Page 1 of 1
					
				soft fork
				Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2001 9:03 pm
				by RichardM
				I think the last message got lost.  Sorry if this is a repeat..
 
 My front suspension feels unusually soft.  Maybe it was a slow 
 degradation and I just didn't notice until now.  Maybe it was an 
 immediate thing and something's broken.  I don't know.
 
 There are no signs of oil leakage.  Do I need to disassemble and 
 repair something / overhaul them?  Should I just install Progressive 
 springs and new oil and be done with it?
 
 The bike (A14) has 11k on it and the forks haven't been serviced in 
 any way.
 
 RM <-- forkishly ignorant and needs help...
 
 PS. Who has a good deal on the Progressive springs?
 
			 
			
					
				soft fork
				Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2001 10:04 pm
				by monahanwb@yahoo.com
				--- In DSN_klr650@y..., "RichardM"  wrote:
 
 > My front suspension feels unusually soft.  > The bike (A14) has 11k 
  
on it and the forks haven't been serviced in 
 
 > any way.
 > 
 > RM 
Why don't you do the cheap fix and drain the fork oil (easy), then 
 add about 390 ml (or thereabouts, exact accuracy is not as important 
 as the gurus would have you think) of fork oil in each tube?  You 
 might like it.  It should cost about $7.
 
 Bill
 forkin em here in Nippleopolis CA
 
			 
			
					
				soft fork
				Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2001 1:22 am
				by RichardM
				>Why don't you do the cheap fix and drain the fork oil (easy), then 
 >add about 390 ml (or thereabouts, exact accuracy is not as important 
 >as the gurus would have you think) of fork oil in each tube?  You 
 >might like it.  It should cost about $7.
 
  
I've thought about that.  It's pretty cheap to try, and it may make 
 me happy for a few months while I pay the bike off.
 
 What weight oil is in there now?
 
 What weight oil should I try with the stock springs?  I want to get 
 the bouncing under control without over-dampening the front end.  
 
 Is that 390ml per fork tube?
 
 RM
 
			 
			
					
				soft fork
				Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2001 1:52 am
				by Swede
				--- In DSN_klr650@y..., "RichardM"  wrote:
 
 > What weight oil is in there now?
 
  
Should be 10 wt. 
 
 
 > What weight oil should I try with the stock springs? 
 
  
I'd try 10 wt. first, see if it helps, if not, go to the 
 next, 15 wt.?  
 
 
 > Is that 390ml per fork tube?
 
  
Si. I think? 
 
 
 > 
 > RM 
 
			 
			
					
				soft fork
				Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2001 2:32 pm
				by Dale Johnson
				Hey RM, remember when you sat on my bike and said it sat lower than 
 yours?.. I had never changed the fork oil.. @ about 29000 miles, well 
 2 weeks ago I drained the stock muck and replaced with 15wt and also 
 put in 6in spacers (pvc pipe) instead of the 5 inch stock ones..   
 MUCH better, I am back up where I am supposed to be..
 
 Dale
 
			 
			
					
				soft fork
				Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2001 5:05 pm
				by RichardM
				--- In DSN_klr650@y..., "Dale Johnson"  wrote:
 
 
 >2 weeks ago I drained the stock muck and replaced with 15wt and also 
 >put in 6in spacers (pvc pipe) instead of the 5 inch stock ones..   
 >MUCH better, I am back up where I am supposed to be..
 
  
Stock springs?  How is that 15wt stuff?  Harsh on the freeway?
 
			 
			
					
				soft fork
				Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2001 12:32 am
				by gyb@sprynet.com
				--- In DSN_klr650@y..., "RichardM"  wrote:
 
  > My front suspension feels unusually soft.  The bike (A14)
  > has 11k on it and the forks haven't been serviced in any way.
 
  
Soft or bouncy?  Changing the fork oil with heavier stuff will
 increase the damping, which may seem to make the forks
 stiffer, but really doesn't (unless you make the damping so
 hi that it interferes with the spring action).  This will slow
 the motions of the forks (both up and down), so the bike
 wont dive so quickly.  It will still compress the same amount,
 it'll just be more controlled.  On my street bike, that was
 enough to make a significant difference in handling.
 
 If the forks compress too much, especially if you bottom
 them easily, new springs is the only real solution.
 
 Gustavo
 
			 
			
					
				not an oil thread1!!! (mobil 1) - nklr
				Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2001 4:27 pm
				by RichardM
				--- In DSN_klr650@y..., "The Squasher"  wrote:
 
 > SO would a straight 30 or 40 wt oil be better then a multigrade 
  
oil? Just 
 
 > asking.
 
  
Everything Devon posted agrees with what I believe to be true about 
 multigrade oils and additive packages.
 
 In extreme push-the-oil-beyond-the-limit circumstances, a synthetic 
 nondetergent monograde oil provides the best lubrication money can 
 buy.  Trouble is, such an oil is completely unsuitable for any normal 
 consumer application.
 
 The mass market retail monogrades probably do provide superior 
 lubrication since they have no viscosity modifiers to get broken down 
 over time, nor are they subject to the shear instability that plagues 
 viscosity modifiers and causes the effective viscosity to drop at 
 high pressures.  Will they make your bike last longer?  Maybe, maybe 
 not.  Cold start oil flow is an issue for moto engines as well as 
 cage engines.   
 
 You could say that Kawi has a good reason for specifying 
 multigrade oils.  You could also say that they are full of shit - 
 after all they also wrote the specs on the oil sight glass location, 
 the rear sub-frame bolts, the chain-driven counterbalancer subsystem, 
 the pot-metal shift lever, and the noodley forks.
 
 RM
 
			 
			
					
				soft fork
				Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2001 4:45 pm
				by RichardM
				> Soft or bouncy?
 
  
Both.  Not enough damping (it oscillates a bit after weight shifts) 
 and the spring is too soft.  I seldom bottom it, though.
 
 Tonight I'm dumping in the correct amount of 15wt oil.  I know that I 
 should also get new springs but I'm in cash conservation mode for the 
 next few months.  For $8 worth of fork oil I think it'll help quite a 
 bit.
 
 RM
 
			 
			
					
				soft fork
				Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2001 5:00 pm
				by Dale Johnson
				Dick, 
   You should make your take out the spacers and throw in some longer 
 pvc, the poor mans spring upgrade
 
 Dale
 
 > bit.
 > 
 > RM