the statistics say... > > >
No.>Am I the only one who hates SUV's ? >
It has reached epidemic proportions here in the US. The latest, most ridiculous example is the H-2, AKA the Hummer. The H2 is basically a short-wheelbase Chevy Suburban. 6,000lbs, 13mpg, enormous blind spot out the rear window.> It makes me so mad all these city rambos in giant 2 tonne trucks who >only use them to drive down the shops or take the kids to school. The only >off road use they get is when it gets parked on the footpath to get >polished. >
Here's where you've hit it right on. They're not cars, they should require more instruction and training. I skipped the bit about Asian drivers, here in NYC there are so many crap drivers it's not possible to narrow it down by race. Since 95% of all automobiles are driven by the sole occupant, when fuel gets really expensive these things won't be so cool anymore. Devon> They aren't appropriate for city driving , should be taxed off the >road and to drive one should require a truck licence. >
> >
--- In DSN_klr650@yahoogroups.com, kdxkawboy@a... wrote: > In a message dated 2004-08-22 3:30:31 PM Pacific Daylight Time, > sidneyfeather@m... writes: > > > and its a 2003 green klr with good power and accceleration . it was > > about a hundred miles or so on a 2 lane hiway going through beach > > towns and some stop and go to get to my residence . the only thing i > > will improve soon is brakes because i see a need for more bite in > > traffic . the exhaust note takes some getting used to as the last > > time i rode something that sounded like this klr was when i was > > riding a brit twin that was running on one cylinder . yeah , the > > bike is lightweight , handles and runs good and seems to be pretty > > simple and functional . ----- i didn't see another klr but harleys > > and clones were all over the place . yep , i like this bike and i'm > > thinking that i'll have it for a long time !!! > > > > yea, the bike is lightweight, handles and runs good and seems to be pretty > simple and functional ... sounds like we have another KLRista. > > Pat > G'ville, Nv > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 75 guests