nklr replys dont show up

DSN_KLR650
kknorpp001
Posts: 22
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2004 11:21 pm

klr's must suck because....

Post by kknorpp001 » Fri Apr 30, 2004 1:34 pm

... you guys never talk about doing anything with your bikes. Just fixing all the crap that breaks on them. Are they crap? It reminds me of how I got into endurance sports. My thoughts were that there must be something to it if they are willing to suffer like that....

Mark St.Hilaire, Sr

klr's must suck because....

Post by Mark St.Hilaire, Sr » Fri Apr 30, 2004 1:37 pm

> ... you guys never talk about doing anything with your bikes. Just > fixing all the crap that breaks on them. Are they crap?
Yes they are... now go troll the Harley lists. Mark --------------------------------------- KLR650 Motorcycle Website: http://klr6500.tripod.com/

aboyandhisdawg
Posts: 289
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2004 6:59 pm

klr's must suck because....

Post by aboyandhisdawg » Fri Apr 30, 2004 1:49 pm

yup, the crappiest crappy crap there is, so crappy yuou should immediately sell yours (if you have one) to whomever on the list is closest for cheap. pay for their gas and time to haul it away if you want to be fair, but some of the fools on this list could be conned into parting with a few hundred dollars for the privelage of taking it off your hands. fixer KLR A1 #1187 (anyone have older iron than mine?) Lost Wages, NV --- In DSN_klr650@yahoogroups.com, "kknorpp001" wrote:
> ... you guys never talk about doing anything with your bikes. Just > fixing all the crap that breaks on them. Are they crap? > > It reminds me of how I got into endurance sports. My thoughts were > that there must be something to it if they are willing to suffer like > that....

Mark Lewis

klr's must suck because....

Post by Mark Lewis » Fri Apr 30, 2004 1:56 pm

"Yes they are... now go troll the Harley lists." The KLR is much more reliable than any Harley. They rarely run 10,000 miles without major engine work. Proud former owner of 3. The new TC-88 motor has tons of issues that Harley won't address. The Sportsters give trouble too. Mark Lewis

Krgrife@aol.com
Posts: 806
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2000 9:32 pm

klr's must suck because....

Post by Krgrife@aol.com » Fri Apr 30, 2004 2:11 pm

In a message dated 4/30/04 11:37:36 AM Pacific Daylight Time, kknorpp001@... writes:
> ... you guys never talk about doing anything with your bikes. Just > fixing all the crap that breaks on them. Are they crap?
Well, how about this? Three times in the past 6 months and at least 3 times a year for the 6 years that I have owned my '91 KLR I have ridden it to Southern Baja (1000 miles each way) and then put 500 or so miles on it while down there. No mechanical failures on any of those trips except for the rear stock shock spewing its fluid. Otherwise its been 3 flat tires and nothing more. I did have a balancer system failure in '99 but nothing after that repair and rebuild. In addition to the Mexico trips I average about 8,000 miles/year in California. Street and lots of fire road type riding. In fact, I think I'll go for a ride right now-------- Kurt Grife Avila Beach, Ca [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

rsanders30117
Posts: 469
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2003 11:06 am

klr's must suck because....

Post by rsanders30117 » Fri Apr 30, 2004 2:26 pm

Ouch!! No need to get nasty. KLR riders are typically chronic tinkers who love working on their bikes. Since this bike is so simple & rugged it lends itself to home repair & modifications. All motorcycles, cars, machines in general have "opportunities" for improvements. Since we KLR riders like working on our bikes, we also like to discuss what we're doing & look for good ideas that other folks are doing. No they're definitely not crab, the KLR is a foundation for rugged, unique, all-purpose motorcycles. The US military chose the KLR650, above all others, to be the basis for their motorcycle and like the typical KLR owner, they immediately tinkered with it. What's unique about KLR people is that we're very technically minded & like perfecting our machines as opposed to those Harley types who are only interested in what else they can get chromed & fancy paint jobs. --- In DSN_klr650@yahoogroups.com, "Mark St.Hilaire, Sr" wrote:
> > ... you guys never talk about doing anything with your bikes.
Just
> > fixing all the crap that breaks on them. Are they crap? > > Yes they are... now go troll the Harley lists. > > Mark > --------------------------------------- > KLR650 Motorcycle Website: > http://klr6500.tripod.com/

Chris
Posts: 1250
Joined: Wed Jul 31, 2013 11:57 am

klr's must suck because....

Post by Chris » Fri Apr 30, 2004 2:53 pm

No, I bought mine just to have something to maintain, it's been a dream come true. My only complaint is that nothing ever breaks on it, I should have just bought a Harley instead. It would have kept me busier and the constant stench of old beer on my breath would fit the bike's image more effectively too. It's nice out today, I think I'll put on some flip-flops and go ride to a bar.
> ... you guys never talk about doing anything with your bikes. Just > fixing all the crap that breaks on them. Are they crap? >

Mark St.Hilaire, Sr

klr's must suck because....

Post by Mark St.Hilaire, Sr » Fri Apr 30, 2004 3:12 pm

> > Yes they are... now go troll the Harley lists. > Ouch!! No need to get nasty.
You MUST know that I wrote that tongue-in-cheek. Go to Google and search for "klr650." The website that has been the first hit for well over 1 year is my "Mark's KLR650 Website." You can't believe that I, the owner of that website, think that the KLR is anything other than the best two-wheeled conveyance out there! The guy was obviously trolling, so why entertain him by mounting a vigorous defense. There are two groups of people out there; those who know that the KLR is the best bike going, and those who haven't ridden one yet. I can't imagine someone riding one and not falling in love with it. To heck with gay marriages, I want to marry my KLR! (Grinning) Mark --------------------------------------- KLR650 Motorcycle Website: http://klr6500.tripod.com/

Dirk Beer
Posts: 123
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 6:09 am

klr's must suck because....

Post by Dirk Beer » Fri Apr 30, 2004 3:57 pm

On Fri, 30 Apr 2004, Mark St.Hilaire, Sr wrote:
> imagine someone riding one and not falling in love with it. To heck with gay > marriages, I want to marry my KLR! (Grinning)
Is that because you are a "tinker"?
>KLR riders are typically chronic tinkers who love working on their
Sorry, guys, couldn't resist. (grin) Dirk

Judson D. Jones
Posts: 1037
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2002 11:52 am

klr's must suck because....

Post by Judson D. Jones » Fri Apr 30, 2004 4:08 pm

--- In DSN_klr650@yahoogroups.com, Krgrife@a... wrote:
> In a message dated 4/30/04 11:37:36 AM Pacific Daylight Time, > kknorpp001@y... writes: > > > ... you guys never talk about doing anything with your bikes. Just > > fixing all the crap that breaks on them. Are they crap? > > Well, how about this? Three times in the past 6 months and at least 3 times > a year for the 6 years that I have owned my '91 KLR I have ridden it to > Southern Baja (1000 miles each way) and then put 500 or so miles on it
while down
> there. No mechanical failures on any of those trips except for the rear stock > shock spewing its fluid. Otherwise its been 3 flat tires and nothing more. I > did have a balancer system failure in '99 but nothing after that repair and > rebuild. In addition to the Mexico trips I average about 8,000 miles/year in > California. Street and lots of fire road type riding. In fact, I think I'll go > for a ride right now-------- > Kurt Grife > Avila Beach, Ca
And I thought the fishing opener was not 'til tomorrow.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests