bikes to own, bikes to lust for, bikes to ride.
Posted: Wed May 07, 2008 9:05 am
LIving in a climate I spend most of the winter months reading
magazines, spending most of my time "wanting". Wanting to ride,
wanting to buy, wanting to shine, wanting to wrench. I spend
countless hours figuring how much cash I'll need to satisfy my lust.
I've got 4 bikes but still, I'm not satisfied. Then spring comes and
my whole perspective changes. I thought about it and here's what I
came up with; There are bikes to own, bikes to want and bikes to
ride.
The exotics are the bikes to lust for. Ducati, Aprilia, MV Augusta,
maybe even BMW or Harley. They are all about show and exhileration.
They really dont' make economic sense. Never mind that they spend so
much time in the shop, or they are so fast and noisy, not so
comfortable or the parts are made of "unobtainium". They are also
typically high owner maintenance bikes.
Then there are the bikes to own. These would be the classic Triumphs,
airhead BMW's, maybe an old Harley, you know, bikes that are just
cool to talk about. The ones everybody knows something about. "I've
got a BMW, yeh, an airhead, an R90. R90what? Oh, just a /6". Which is
usually followed by "I used to have one of those and maybe some day---
" yadayada.
Then there are the bikes to ride. This is the domain of the Japanese
motorcycle. Typically reliable, inexpensive and pretty comfortable.
Usually minimum maintainance, reasonably good handling and so on.
Most of us land here. This is the land of the compromise motorcycle.
Good at many things, best at none. This is also where the KLR rules.
Its the best at nothing, good at everything and are readily
available. The new Versys even picked its name after mediocrity, "
versatile-system". Oh, you thought it stood for veritable sysboombah?
NO, I'm afraid it was contrived as a compromise. Corny, but true.
Now I look at my garage, at my R90,(its a /6) my Connie, my RM125 at
the KLR and think, maybe one bike really is enough. Time to go ride.
Ride often, ride safe.