Page 1 of 3
					
				environmental rant (nklr?)
				Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2001 8:20 am
				by pudens@telepath.com
				Don't hit send... don't do it... don't hit that dern button... they 
 dont want to read this... DONT!
 
 Alright guys, and the late Jennifer (girl of my dreams). This old 
 world has been rotating and spinning around the sun for quite some 
 time. When we say man made polution what we are referring to is stuff 
 that was here when we got here. Oh we have refined it and changed it 
 some, but IT was here long before we were. The fuel your bike runs 
 on, the plastic and rubber parts, the steel and aluminum have been 
 here affecting the environment for a long long time.
 
 When Mt. Pinatubo erupted it dumped more polutants into the world 
 environment than all industrial and vehicle emmissions AND aerosols 
 AND hydrochlorocarbons (freon) that have been produced since the 
 industrial revolution. Including 20 to 30 megatons of sulphur dioxide 
 and aerosols. The eruption of this volcano produced a large number of 
 micrometer-sized droplets (aerosols) of sulfuric acid which were 
 thrown into the stratosphere.  These particles eventually spread out 
 over the globe.  The very small droplets blocked energy coming from 
 the Sun, the result was that the Earth cooled off a little with about 
 a half degree centigrade. These volcanic droplets had also got some 
 other side effects, the particles catalyzed heterogeneous reactions 
 that were probably the cause of unusually low ozone levels. 
      The particles were also the indirect cause of the destroying of 
 part of the sea-nature in the Gulf of Akaba (180km long, 25km wide, 
 1.8km deep) because the droplets encouraged the growth of alga (which 
 is very harmful to the sea-nature). Emanations of gas can cause 
 immediate loss of life, 142 people were killed by carbon dioxide from 
 the Deng Plateau in Java. that's alot of gas.  
 
 Point being, dont get your panties in a wad. 
 
 Yes, we need to have clean water to drink and clean air to breathe. 
 We have that... will continue to have it if we use our heads a 
 little. But, lets not over react as we did with the refrigerant 
 scandal a few years ago... Did you know for instance that the 
 replacement for R-12 & R-22 is carcinoginic? It is not as readily 
 broken down by sunlight as R-12 or R-22. Hmmm.
 
 THE SKY IS NOT FALLING, But the ecoweenies are closing off our land 
 and resources because they are afraid it is... Tropical forests, 
 because of the decaying vegetation on the forest floor use more 
 oxygen than they produce. A field of grass does a better job than a 
 forest in that regards. 
 For those of you that live in LA and see the air you breathe... the 
 reason you do is more a factor of geography than anything. When you 
 fart in LA it has no where to go. It is trapped by the mountains, 
 prevailing winds from the coast and you are stuck having no way for 
 it to disapate... it eventually falls to the ground, but you guys put 
 it up faster than it can fall out, because of your geography and 
 population density.
 
 The Kyoto agreement is fine, let the Japanese and Europeans work 
 towards keeping it up. Until all countries enforce it including china 
 it won't have any affect. Except on our economy. And when the next 
 big Volcano errupts, it will not have mattered anyhow. This old world 
 is going to survive us. It is rugged, it is hardy, it will be a great 
 place to live long after we quit.
 
 If you have read this far, I aplogize for the length but not the 
 content. Let's get back to bikes.
 Larry
 
			 
			
					
				environmental rant (nklr?)
				Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2001 8:55 am
				by Dan Oaks
				After reading your dissertation, I have come to the conclusion that it is
 imperative that we all get behind an initiative to pass legislation against
 farting in LA. Considering that it is against the law to smoke, eat, drink,
 weed whack, broil, drive ride, climb, fall, or otherwise have fun or
 accomplish anything in CA, I find it outrageous that we have overlooked this
 devastating contributor to the demise of the breathable atmosphere in LA and
 the innocent folks downwind in Phoenix.
 
 Let's all get together and contact our favorite BMW driving politician in
 CA. (I cleaned that one up)
 
 By the way, I'd like to thank all you environmentalists in CA for
 constructing even more clean electricity generating windmills outside Palm
 Springs and selling it all cheap to us folks in the East, even while you
 suffer rolling blackouts and sky-rocketing power costs. Real nice of you!
 I'm sure you have a plan, even though it eludes the rest of us. Just
 continue to sit in the dark out there and rant against power plants in your
 neighborhood, and eventually it'll dawn on you.
 
 --
 bierdo
 
 
 
 pudens@... wrote:
 
 
 > Don't hit send... don't do it... don't hit that dern button... they
 > dont want to read this... DONT!
 >
 > Alright guys, and the late Jennifer (girl of my dreams). This old
 > world has been rotating and spinning around the sun for quite some
 > time. When we say man made polution what we are referring to is stuff
 > that was here when we got here. Oh we have refined it and changed it
 > some, but IT was here long before we were. The fuel your bike runs
 > on, the plastic and rubber parts, the steel and aluminum have been
 > here affecting the environment for a long long time.
 >
 > When Mt. Pinatubo erupted it dumped more polutants into the world
 > environment than all industrial and vehicle emmissions AND aerosols
 > AND hydrochlorocarbons (freon) that have been produced since the
 > industrial revolution. Including 20 to 30 megatons of sulphur dioxide
 > and aerosols. The eruption of this volcano produced a large number of
 > micrometer-sized droplets (aerosols) of sulfuric acid which were
 > thrown into the stratosphere.  These particles eventually spread out
 > over the globe.  The very small droplets blocked energy coming from
 > the Sun, the result was that the Earth cooled off a little with about
 > a half degree centigrade. These volcanic droplets had also got some
 > other side effects, the particles catalyzed heterogeneous reactions
 > that were probably the cause of unusually low ozone levels.
 >      The particles were also the indirect cause of the destroying of
 > part of the sea-nature in the Gulf of Akaba (180km long, 25km wide,
 > 1.8km deep) because the droplets encouraged the growth of alga (which
 > is very harmful to the sea-nature). Emanations of gas can cause
 > immediate loss of life, 142 people were killed by carbon dioxide from
 > the Deng Plateau in Java. that's alot of gas.
 >
 > Point being, dont get your panties in a wad.
 >
 > Yes, we need to have clean water to drink and clean air to breathe.
 > We have that... will continue to have it if we use our heads a
 > little. But, lets not over react as we did with the refrigerant
 > scandal a few years ago... Did you know for instance that the
 > replacement for R-12 & R-22 is carcinoginic? It is not as readily
 > broken down by sunlight as R-12 or R-22. Hmmm.
 >
 > THE SKY IS NOT FALLING, But the ecoweenies are closing off our land
 > and resources because they are afraid it is... Tropical forests,
 > because of the decaying vegetation on the forest floor use more
 > oxygen than they produce. A field of grass does a better job than a
 > forest in that regards.
 > For those of you that live in LA and see the air you breathe... the
 > reason you do is more a factor of geography than anything. When you
 > fart in LA it has no where to go. It is trapped by the mountains,
 > prevailing winds from the coast and you are stuck having no way for
 > it to disapate... it eventually falls to the ground, but you guys put
 > it up faster than it can fall out, because of your geography and
 > population density.
 >
 > The Kyoto agreement is fine, let the Japanese and Europeans work
 > towards keeping it up. Until all countries enforce it including china
 > it won't have any affect. Except on our economy. And when the next
 > big Volcano errupts, it will not have mattered anyhow. This old world
 > is going to survive us. It is rugged, it is hardy, it will be a great
 > place to live long after we quit.
 >
 > If you have read this far, I aplogize for the length but not the
 > content. Let's get back to bikes.
 > Larry
 >
 > Visit the KLR650 archives at
 > 
http://www.listquest.com/lq/search.html?ln=klr650
 > Support Dual Sport News... dsneditor@...
 > Let's keep this list SPAM free!
 >
 > Visit our site at 
http://www.egroups.com/group/DSN_klr650
 > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 > 
DSN_klr650-unsubscribe@egroups.com
 >
 >
 > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to 
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 
  
--
 Dan (BIERDO) Oaks, President
 Formtech Services, Inc.
 
 '01 KLR650
 '99 DR650
 '82 XL250R
 '78 TC90
 '91 Yammy 4 stroke golf cart
 2 bad dogs and a sled
 
 Mfr. of Printing Equipment & Supplies
 formtech@...
 bierdo@...
 
http://www.formtechservices.com
 
 Mfr. of 4x4 POLY Motorcycle Parts
 bierdo@...
 
http://www.dirtly.com
 
 2970 Robins Nest Ct.
 Saint Cloud, FL 34772-8182 USA
 800 522-6257
 407 957-7887 (fax)
 
			 
			
					
				environmental rant (nklr?)
				Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2001 10:26 am
				by Swede
				Hallelujah and Amen, brother!! "Swede"
 
 
 --- In DSN_klr650@y..., pudens@t... wrote:
 > Alright guys, and the late Jennifer (girl of my dreams). This old 
 > world has been rotating and spinning around the sun for quite some 
 > time. When we say man made polution what we are referring to is 
 stuff 
 > that was here when we got here. Oh we have refined it and changed 
 it 
 > some, but IT was here long before we were. The fuel your bike runs 
 > on, the plastic and rubber parts, the steel and aluminum have been 
 > here affecting the environment for a long long time.
 >
 > Point being, dont get your panties in a wad. 
 > 
 > This old world 
 > is going to survive us. It is rugged, it is hardy, it will be a 
 great 
 > place to live long after we quit.
 > 
 > If you have read this far, I aplogize for the length but not the 
 > content. Let's get back to bikes.
 > Larry 
 
			 
			
					
				environmental rant (nklr?)
				Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2001 10:35 am
				by Swede
				It's all fun and game 'til someone can't have their cappuccino or 
 latte from Starbucks' industrial size electric coffee maker. 
 
 "Swede"   --- In DSN_klr650@y..., Dan Oaks  wrote:
  > By the way, I'd like to thank all you environmentalists in 
 CA for
 > constructing even more clean electricity generating windmills 
 outside Palm
 > Springs and selling it all cheap to us folks in the East, even 
 while you
 > suffer rolling blackouts and sky-rocketing power costs. Real nice 
 of you!
 > I'm sure you have a plan, even though it eludes the rest of us. Just
 > continue to sit in the dark out there and rant against power plants 
 in your
 > neighborhood, and eventually it'll dawn on you.
 > 
 > --
 > bierdo 
 
			 
			
				environmental rant (nklr?)
				Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2001 10:38 am
				by Robert T. Heywood
				Dude,
 I've heard this complacent reasoning before. It's bullshit. It took millions
 of years for the plant and animal species to evolve to, what was once, a
 beautiful diverse array of life. And several hundred years for man, including
 me I admit, to destroy it. We know a lot more now about how badly our
 ecosystem is being destroyed A hundred years ago we didn't. There is no
 excuse for complacency the data is known. This isn't religion. This is
 science. If you are content to hand a big ball of noxious dirt to future
 generations instead of a green and blue one, then I guess you voted for Idiot
 Boy (Bush).
 
 Hey, you said "rant".
 
 Swede wrote:
 
 
 > Hallelujah and Amen, brother!! "Swede"
 >
 > --- In DSN_klr650@y..., pudens@t... wrote:
 > > Alright guys, and the late Jennifer (girl of my dreams). This old
 > > world has been rotating and spinning around the sun for quite some
 > > time. When we say man made polution what we are referring to is
 > stuff
 > > that was here when we got here. Oh we have refined it and changed
 > it
 > > some, but IT was here long before we were. The fuel your bike runs
 > > on, the plastic and rubber parts, the steel and aluminum have been
 > > here affecting the environment for a long long time.
 > >
 > > Point being, dont get your panties in a wad.
 > >
 > > This old world
 > > is going to survive us. It is rugged, it is hardy, it will be a
 > great
 > > place to live long after we quit.
 > >
 > > If you have read this far, I aplogize for the length but not the
 > > content. Let's get back to bikes.
 > > Larry
 >
 > Visit the KLR650 archives at
 > 
http://www.listquest.com/lq/search.html?ln=klr650
 > Support Dual Sport News... dsneditor@...
 > Let's keep this list SPAM free!
 >
 > Visit our site at 
http://www.egroups.com/group/DSN_klr650
 > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 > 
DSN_klr650-unsubscribe@egroups.com
 >
 >
 > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to 
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
 
			 
			
				environmental rant (nklr?)
				Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2001 11:42 am
				by Swede
				One cannot have good data when one has started taking it in the 
 middle or end of the experiment. Only half of the data is given, 
 and no one knows the true baseline. If information is only doled 
 out half way, it can be manipulated any way you want. I'm tired 
 of hearing someone yell FIRE in the opera house.
 
 When one sided, miguided "science" is preached from the pulpit of 
 misdirection - it becomes religion to the uninformed. 
 
 "Swede"
 
 
 --- In DSN_klr650@y..., "Robert T. Heywood"  wrote:
 > We know a lot more now about how badly our
 > ecosystem is being destroyed A hundred years ago we didn't. There 
 is no
 > excuse for complacency the data is known. This isn't religion. This 
 is
 > science. 
 
			 
			
				environmental rant (nklr?)
				Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2001 11:58 am
				by Juan Carlos Ibarra
				You got it all wrong dude. Environmental problems are not the problems of
 the Earth, they are the problems of man. Of course the Earth can regenerate,
 it has millions of years to do that. The issue lies elsewhere.
 
 To me it is very obvious that what you say makes sense to an American (most
 likley caucasian) male, with enough dough to buy motorcycles. But it is
 meaningless to more than 80 percent of the world's population. We tend to
 think that man is the only animal that reasons, but I object that. I say we
 are not reasonable. If we were, would we live like we do? Give it some
 thought, dude, be honest. Is it reasonable to clear cut a forest? Honestly,
 think about that. Is there a good reason to destroy hundreds of species a
 year because we absolutely need mahogany furniture in our living room?  Come
 on, man. When we damage the environment we damage Earth temporarily, but we
 damage ourselves permanently.
 
 We are spoiling beauty, dude, that is IMHO the only true mortal sin.
 
 Juan
 
 
 
 
 ----- Original Message -----
 From: 
 To: DSN_klr650@yahoogroups.com>
 Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2001 8:19 AM
 Subject: [DSN_klr650] Environmental rant (NKLR?)
 
 
 > Don't hit send... don't do it... don't hit that dern button... they
 > dont want to read this... DONT!
 >
 > Alright guys, and the late Jennifer (girl of my dreams). This old
 > world has been rotating and spinning around the sun for quite some
 > time. When we say man made polution what we are referring to is stuff
 > that was here when we got here. Oh we have refined it and changed it
 > some, but IT was here long before we were. The fuel your bike runs
 > on, the plastic and rubber parts, the steel and aluminum have been
 > here affecting the environment for a long long time.
 >
 > When Mt. Pinatubo erupted it dumped more polutants into the world
 > environment than all industrial and vehicle emmissions AND aerosols
 > AND hydrochlorocarbons (freon) that have been produced since the
 > industrial revolution. Including 20 to 30 megatons of sulphur dioxide
 > and aerosols. The eruption of this volcano produced a large number of
 > micrometer-sized droplets (aerosols) of sulfuric acid which were
 > thrown into the stratosphere.  These particles eventually spread out
 > over the globe.  The very small droplets blocked energy coming from
 > the Sun, the result was that the Earth cooled off a little with about
 > a half degree centigrade. These volcanic droplets had also got some
 > other side effects, the particles catalyzed heterogeneous reactions
 > that were probably the cause of unusually low ozone levels.
 >      The particles were also the indirect cause of the destroying of
 > part of the sea-nature in the Gulf of Akaba (180km long, 25km wide,
 > 1.8km deep) because the droplets encouraged the growth of alga (which
 > is very harmful to the sea-nature). Emanations of gas can cause
 > immediate loss of life, 142 people were killed by carbon dioxide from
 > the Deng Plateau in Java. that's alot of gas.
 >
 > Point being, dont get your panties in a wad.
 >
 > Yes, we need to have clean water to drink and clean air to breathe.
 > We have that... will continue to have it if we use our heads a
 > little. But, lets not over react as we did with the refrigerant
 > scandal a few years ago... Did you know for instance that the
 > replacement for R-12 & R-22 is carcinoginic? It is not as readily
 > broken down by sunlight as R-12 or R-22. Hmmm.
 >
 > THE SKY IS NOT FALLING, But the ecoweenies are closing off our land
 > and resources because they are afraid it is... Tropical forests,
 > because of the decaying vegetation on the forest floor use more
 > oxygen than they produce. A field of grass does a better job than a
 > forest in that regards.
 > For those of you that live in LA and see the air you breathe... the
 > reason you do is more a factor of geography than anything. When you
 > fart in LA it has no where to go. It is trapped by the mountains,
 > prevailing winds from the coast and you are stuck having no way for
 > it to disapate... it eventually falls to the ground, but you guys put
 > it up faster than it can fall out, because of your geography and
 > population density.
 >
 > The Kyoto agreement is fine, let the Japanese and Europeans work
 > towards keeping it up. Until all countries enforce it including china
 > it won't have any affect. Except on our economy. And when the next
 > big Volcano errupts, it will not have mattered anyhow. This old world
 > is going to survive us. It is rugged, it is hardy, it will be a great
 > place to live long after we quit.
 >
 > If you have read this far, I aplogize for the length but not the
 > content. Let's get back to bikes.
 > Larry
 >
 >
 > Visit the KLR650 archives at
 > 
http://www.listquest.com/lq/search.html?ln=klr650
 > Support Dual Sport News... dsneditor@...
 > Let's keep this list SPAM free!
 >
 > Visit our site at 
http://www.egroups.com/group/DSN_klr650
 > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 > 
DSN_klr650-unsubscribe@egroups.com
 >
 >
 > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to 
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 >
 > 
 
			 
			
				environmental rant (nklr?)
				Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2001 4:25 pm
				by wayne adamson
				Your right on Juan,but your wasting your breath. Humans will eventually go
 the way of the dinosar and we are speeding that up by overpopulating the
 planet. If we obsess on this we will go crazy,so we just have to do what we
 can and live our lives. Think globally-act locally    .Wayne
 
 ----- Original Message -----
 From: Juan Carlos Ibarra 
 To: ; DSN_klr650@yahoogroups.com>
 Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2001 9:06 PM
 Subject: RE: [DSN_klr650] Environmental rant (NKLR?)
 
 
 > You got it all wrong dude. Environmental problems are not the problems of
 > the Earth, they are the problems of man. Of course the Earth can
 regenerate,
 > it has millions of years to do that. The issue lies elsewhere.
 >
 > To me it is very obvious that what you say makes sense to an American
 (most
 > likley caucasian) male, with enough dough to buy motorcycles. But it is
 > meaningless to more than 80 percent of the world's population. We tend to
 > think that man is the only animal that reasons, but I object that. I say
 we
 > are not reasonable. If we were, would we live like we do? Give it some
 > thought, dude, be honest. Is it reasonable to clear cut a forest?
 Honestly,
 > think about that. Is there a good reason to destroy hundreds of species a
 > year because we absolutely need mahogany furniture in our living room?
 Come
 > on, man. When we damage the environment we damage Earth temporarily, but
 we
 > damage ourselves permanently.
 >
 > We are spoiling beauty, dude, that is IMHO the only true mortal sin.
 >
 > Juan 
 
			 
			
				environmental rant (nklr?)
				Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2001 11:06 pm
				by Dan Oaks
				Swede wrote:
 
 
 > One cannot have good data when one has started taking it in the
 > middle or end of the experiment. Only half of the data is given,
 > and no one knows the true baseline. If information is only doled
 > out half way, it can be manipulated any way you want. I'm tired
 > of hearing someone yell FIRE in the opera house.
 >
 > When one sided, miguided "science" is preached from the pulpit of
 > misdirection - it becomes religion to the uninformed.
 >
 > "Swede"
 
  
Here, here!
 
 Good'n, Swede!
 
 --
 bierdo
 
 We get our morals from books. I didn t get mine from books, but I know that
 morals do come from books theoretically, at least.     -- Mark Twain
 
			 
			
				environmental rant (nklr?)
				Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2001 11:17 pm
				by Dan Oaks
				It is only human . . . to shit in one's own bed.
 --
 bierdo
 
 Juan Carlos Ibarra wrote:
 
 
 > You got it all wrong dude. Environmental problems are not the problems of
 > the Earth, they are the problems of man. Of course the Earth can regenerate,
 > it has millions of years to do that. The issue lies elsewhere.
 >
 > To me it is very obvious that what you say makes sense to an American (most
 > likley caucasian) male, with enough dough to buy motorcycles. But it is
 > meaningless to more than 80 percent of the world's population. We tend to
 > think that man is the only animal that reasons, but I object that. I say we
 > are not reasonable. If we were, would we live like we do? Give it some
 > thought, dude, be honest. Is it reasonable to clear cut a forest? Honestly,
 > think about that. Is there a good reason to destroy hundreds of species a
 > year because we absolutely need mahogany furniture in our living room?  Come
 > on, man. When we damage the environment we damage Earth temporarily, but we
 > damage ourselves permanently.
 >
 > We are spoiling beauty, dude, that is IMHO the only true mortal sin.
 >
 > Juan
 >