Wilsons Sandbox
http://frenchandlogan.com/phpBB3/
http://frenchandlogan.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=52&t=227483
to> Is there a reason the "Reply-To" on the group web page is set > to "reply to sender" instead of "reply to group"? I have many times > sent email to the sender by accident. > > If nobody cares one way or the other I vote to change it to "reply
I second that! Trev> group". > > Thanks, > Brad Davis
)
I would vote for that, I have also sent a few using the boo-boo
factor.
Duden
--- In DSN_klr650@y..., "bradcdavis" wrote: > Is there a reason the "Reply-To" on the group web page is set > to "reply to sender" instead of "reply to group"? I have many times > sent email to the sender by accident. > > If nobody cares one way or the other I vote to change it to "reply to > group". > > Thanks, > Brad Davis
It would certainly save me a lot of typing to reset it to this as well.> Is there a reason the "Reply-To" on the group web page is set > to "reply to sender" instead of "reply to group"? I have many times > sent email to the sender by accident. > > If nobody cares one way or the other I vote to change it to "reply to > group".
Any other takers?times> > > Is there a reason the "Reply-To" on the group web page is set > > to "reply to sender" instead of "reply to group"? I have many
to "reply to> > sent email to the sender by accident. > > > > If nobody cares one way or the other I vote to change it
well.> > group". > > It would certainly save me a lot of typing to reset it to this as
I agree! I spent a lot of time typing up the pros and cons of the different fork braces and ended up sending it to one individual. -Bryan> Any other takers?
--- In DSN_klr650@y..., David Kelly wrote: > "Miata Myk" writes: > > > > > Is there a reason the "Reply-To" on the group web page is set > > > to "reply to sender" instead of "reply to group"? I have many times > > > sent email to the sender by accident. > > > > > > If nobody cares one way or the other I vote to change it to "reply to > > > group". > > > > It would certainly save me a lot of typing to reset it to this as well.
We are talking about the Yahoo Groups web based email client. Not the one on your pc or other web based client. I am on the yahoo Group Client right now. My choices are ONLY 1)the sender 2) the group and 3) the group owner. It currently defaults to #1 and I am asking if it can be changed to default to #2. There is no "Rely To All" choice available. Brad Davis> > > > How is it supposed to "save typing?" I hit "reply to all" in my > mail > > client and this message is addressed to both Miata Myk and the > KLR650 > > list. > > > > -- > > David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@h...
> > Is there a reason the "Reply-To" on the group web page is set > > to "reply to sender" instead of "reply to group"? I have many times > > sent email to the sender by accident. > > > > If nobody cares one way or the other I vote to change it to "reply to > > group". > > It would certainly save me a lot of typing to reset it to this as well.
----- Original Message ----- From: "kilrcalikawi" > --- In DSN_klr650@y..., "bradcdavis" wrote: > > Is there a reason the "Reply-To" on the group web page is set > > to "reply to sender" instead of "reply to group"? I have many times > > sent email to the sender by accident. > > > > If nobody cares one way or the other I vote to change it to "reply > to > > group". > > I second that! > Trev
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://taxes.yahoo.com/> FAR FAR better to reply to an individual when you > meant to reply to a group > instead of the other way around! I have always > understood list netiquite > that if you were replying to someones post in a > group you replied to them > and the group - ie. Reply All. There are some lists > I am on that reply goes > to the group and I hate it. Please leave this one > like it is!!!! > > _Scott_ > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "kilrcalikawi" > > --- In DSN_klr650@y..., "bradcdavis" > wrote: > > > Is there a reason the "Reply-To" on the group > web page is set > > > to "reply to sender" instead of "reply to > group"? I have many times > > > sent email to the sender by accident. > > > > > > If nobody cares one way or the other I vote to > change it to "reply > > to > > > group". > > > > I second that! > > Trev >