Page 1 of 2
need your opinion on the oil burn issue ?
Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 5:56 pm
by AnanthR
Some of you will recall my earlier post stating that my 08 KLR 650
had a engine seizure on the freeway. I subsequently had my bike towed
to the dealer and was trying to get Kawasaki to honor the warranty
(which was still valid at that time) for what I believe is a
manufacturers defect. I believe that the bike simply used up way too
much oil. Kawasaki's claim is that I abused the bike by not checking
on the oil. For my part :
1. I got the bike serviced at 700 miles.
2. At 2200 miles, I noticed the engine oil was very low, so I
replaced the existing oil (about 500cc left in the bike at that time)
and put in 2.5 ltrs.
3. I took an appointment for the 4000 mile service and was hoping to
bring up the issue with the dealer.
4. Day before I was bring in my appointment, the bike quit.
While I agree, that I should check my oil level every single day (
as also the brakes, the tires, the lights, the weather...), I do not
believe that a 4 stroke bike that has only been ever used for
commuting should use up 2.5 liters of oil in little over 1800 miles.
That I believe is a manufacturer's defect and is a major safety
concern.
I truely believe Kawasaki needs to address the issue with oil
consumption on the bike. What do you guys think ?
need your opinion on the oil burn issue ?
Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 6:15 pm
by Andrus Chesley
>
> While I agree, that I should check my oil level every single day (
> as also the brakes, the tires, the lights, the weather...), I do not
> believe that a 4 stroke bike that has only been ever used for
> commuting should use up 2.5 liters of oil in little over 1800 miles.
I think it's an known fact that running these 08 bikes at speed will
cause them to really suck oil due to the oil rings being a new type.
That should raise an alarm in a persons head to check the oil on said
machine way more often than usual. My usual is to check oil level on
what ever bike I'm fixing to take out of the garage that morning. It's
just not that hard with the sight glass right there looking at you. On
that bike, I think I would check it every time I went to start it.

Is Kawasaki going to do anything about it? Doubt it. Years ago when I
worked at a Kaw Yama dealer, the kawa reps were the hardest to deal
with unless you got the right one. I know I used to hang up if the
wrong one answered the phone > No use wasting time trying to reason
with him. Yama was not hardly a problem ever.
Andy in Jennings, La.
need your opinion on the oil burn issue ?
Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 6:38 pm
by traderpro2003
I agree with you a new engine should not burn oil. Furthermore if
this is happening with several machines, it ought to be recalled.
This reminds me of American cars back in the 70s and 80s and makers
did nothing but ignore it. Just look at the doohickey. It is a very
unreliable part and Kaw knows it. Yet it does nothing.
My engine didn't sieze but I ran mine low on oil and it cost me
$1,100 to have it overhauled. I had 14k incredible miles so no
complaints here having to spend that. I was more upset at myself.
Had I been more diligent, I wouldn't have had a problem, too. I
don't want to sound like I'm adding insult but when you noticed it
burning oil at 2,200 miles, immediately it should have gone right to
the dealer. Burning that much oil is unacceptable.
I'm not surprised Kaw is going to do nothing. Having been through a
similar situation (but entirely my fault), I'd take the experience
and immediately have the engine overhauled. If the dealer isn't
willing to do it for a very reasonable price (and you're comfortable
with it), I'd be on the phone with Schnitz (Cary) as some have
recommended here. It's best for peace of mind to move on. Millions
of miles await us, so the longer you delay getting your ride fixed
the more they slip away.
Truly, I'm sorry to hear this. Unfortunately, I don't know Kaw is
famous for bending over backwards for us 'budget conscious'
customers. The KLR is relatively less expensive for a reason. And
still even with an $1,100 repair order it's a lot less than other
bikes (manufacturers) that would likely do more for you. However,
admittedly, checking the oil now has become a top priority. Getting
schooled $1,100 taught me that running out of oil in the middle of a
desert could have been life-threatening. I'll take the expensive but
benign lesson in 5th gear. Good luck.
- Brian
need your opinion on the oil burn issue ?
Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 7:04 pm
by matteeanne@yahoo.com
Not sure if anyone has heard this yet, but my dealer told me Kawi is allowing 1 quart for 750 miles as acceptable My 08 is burning 1 every 800
Sean Brown
Looking for the perfect gift for the wife/Mom/or "the person who has everything?"
www.brownsbirdestates.com
To:
DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2008 4:38:14 PM
Subject: [DSN_KLR650] Re: Need your opinion on the oil burn issue ?
I agree with you a new engine should not burn oil. Furthermore if
this is happening with several machines, it ought to be recalled.
This reminds me of American cars back in the 70s and 80s and makers
did nothing but ignore it. Just look at the doohickey. It is a very
unreliable part and Kaw knows it. Yet it does nothing.
My engine didn't sieze but I ran mine low on oil and it cost me
$1,100 to have it overhauled. I had 14k incredible miles so no
complaints here having to spend that. I was more upset at myself.
Had I been more diligent, I wouldn't have had a problem, too. I
don't want to sound like I'm adding insult but when you noticed it
burning oil at 2,200 miles, immediately it should have gone right to
the dealer. Burning that much oil is unacceptable.
I'm not surprised Kaw is going to do nothing. Having been through a
similar situation (but entirely my fault), I'd take the experience
and immediately have the engine overhauled. If the dealer isn't
willing to do it for a very reasonable price (and you're comfortable
with it), I'd be on the phone with Schnitz (Cary) as some have
recommended here. It's best for peace of mind to move on. Millions
of miles await us, so the longer you delay getting your ride fixed
the more they slip away.
Truly, I'm sorry to hear this. Unfortunately, I don't know Kaw is
famous for bending over backwards for us 'budget conscious'
customers. The KLR is relatively less expensive for a reason. And
still even with an $1,100 repair order it's a lot less than other
bikes (manufacturers) that would likely do more for you. However,
admittedly, checking the oil now has become a top priority. Getting
schooled $1,100 taught me that running out of oil in the middle of a
desert could have been life-threatening. I'll take the expensive but
benign lesson in 5th gear. Good luck.
- Brian
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
need your opinion on the oil burn issue ?
Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 7:15 pm
by Jeff Saline
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 17:04:56 -0700 (PDT) matteeanne@... writes:
> Not sure if anyone has heard this yet, but my dealer told me Kawi is
> allowing 1 quart for 750 miles as acceptable My 08 is burning 1
> every 800
>
> Sean Brown
<><><><><><><><><>
<><><><><><><><><>
Sean,
Any idea of what speed they're talking. There is a bit more engine use
in 1st and 2nd gear for 750 miles than in 4th and 5th.
I wonder how they figure it out? Do they add oil and then safety wire
the filler and drain so nobody can mess with it?
I think I'd ask and then go on a 750 mile trip in 3rd gear at 6k rpm.
I'm sure they'd be impressed when I returned. : )
Best,
Jeff Saline
ABC # 4412 South Dakota Airmarshal
Airheads Beemer Club
www.airheads.org
The Beautiful Black Hills of South Dakota
75 R90/6, 03 KLR650, 79 R100RT
____________________________________________________________
Click for a credit repair consultation, raise your FICO score.
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2141/fc/Ioyw6i3m2LaZqGDhr1QtsnRd3CuKC5HJvwF6MHebCQgRhjFnzuCr0w/
need your opinion on the oil burn issue ?
Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 7:28 pm
by nakedwaterskier
My opinion is the 08s are junk; just like when most cars in CA were
lemons in 1975 because it was the first yr of radical smog devices.
Evidently Kawasaki changed the rings because of smog issues. Kawasaki
should have left the rings alone and gone to fuel injection.
On the 08s the wiring chafes. Also, the turn signals just fall off.
You should be able to find a low mileage engine on Ebay.
Look for an 07 or older!
Kawasaki was negligent about the Doohickeys for so long; I doubt
that Kawasaki will help you out.
Jeffrey
need your opinion on the oil burn issue ?
Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 8:06 pm
by E.L. Green
--- In
DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, "nakedwaterskier"
wrote:
> should have left the rings alone and gone to fuel injection.
My other bike is fuel injected. You can't bump start it because the
fuel pump has to be going. The fuel filter is inside the fuel tank and
when it clogs up you have to take the fuel tank off and turn it upside
down and take out the fuel pump to change the filter. If you run the
tank dry, the fuel pump burns out. The fuel pump itself uses over 50
watts of power and requires a much larger/heavier alternator and
battery than the KLR. This seems to be true of every fuel-injected
bike out there. For a simple, durable bike intended to be used in
harsh conditions, I'll take a good ole' gravity-fed carburetor, thank
you very much!
_E
need your opinion on the oil burn issue ?
Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 10:17 pm
by dooden
AMEN !!!!
Dooden
A15 Green Ape
--- In
DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, "E.L. Green" wrote:
>
> --- In
DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, "nakedwaterskier"
> wrote:
> > should have left the rings alone and gone to fuel injection.
>
> My other bike is fuel injected. You can't bump start it because the
> fuel pump has to be going. The fuel filter is inside the fuel tank and
> when it clogs up you have to take the fuel tank off and turn it upside
> down and take out the fuel pump to change the filter. If you run the
> tank dry, the fuel pump burns out. The fuel pump itself uses over 50
> watts of power and requires a much larger/heavier alternator and
> battery than the KLR. This seems to be true of every fuel-injected
> bike out there. For a simple, durable bike intended to be used in
> harsh conditions, I'll take a good ole' gravity-fed carburetor, thank
> you very much!
>
> _E
>
need your opinion on the oil burn issue ?
Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 11:06 pm
by traderpro2003
One quart in 750 miles? This is less than 500 riding miles when I
factor in tire spin.

I'm often in the 6-7k rpm range and never burn oil. You'd think Kawa
would make this new model debut even better yet I can't believe what
I'm hearing with these 08s. It's not the end of the world but
burning oil in this day and age? Where is the love??
I rode hot and hard my 2004 some 5k miles throughout Baja and never
added oil. I got an oil change in La Paz but never had to carry any
or worry. Hell, I wouldn't blame a one of these owners for being
upset enough to scrap the thing and throw a saddle on the local
junkyard dog.
--- In
DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, Jeff Saline wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 17:04:56 -0700 (PDT) matteeanne@... writes:
> > Not sure if anyone has heard this yet, but my dealer told me Kawi
is
> > allowing 1 quart for 750 miles as acceptable My 08 is burning 1
> > every 800
> >
> > Sean Brown
> <><><><><><><><><>
> <><><><><><><><><>
>
> Sean,
>
> Any idea of what speed they're talking. There is a bit more engine
use
> in 1st and 2nd gear for 750 miles than in 4th and 5th.
>
> I wonder how they figure it out? Do they add oil and then safety
wire
> the filler and drain so nobody can mess with it?
>
> I think I'd ask and then go on a 750 mile trip in 3rd gear at 6k
rpm.
> I'm sure they'd be impressed when I returned. : )
>
> Best,
>
> Jeff Saline
> ABC # 4412 South Dakota Airmarshal
> Airheads Beemer Club
www.airheads.org
> The Beautiful Black Hills of South Dakota
> 75 R90/6, 03 KLR650, 79 R100RT
> ____________________________________________________________
> Click for a credit repair consultation, raise your FICO score.
>
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2141/fc/Ioyw6i3m2LaZqGDhr1QtsnRd3C
uKC5HJvwF6MHebCQgRhjFnzuCr0w/
>
need your opinion on the oil burn issue ?
Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 11:12 pm
by Russell Scott
The new fuel injection they are using in the dirt bikes doesn't need any of
that stuff. Hopefully they will adapt it to the KLR soon.
Kawasaki has unveiled its 2009 motocross range, and the big news is that the
KX450F will join Suzuki's RM-Z450 in the electronic fuel-injection stakes
next year. Both the 450F and 250F will benefit from significant upgrades to
both the engine and chassis.
R
-----Original Message-----
From:
DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com [mailto:
DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com]On
Behalf Of E.L. Green
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2008 6:06 PM
To:
DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [DSN_KLR650] Re: Need your opinion on the oil burn issue ?
--- In
DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, "nakedwaterskier"
wrote:
> should have left the rings alone and gone to fuel injection.
My other bike is fuel injected. You can't bump start it because the
fuel pump has to be going. The fuel filter is inside the fuel tank and
when it clogs up you have to take the fuel tank off and turn it upside
down and take out the fuel pump to change the filter. If you run the
tank dry, the fuel pump burns out. The fuel pump itself uses over 50
watts of power and requires a much larger/heavier alternator and
battery than the KLR. This seems to be true of every fuel-injected
bike out there. For a simple, durable bike intended to be used in
harsh conditions, I'll take a good ole' gravity-fed carburetor, thank
you very much!
_E
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]