Regarding MS Demon/Hellcat
>> The MS Hellcat will also work but the Demon provides the best shape/protection, IMO.
> The Hellcat looks like it would be better able to fit on a bike with handguards, due to the lack of the
> extensions to the sides. Or can the Demon be fitted to go above handguards?
=====Both the Hellcat and Demon will work with the handguards, no modification. The Hellcat has more curvature
thus will hit the OEM windscreen a bit more when full turning the bars such as in parking manipulation. Under
riding conditions, no issues with either. The Demon is the way to go, IMO, as the outside extensions offer more
protection, with the handguards coming into play where the extensions stop. The Demon has less curvature or is
slightly 'flatter' and gives a broader frontal surface. The less curvature means less contact with the OEM
windscreen. It also works best with the OEM screen removed.
>
> Others have used the Slipstreamer CF-30 but have had problems with the provided hardware breaking (basically
> even hardware store kit works better). It is much cheaper than the MS stuff (you can get a CF30 for under
> $50), but...
>
====Yes, the MS is really high priced. I think it has gone up nearly 50% since I last ordered a Demon for my
FZ. I had the Hellcat I had tired on the FZ so experimented with it. Then took the Demon off the FZ for a
comparison. I left the FZ's Demon on the KLR and ordered a new Demon for the FZ.
====The only issue I have had to date with the Demon is that while riding NEMO gravel the stock tires apparently
are tossing a stone up into the air and forward every so often with the bike catching up and the shield is
getting hit. After several of those hits, there was one small peck in the shield. It is/was not constant and
depends mainly on the gravel type, usually fairly large pieces of loose gravel. It was not happening on dirt
and 'chip' size gravel. The one shield peck is hard to notice and has not starred outward. Due the price of
this shield one would have to weigh the kind of rock/gravel surface to use it on and under what style of riding
on those surfaces. All that would be a personal choice. Unless the mounting hardware starts to show breakage
or the shield breaks at the hardware/shield interface, the MS should work great for various kinds of
commuting/dual touring, etc. The Demon has certainly fit the bill for all round riding on the FZ, but the KLR
is vibrating the shield and mounts much more severely.
====I had always fought National Cycle's mediocre mounting hardware so was more than pleased with the quality of
MS on my FZ. It has never shown any sign of fatigue or coming loose. Since the fasteners on the MS are steel
and the threads in the bar mounts, etc. are billet AL, one has to be very careful not to over tighten and strip
the AL threads. Thus no ratchet mounted hex bits, IMO, only hand tightening with the supplied hex wrench.
====I tried both the Hellcat and Demon on the KLR, as I did with the FZ. Both shields install easily and
function well, with the Demon being my choice hands down, but I could live with the Hellcat on either. I am a
shield, rather than a screen fan, for many kinds of riding and certainly in cold, wet, dangerous road conditions
and long trips, or just getting the wind off for sight seeing. There may be other manufacturers with as good a
product, but since the MS works so well for me, I do not pay attention to the market. I only use NS shields
when forced too because of model fit.
===As stated, I only have about 1k miles on the KLR Demon and cannot testify to how long it will hold up, or
under what conditions/riding style they will not hold up. However, a very high percentage of my KLR riding will
be a combination of hard surface and gravel with some dirt road/trail. So if the mounting hardware and
mounting points hold to the KLR vibrations, the shield will work great for me. Only future riding time/miles
will let me know from experience how it is going to hold up. I will leave the Demon on the KLR until it breaks
or until needing removed for something more technical than my usual riding. If I were heading out on a trip
with serious technical riding challenges I would weigh removing the MS. However, if I were adventure touring on
roads/trails in most areas, I would want the environmental protection of an MS or similar shield. Just depends
on ones riding style and objective of their rides. I am not trying to 'sell' the idea of a shield, just passing
on what I think may be a viable option for many riders.
Regards, Z
*****All outgoing email & attachments are scanned with updated Norton Antivirus*****
****From American's Hometown, Mark Twain's Hometown****]
Barry Zbornik, Hannibal, Missouri
Primary Email: iowaz@...
Secondary Email: iowaz@...
Real Motorcycles:
http://www.angelfire.com/ia/z/sitemap.html
2005 Kawasaki KLR650, dual purpose, go anywhere at anytime.
2003 Yamaha R6: Silver, Yoshimura RS-3 Titanium slip-on and more.
2001 Yamaha FZ1: Black, GYRT Slip-on & Ivan's Jets, plus extras, FZ1OA.
1995 Yamaha Vmax: Red, Hindle, suspension and other mods, VMOA 169.
1985 Honda V65 Magna: Black, Kerker, oil and suspension mods, SabMag.
****Go Iowa, Go Cyclones, Go Peacocks, Go Cardinals****