cam chain tension
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2012 7:01 pm
My 2001 KLR had an issue with the petcock and when engine was running it squirted fuel out the corner of the petcock right onto the starter.
Rebuild kit that the closed up now local shop had covered in dust fixed that problem.
Nowadays somebody is making kit that makes it a normal on/off/res petcock. No vacuum needed.
Dooden
A15 Green Ape
--- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, Tam a'Rack wrote: > > My 1983 Honda CB650SC (Nighthawk) has never had an issue with the vacuum petcock leaking. > I have never had a bike with a vacuum petcock that did have an issue with the vacuum part... > My 1981 Goldwing has almost 200k on it and has not had a petcock problem. > > I have had (and still have) a number of older bikes, and I can not recall ever having a vacuum related petcock problem. > > (other than the vacuum hose coming off or cracking, but that is not the petcocks problem) > > Of course, 99% of the time I turn the petcock to off when I park the bike for more than a couple of hours. > > So I may be skewing the stats a bit. > > Anyhow, I will play with the fool thing when I get a chance and see if it is or is not a problem... > > > Tam > > > > ________________________________ > From: Jud > To: DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2012 1:55 PM > Subject: [DSN_KLR650] Re: Cam chain tension > > > > > > --- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, "John Biccum" wrote: > > Rather than trying to get the vacuum-operated petcock to work > > properly, I'd convert the stock petcock to full-manual or fit an aftermarket > > petcock (e.g Pingel, ~$100) > > > > > > > > I have to disagree here. Replacing the diaphragm is the simplest fix there is. (Converting to gravity is pretty simple, but a straight parts swap is easier still.) My vacuum petcock was trouble free for close to 50,000 miles. The only reason I converted was because i had Jeff Saline's kit on hand, and would have had to wait for the stock parts. There's nothing wrong with converting, but I'd be hard put to call the stock system troublesome or unreliable. > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >