Page 1 of 3
					
				f650gs vs. klr650 according to city bike  nklr
				Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2001 10:31 pm
				by k650dsn@aol.com
				I just read the City Bike review of the BMW F650GS.  One line from 
 the article sums it up well.  "In a bar room fight with a KLR650, the 
 F650GS wouldn't stand a chance."
 
 Gino
 
			 
			
					
				f650gs vs. klr650 according to city bike  nklr
				Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2001 7:42 am
				by Toby 'Slide' Lampson
				What does that mean?
 
 k650dsn@... wrote:
 
 
 
			 
			
					
				f650gs vs. klr650 according to city bike  nklr
				Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2001 9:07 am
				by k650dsn@aol.com
				--- In DSN_klr650@y..., Toby 'Slide' Lampson  wrote:
 
 > What does that mean?
 > 
 > k650dsn@a... wrote:
 > 
 > > I just read the City Bike review of the BMW F650GS.  One line from
 > > the article sums it up well.  "In a bar room fight with a KLR650, 
  
the
 
 > > F650GS wouldn't stand a chance."
 > >
 > > Gino
 
  
City Bike riders seem to have a rather creative way of writing (as do 
 most CA residents 

 )  but I would say that what they meant was, 
 that while the F650GS would look chic next to your Audi TT, it would 
 not hold up in the real world like a KLR650 would.
 
 Gino
 
			 
			
					
				f650gs vs. klr650 according to city bike  nklr
				Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2001 10:29 am
				by jesbo@aol.com
				In a message dated 2/14/01 7:08:17 AM Pacific Standard Time, k650dsn@... 
 writes:
 
 
 > 
 >  City Bike riders seem to have a rather creative way of writing (as do 
 >  most CA residents 

 )  but I would say that what they meant was, 
 >  that while the F650GS would look chic next to your Audi TT, it would 
 >  not hold up in the real world like a KLR650 would.
 >  
 >  Gino
 >  
 
  
Hey Gino,
 If your talking current year F650GS, I think you're probably right.  They've 
 got "issues" so to speak. But I wouldn't sell the BMW F650 short.  The older 
 ones have made their trek to Prudhoe Bay and other such insane places with 
 great results. And the last I heard, Benka was still riding hers around the 
 world.  I believe when they get the kinks ironed out of this new GS it will 
 be a fine machine in every respect.
 
 Having said that, I choose a KLR over the F650 for the same reason a lot of 
 folks do; money!  Dollar for dollar, the KLR comes out the winner.  A late 
 model used KLR at $3500-$4000 or a used F650 at $5500-$6500?  And let's face 
 it, if you're going adventure touring, which bike would you rather have to 
 fix after a drop?  A quick estimate of some very minor paint damage from a 
 tip over on my BMW K1100LT came out to over $500.  Right now we can replace 
 every piece of plastic, including the tank, on a KLR for $500.
 
 There's been a raging debate within the BMW community from the day the F650 
 was introduced as to whether or not it was a "real" BMW.  For me, that's best 
 answered this way.  I was having some maintenance done on my K11 one 
 beautiful summer's day, hanging around the parking lot of the dealership, 
 killing time.  I watched as three BMW riders loaded up and headed out on a 
 little adventure that would take them from Virginia to California and back 
 with a number of side trips along the way.  It occurred to me as they 
 disappeared down the road, the average age of those bikes was around 25 
 years...  When, or should I say if, the new F650 manages to rack up this kind 
 of history, then it will truly be a BMW.
 
 In the meantime, the KLR puts a smile on my face, doesn't cost big bucks, and 
 has a dammed good reputation to boot!  Who knows what we'll all be riding 25 
 years from now? I'll be 85 then; maybe one of those motorized scooters, 
 zipping up and down the halls of the old soldier's home.
 
 Cheers,
 Jess Booth
 Odenton, MD
 K11LT 
 KLR650
 
			 
			
					
				f650gs vs. klr650 according to city bike  nklr
				Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2001 11:26 am
				by Toby 'Slide' Lampson
				They must not be looking much farther than 'chic'.
 Or perhaps they're just impressed by the tractor-like-panache
 of a KLR.
 
 I wonder how they'd rate a bar fight between a
 GS1150 and a Harley?
 
 k650dsn@... wrote:
 
 
 > --- In DSN_klr650@y..., Toby 'Slide' Lampson  wrote:
 > > What does that mean?
 > >
 > > k650dsn@a... wrote:
 > >
 > > > I just read the City Bike review of the BMW F650GS.  One line from
 > > > the article sums it up well.  "In a bar room fight with a KLR650,
 > the
 > > > F650GS wouldn't stand a chance."
 > > >
 > > > Gino
 >
 > City Bike riders seem to have a rather creative way of writing (as do
 > most CA residents 

 )  but I would say that what they meant was,
 > that while the F650GS would look chic next to your Audi TT, it would
 > not hold up in the real world like a KLR650 would.
 >
 > Gino 
 
			 
			
					
				f650gs vs. klr650 according to city bike  nklr
				Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2001 11:49 am
				by msfaul@digisys.net
				--- In DSN_klr650@y..., k650dsn@a... wrote:
 
 > I just read the City Bike review of the BMW F650GS.  One line from 
 > the article sums it up well.  "In a bar room fight with a KLR650, 
  
the 
 
 > F650GS wouldn't stand a chance."
 > 
 > Gino
 
 
 
  
     I can`t speak for the GS model, but I have to disagree in 
 reference to the Dakar model. Regardless of my past comments on the 
 Dakar model, I have since rode a 2001 model,and as much as I hate to 
 admit it, and can`t believe I would ever buy a $7000+ motorcycle, I 
 will be buying a Dakar model this week. Mine didn`t have any of the 
 problems associated with the 2000 models and rides and handles much 
 better than I exspected. A big plus for me is with the GS seat 
 installed, I`m at the same seat height as on my KLR with the custom 
 seat and lowered triple clamps, which really reduced my front tire 
 clearance and skid plate clearance. This has always been a problem 
 for me with the KLR on single track. Not so with the Dakar, with a 
 lower CG and more suspension travel. Considerably more available 
 wattage, more horsepower, not to mention an engine that if it holds 
 up to every other Rotax, will be rock solid reliable. I still have 
 concerns with fuel injection on a bike like this, but I`m willing to 
 try it.
     I plan on keeping my KLR and will spend the next season comparing 
 them side by side. I love my KLR and will be the first to admit any 
 drawbacks to the Dakar.We`ll see. 
 
 Skip
 
			 
			
					
				f650gs vs. klr650 according to city bike  nklr
				Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2001 12:03 pm
				by msfaul@digisys.net
				> 
 > City Bike riders seem to have a rather creative way of writing (as 
  
do 
 
 > most CA residents 

 )  but I would say that what they meant was, 
 > that while the F650GS would look chic next to your Audi TT, it 
  
would 
 
 > not hold up in the real world like a KLR650 would.
 > 
 > Gino
 
  
 
  
  If the KLR had the frame construction and design of the 
 F650GS/Dakar, especially the rectangular tube subframe, we`d all be 
 better off. Super rigid and light. But how it holds up remains to be 
 seen.
 
   Skip
 
			 
			
					
				f650gs vs. klr650 according to city bike  nklr
				Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2001 12:20 pm
				by monahanwb@yahoo.com
				--- In DSN_klr650@y..., Toby 'Slide' Lampson  wrote:
 
 > What does that mean?
  
"In a bar room fight with a KLR650, the
 
 > > F650GS wouldn't stand a chance."
 
  
Specifically, I believe it means that while the F650GS can barely 
 find its way to the ladies room, the KLR can stand on the bar after 
 swilling a pitcher of stout and piss into a bar glass without 
 spilling one drop.
 
			 
			
					
				f650gs vs. klr650 according to city bike  nklr
				Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2001 12:25 pm
				by Swede
				--- In DSN_klr650@y..., k650dsn@a... wrote:
 
 > I just read the City Bike review of the BMW F650GS.  One line from 
 > the article sums it up well.  "In a bar room fight with a KLR650, 
  
the 
 
 > F650GS wouldn't stand a chance."
 > 
 > Gino
 
  
In my humble opinion, comparing these two is like comparing a 
 '75 Chevy Blazer to a new Mercedes SUV - which one costs less, 
 which one would you be more comfortable taking off road, which 
 one can be modified easiest, what's the parts availability? 
 
 Personally, I'd have more fun in the Blazer - At the beach or 
 in the mountains, top and doors off, and a horse of Coors in 
 the back. "Swede" 
 
			 
			
					
				f650gs vs. klr650 according to city bike  nklr
				Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2001 1:37 pm
				by Toby 'Slide' Lampson
				I for one would love to hear of your discoveries as you go.
 
 At the moment the Dakar is the one in adventure touring to
 lead us out of the KLR era....especially for average to smaller
 sized riders. You mention most of the reasons why.
 When you add a fuel injection(that functions) it provides a
 whole new dimension for the bike. The bike has
 stability, economy, power, and handling......all better than a KLR.
 
 I've got a new hunch about the future.
 I think once all these guys on 1100s find out how good
 these 650's are.....there gonna trade in their bikes.
 Simply because(exlcuding two up or cross country marathons)
 the 650 will do anything the larger bikes will do
 and you'll have more fun doing it.......
 
 'Mark my words, this basic 650 is the SUB of the future.....'  -Slide
 If not, its a good foundation.
 The LC8 or new light V-twins may rival it but they
 won't beat it in a versatility sense.
 This is simply because, you have a bike with (1)economy(50mpg min),
 that will (2)goat trail AND (3)tour.
 You won't find 'all' these elements in the coming light V-Twins.
 
 Going smaller.....the closest thing is the XR category.
 these are for weekenders who want to go rugged.
 The Dakar is for weekenders who wanna go luxury, or Tour......
 Going larger?.......I'd buy an aircraft for the same money.
 
 Slide out-
 
 msfaul@... wrote:
 
 
 > --- In DSN_klr650@y..., k650dsn@a... wrote:
 > > I just read the City Bike review of the BMW F650GS.  One line from
 > > the article sums it up well.  "In a bar room fight with a KLR650,
 > the
 > > F650GS wouldn't stand a chance."
 > >
 > > Gino
 >
 >      I can`t speak for the GS model, but I have to disagree in
 > reference to the Dakar model. Regardless of my past comments on the
 > Dakar model, I have since rode a 2001 model,and as much as I hate to
 > admit it, and can`t believe I would ever buy a $7000+ motorcycle, I
 > will be buying a Dakar model this week. Mine didn`t have any of the
 > problems associated with the 2000 models and rides and handles much
 > better than I exspected. A big plus for me is with the GS seat
 > installed, I`m at the same seat height as on my KLR with the custom
 > seat and lowered triple clamps, which really reduced my front tire
 > clearance and skid plate clearance. This has always been a problem
 > for me with the KLR on single track. Not so with the Dakar, with a
 > lower CG and more suspension travel. Considerably more available
 > wattage, more horsepower, not to mention an engine that if it holds
 > up to every other Rotax, will be rock solid reliable. I still have
 > concerns with fuel injection on a bike like this, but I`m willing to
 > try it.
 >     I plan on keeping my KLR and will spend the next season comparing
 > them side by side. I love my KLR and will be the first to admit any
 > drawbacks to the Dakar.We`ll see.
 >
 > Skip
 >
 > Visit the KLR650 archives at
 > 
http://www.listquest.com/lq/search.html?ln=klr650
 > Support Dual Sport News... dsneditor@...
 > Let's keep this list SPAM free!
 >
 > Visit our site at 
http://www.egroups.com/group/DSN_klr650
 > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 > 
DSN_klr650-unsubscribe@egroups.com