Page 1 of 1
reducing height for shipping purpose
Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2006 8:55 pm
by narelz
47" in height is the container spec(forward air exc container), I was
told bike measures 49" without mirrors and windscreen. will dropping
the forks in the triple clamp provide the neccessary reduction? a
couple inches would mean a $200 difference in shipping cost. thanks
reducing height for shipping purpose
Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2006 9:32 pm
by Walter Mitty
Yes. Out of morbid curiousity how much do they want to ship your bike?
narelz wrote:
47" in height is the container spec(forward air exc container), I was
told bike measures 49" without mirrors and windscreen. will dropping
the forks in the triple clamp provide the neccessary reduction? a
couple inches would mean a $200 difference in shipping cost. thanks
Archive Quicksearch at:
http://www.angelfire.com/ut/moab/klr650_data_search.html
List sponsored by Dual Sport News at:
www.dualsportnews.com
List FAQ courtesy of Chris Krok at:
www.bigcee.com/klr650faq.html
Member Map at:
http://www.frappr.com/dsnklr650
Yahoo! Groups Links
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Photos Showcase holiday pictures in hardcover
Photo Books. You design it and we ll bind it!
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
reducing height for shipping purpose
Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2006 9:50 pm
by narelz
--- In
DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, Walter Mitty
wrote:
>
> Thanks for the response. I received a quote of $488
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Archive Quicksearch at:
http://www.angelfire.com/ut/moab/klr650_data_search.html
> List sponsored by Dual Sport News at:
www.dualsportnews.com
> List FAQ courtesy of Chris Krok at:
www.bigcee.com/klr650faq.html
> Member Map at:
http://www.frappr.com/dsnklr650
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Yahoo! Photos Showcase holiday pictures in hardcover
> Photo Books. You design it and we'll bind it!
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
reducing height for shipping purpose
Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2006 10:26 pm
by Howard Morris
--- In
DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, "narelz" wrote:
> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the response. I received a quote of $488
>
> > Just a thought, but could you slide the forks up the tree that
many inches?
reducing height for shipping purpose
Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2006 10:45 pm
by Alan L Henderson
narelz wrote:
> 47" in height is the container spec(forward air exc container), I was
> told bike measures 49" without mirrors and windscreen. will dropping
> the forks in the triple clamp provide the neccessary reduction? a
> couple inches would mean a $200 difference in shipping cost. thanks
>
Remove the fork springs, take of the wind screen and roll the handle
bars back.
Alan A13 Iowa
reducing height for shipping purpose
Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2006 11:37 am
by narelz
--- In
DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, "narelz" wrote:
>
Thanks everyone for your suggestions.
Now a confession....I am soooo dumb. I made a simple task into a
complex procedure. Answer to the height issue would be to load ass
first(thanks Eduardo). Take a look you'll understand (exc container)By
no means is it a rubik's cube.
https://www.forwardair.com/prepaid/MCmainpage.jsp
sorry for not providing a clear discription of situation
Man do I need this ride through Mex/C.America to clear the cobwebs. I
have being trying to get away for the last 2-3 months but "something"
always pops up to postpone departure. I guess I am now looking for
that "something" in everything involving this trip.
>
tires opinions dunlop 607
Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2006 11:59 pm
by Doug Pippin
Shawn
I purchased my first (and only) KLR in September 2003. It had 728
miles on it and the stock tires.
They didn't offer much traction in off road condition and wore out fairly fast.
I was planning a trip on the KLR (that's another story) to Bike week
in March 2004 and the stock tires with 1700 miles didn't look like
they'd make the round trip.
Since this was a road only trip I opted for a pair of Dunlop 607's.
On the way home from Daytona I ran over something that put a big gash
in the rear tire so I had to replace it.
The 607's handled very well, and with this setup surprised many a
sport bike on the tight twisty roads we have here in western North Carolina.
They even worked OK on gravel roads but spun up a lot.
In the dirt and mud they didn't give much traction at all.
I replaced the 607's when the rear tire was worn out because I wanted
knobby tires for the dirt.
The tread on the rear tire (607) was gone with 3,126 miles and the
front had a little tread left with 4,577 miles.
If your going to ride only on the pavement the Dunlop 607's will work
quite well and gets about the same wear as any good sport bike tire.
One word of advise is that the 607 is a tubeless tire and is much
harder to install (with a tube) than a tube type tire.
Overall impression:
Very good traction
Wears out quickly (I think these two items are related)
Doug in NC
----------
At 09:54 AM 1/9/2006, you wrote:
> Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 17:54:29 -0800 (PST)
> From: Shawn Frazer
>Subject: Tires opinions Dunlop 607
>
>I have an 06 klr 650. I will do most of my riding on blacktop and I
>was looking at the Dunlop 607. Is anyone out there using this tire?
>What are your opinions on wear and handling. I was wanting a tire
>that was a longer wearing tire. My stock tires are wearing faster
>than I would like them to at 700 miles.
> Thanks
> Shawn
----------
Doug Pippin
828-684-8488
dpippin5@...
----------
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]