On Oct 23, 2008, at 2:35 PM, Silver Duck wrote:
> 1. The KTM my friend had on the TAT took over an hour to change the
> oil. 4 plugs to pull, two drains, and two filters. 5 minutes to
> change on the KLR.
The most comparable KTM to the KLR is the 690 Enduro. I happen to own
and actively ride both, so I thought I'd chime in. You're right that
it can take longer to do a full oil change on a KTM, as most KTM
engines (including the 690) have two oil filters to change and two
nylon screens to clean. In practice, especially on the trail, you can
ignore the screens.
> 2. It seemed to HATE water.... any crossing we made over 6 inches
> deep made the thing run like an egg beater. The KLR thinks it is a
> submarine.
I haven't been fortunate enough to do any water crossings on either
bike yet, so I can't provide a comparison.
> 3. The jetting was a pain..... at altitude, it would not pull at all
> past 3k rpm. We had to stop, find a shop, and rejet. Again, time off
> of the trail.
The 690 is fuel injected and it runs just fine regardless of the
altitude much like the KLR.
> Newer models of KTM's may be more user friendly (I probably could
> argue that one, but won't, as I watched a friend on a 520 EXC
> overheat and steam its way out of the woods)
Apparently so! I've heard of the overheating problems with some of the
EXCs, but the 690 has a very sufficient cooling system.
> KTM's are peppy bikes and the suspension is awesome..... but it is
> like dating a supermodel...great for a one nighter but do you wanna
> marry it?
I guess that makes me a polygamist?

--
Blake Sobiloff
http://www.sobiloff.com/>
San Jose, CA (USA)
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]