Page 1 of 2
klr's must suck because....
Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2004 1:34 pm
by kknorpp001
... you guys never talk about doing anything with your bikes. Just
fixing all the crap that breaks on them. Are they crap?
It reminds me of how I got into endurance sports. My thoughts were
that there must be something to it if they are willing to suffer like
that....
klr's must suck because....
Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2004 1:37 pm
by Mark St.Hilaire, Sr
> ... you guys never talk about doing anything with your bikes. Just
> fixing all the crap that breaks on them. Are they crap?
Yes they are... now go troll the Harley lists.
Mark
---------------------------------------
KLR650 Motorcycle Website:
http://klr6500.tripod.com/
klr's must suck because....
Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2004 1:49 pm
by aboyandhisdawg
yup, the crappiest crappy crap there is, so crappy yuou should immediately
sell yours (if you have one) to whomever on the list is closest for cheap. pay
for their gas and time to haul it away if you want to be fair, but some of the
fools on this list could be conned into parting with a few hundred dollars for
the privelage of taking it off your hands.
fixer
KLR A1 #1187 (anyone have older iron than mine?)
Lost Wages, NV
--- In
DSN_klr650@yahoogroups.com, "kknorpp001"
wrote:
> ... you guys never talk about doing anything with your bikes. Just
> fixing all the crap that breaks on them. Are they crap?
>
> It reminds me of how I got into endurance sports. My thoughts were
> that there must be something to it if they are willing to suffer like
> that....
klr's must suck because....
Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2004 1:56 pm
by Mark Lewis
"Yes they are... now go troll the Harley lists."
The KLR is much more reliable than any Harley. They rarely run
10,000 miles without major engine work. Proud former owner of 3.
The new TC-88 motor has tons of issues that Harley won't address.
The Sportsters give trouble too.
Mark Lewis
klr's must suck because....
Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2004 2:11 pm
by Krgrife@aol.com
In a message dated 4/30/04 11:37:36 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
kknorpp001@... writes:
> ... you guys never talk about doing anything with your bikes. Just
> fixing all the crap that breaks on them. Are they crap?
Well, how about this? Three times in the past 6 months and at least 3 times
a year for the 6 years that I have owned my '91 KLR I have ridden it to
Southern Baja (1000 miles each way) and then put 500 or so miles on it while down
there. No mechanical failures on any of those trips except for the rear stock
shock spewing its fluid. Otherwise its been 3 flat tires and nothing more. I
did have a balancer system failure in '99 but nothing after that repair and
rebuild. In addition to the Mexico trips I average about 8,000 miles/year in
California. Street and lots of fire road type riding. In fact, I think I'll go
for a ride right now--------
Kurt Grife
Avila Beach, Ca
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
klr's must suck because....
Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2004 2:26 pm
by rsanders30117
Ouch!! No need to get nasty.
KLR riders are typically chronic tinkers who love working on their
bikes. Since this bike is so simple & rugged it lends itself to home
repair & modifications. All motorcycles, cars, machines in general
have "opportunities" for improvements. Since we KLR riders like
working on our bikes, we also like to discuss what we're doing & look
for good ideas that other folks are doing.
No they're definitely not crab, the KLR is a foundation for rugged,
unique, all-purpose motorcycles. The US military chose the KLR650,
above all others, to be the basis for their motorcycle and like the
typical KLR owner, they immediately tinkered with it. What's unique
about KLR people is that we're very technically minded & like
perfecting our machines as opposed to those Harley types who are only
interested in what else they can get chromed & fancy paint jobs.
--- In
DSN_klr650@yahoogroups.com, "Mark St.Hilaire, Sr"
wrote:
> > ... you guys never talk about doing anything with your bikes.
Just
> > fixing all the crap that breaks on them. Are they crap?
>
> Yes they are... now go troll the Harley lists.
>
> Mark
> ---------------------------------------
> KLR650 Motorcycle Website:
>
http://klr6500.tripod.com/
klr's must suck because....
Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2004 2:53 pm
by Chris
No, I bought mine just to have something to maintain, it's been a
dream come true. My only complaint is that nothing ever breaks on it,
I should have just bought a Harley instead. It would have kept me
busier and the constant stench of old beer on my breath would fit the
bike's image more effectively too.
It's nice out today, I think I'll put on some flip-flops and go ride
to a bar.
> ... you guys never talk about doing anything with your bikes. Just
> fixing all the crap that breaks on them. Are they crap?
>
klr's must suck because....
Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2004 3:12 pm
by Mark St.Hilaire, Sr
> > Yes they are... now go troll the Harley lists.
> Ouch!! No need to get nasty.
You MUST know that I wrote that tongue-in-cheek. Go to Google and search for
"klr650." The website that has been the first hit for well over 1 year is my
"Mark's KLR650 Website." You can't believe that I, the owner of that
website, think that the KLR is anything other than the best two-wheeled
conveyance out there!
The guy was obviously trolling, so why entertain him by mounting a vigorous
defense. There are two groups of people out there; those who know that the
KLR is the best bike going, and those who haven't ridden one yet. I can't
imagine someone riding one and not falling in love with it. To heck with gay
marriages, I want to marry my KLR! (Grinning)
Mark
---------------------------------------
KLR650 Motorcycle Website:
http://klr6500.tripod.com/
klr's must suck because....
Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2004 3:57 pm
by Dirk Beer
On Fri, 30 Apr 2004, Mark St.Hilaire, Sr wrote:
> imagine someone riding one and not falling in love with it. To heck with gay
> marriages, I want to marry my KLR! (Grinning)
Is that because you are a "tinker"?
>KLR riders are typically chronic tinkers who love working on their
Sorry, guys, couldn't resist. (grin)
Dirk
klr's must suck because....
Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2004 4:08 pm
by Judson D. Jones
--- In
DSN_klr650@yahoogroups.com, Krgrife@a... wrote:
> In a message dated 4/30/04 11:37:36 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
> kknorpp001@y... writes:
>
> > ... you guys never talk about doing anything with your bikes. Just
> > fixing all the crap that breaks on them. Are they crap?
>
> Well, how about this? Three times in the past 6 months and at least 3 times
> a year for the 6 years that I have owned my '91 KLR I have ridden it to
> Southern Baja (1000 miles each way) and then put 500 or so miles on it
while down
> there. No mechanical failures on any of those trips except for the rear stock
> shock spewing its fluid. Otherwise its been 3 flat tires and nothing more. I
> did have a balancer system failure in '99 but nothing after that repair and
> rebuild. In addition to the Mexico trips I average about 8,000 miles/year in
> California. Street and lots of fire road type riding. In fact, I think I'll go
> for a ride right now--------
> Kurt Grife
> Avila Beach, Ca
And I thought the fishing opener was not 'til tomorrow.