This is why one should never let their brother-in-law have an email
 address.  He posts incriminating pictures :>( .  
  
 But yes, Bob got the bike pointed to at the sky and pumped the water out
 of the engine through the exhaust, drained the float bowl and got it
 going again.  We changed the oil/water emulsion a few miles later, and
 again when we got home.
  
 Dominic
 
 -----Original Message-----
 From: 
DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com [mailto:
DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com] On
 Behalf Of husabob
 Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 11:01 AM
 To: 
DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [DSN_KLR650] Re: KLR vs my other bikes
 
 
 
 I guess you were lucky to have your pesky brother in law along to 
 take photos and get your KLR running again!! :>)~ I put all of the 
 photos on the Yahoo KLR site, in an album titled "Maine Fall of '06" 
 for everyones viewing pleasure.
 
 --- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogro 
 ups.com, "Dominic Breen" 
  wrote:
 
 >
 > I concur. For rough off roading, there is no substitute for 
  
a 'true'
 
 > dirt bike. Also, the deep woods are no place for a back injury. 
 > 
 > The KLR (as much as I love it) is a pig when laying down. I am 
  
6'1",
 
 > 265, fairly strong (boxed competitively till 43), but strain to 
  
pick-up
 
 > the KLR when it is horizontal in difficult terrain. In Maine last
 > month I hit a submerged log and wound up laying virtually underwater
 > with the KLR beside me. The engine flooded with water before I 
  
could
 
 > lift the bike. (photo attached).
 > 
 > The bike needs an airbag!
 > 
 > Regards,
 > 
 > Dominic
 > 
 > 
 > -----Original Message-----
 > From: DSN_KLR650@yahoogro 
  
ups.com 
 [mailto:DSN_KLR650@yahoogro 
 ups.com] On
 
 > Behalf Of Devon Jarvis
 > Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2006 9:50 AM
 > To: DSN_KLR650@yahoogro  ups.com
 > Subject: [DSN_KLR650] KLR vs my other bikes
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > > If the top of the bike is down hill I simply cannot lift it. The 
 > > options are
 > > to drag or lever it around which doesn't do things much good; or 
  
to 
 
 > > get help
 > > to heave it up.
 > 
 > Norm, that has little to do with being 58- I'm 35, 5'8" 155lbs and 
 > lifting the 650 back onto the wheels was a big hassle. If it fell 
  
in an 
 
 > unlucky position, then I would need help.
 > 
 > >
 > > Lowering links really helped in the lifting department too as the 
  
bike
 
 > 
 > > 1
 > > 1/2" closer to the tire. If anyone doesn't think that 1 1/2" is 
 > > significant
 > > in lifting, try a bike with links. Much easier to lift.
 > 
 > I was going to speculate on other areas where 1 1/2" are 
  
significant, 
 
 > but I think everyone gets your meaning (and good for you staying on 
 > topic).
 > 
 > I just got cleared for exercise by the surgeon who repaired my 
  
hernia 
 
 > six weeks ago. Two weeks before plus six weeks after, makes two 
  
months 
 
 > of no bicycling, no dirtbikes, no gym, etc. I'm going riding next 
  
week.
 
 > 
 > My point is, not riding sucks. If you could ride another five or 
  
ten 
 
 > years by changing to a bike that is better suited to your body and 
 > riding abilities, you'd be crazy not to do it. Even for a large, 
  
fit 
 
 > 27yo, a KLR650 is no joke to pick up when it's upside down in the 
 > rocks.
 > 
 > If you want a road bike that you could take down dirt roads and 
  
easy 
 
 > trails loaded with camping gear, nothing beats a KLR650. If you 
  
want a 
 
 > bike to challenge yourself in the woods, get something for trail 
  
riding 
 
 > that's lightweight and has proper throttle response- WR-250, KTM 
  
450 
 
 > EXC, Husky TE-250, CRF-230, etc. The KTM and the Husky are street 
 > legal, the Japanese trail bikes are not. I hate to say it, since I 
  
did 
 
 > tons of trail riding on a KLR650, but trail riding is more fun on a 
 > bike that's meant to be there. Even a KLR250 is too heavy, and 
  
lacks 
 
 > suspension.
 > 
 > The first enduro I entered (on a KLR650) I got passed by a 58yo 
 > grandmother on a KDX200. She hadn't been riding long either.
 > 
 > Devon
 > 
 > Brooklyn
 > '78 SR500
 > '01 KL250 Super Sherpa
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
 >
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
  
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]