I don't remember where I read this, but Lance said that after cancer
 treatements destroyed his body he decided that he wanted to rebuild it
 into the perfect biking physique. He used to be a triathelete I do
 believe and so his upper body was a lot larger than it needed to be for
 biking only. So after he kicked cancer he focused on training, more
 training, and more training.
 	A very dear friend of mine had a rare form of bone marrow cancer that
 we think she's kicked. She's been free from tumors for the past three
 years but she's no where near as atheletic as she once was, and she
 really can't be... The drugs that they have her on give her naseua,
 dizziness, all sorts of nasty GI problems and she's always tired. And
 these are just the drugs to help her recover from the drugs they gave
 her while she had cancer!
 	So personally I think that the argument that Lance's cancer treatments
 have made him super-human are total bullshit. The only thing that makes
 that guy so damn fast his is training.  Jeez, why do people insist on
 picking apart someone else's great achievements... Can't we all just
 admire the guy for who he is and what he's done?
 	I feel like Bierdo today, posting crap every five minutes 

 
 ------------------
 Zack
 Banana Republic of Washington, DC
 KLR650A5 "Buster" | KLR650A2 | ZG1000A1 | KZ440A2 | KX125G1 | 1966 Vespa
 125
 COG #4664
 
 
 > -----Original Message-----
 > From: Jim Niday [mailto:jcniday@...]
 > Sent: Friday, August 03, 2001 4:01 PM
 > To: kawasaki klr650 group
 > Subject: [DSN_klr650] Re: exercise (NKLR) ignorance alert
 >
 >
 > Hey all,
 > Correct me if I'm wrong, but hasn't Lance Armstrong been
 > battling the big C
 > for the past few years? If so, no question that he's on
 > drugs. Wouldn't any
 > drug that he might be taking to control the spread of cancer,
 > naturally, (or
 > unnaturally) improve his performance? just a thought.
 > Jim Niday
 >
 >