paging the list admin

[roncriswell@sbcglobal.net]

Stu, loud tires saves lives. That should be our KLR slogan. Criswell

On Sep 3, 2010, at 11:09 AM, SM wrote:   --- In DSN_KLR650%40yahoogroups.com, "Fred Hink" wrote: > > What do you think of this? > http://www.amadirectlink.com/news/story.asp?id=2072 > > Fred > www.arrowheadmotorsports.com > Another costly, redundant, unnecessary law foisted upon us Californians by a legislator that is out completely of touch with reality. (insert curse filled angry rant here) I am no fan of loud pipes, but I think the issue this bill is trying to address can be easily addressed by laws already on the books. We don't need more legislation, just better application of the laws already in existence. I tried to get my point across by writing a letter to the governor using this link: http://capwiz.com/amacycle/issues/alert/?alertid=16039911&queueid=[capwiz:queue_id] Cal Posse to the Governor's desk inbox, stat! Thanks CA Stu A13

[skypilot110]

The stickers are a fools game since people could just alter the factory baffles anyways. The police need to buy some db meters. Pull over anybody with a loud pipe, test with the db meter and either impound the bike or ticket the rider. Heck they can drag the bikes to the impound lot with a chain tied to the frame for all I care, I hate loud pipes There are already sufficient laws. The cops just dont enforce them. Chris

--- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, RobertWichert wrote: >I personally support the sound test, but not the sticker. But I WILL have some stickers for sale later. > > Robert P. Wichert P.Eng

[David Critchley]

A concept as far-reaching as this needs a lot of thought. Once committed it is usually either very difficult or impossible to return. Personally speaking I rather appreciate the class of ideas from the various directions, and this idea at first glance seems to be a cure for a non-existent disease. Of course, I have been wrong before, and I might be on this. I have an automatic reaction to wholesale change coming as a cure for all ills, right out of right, (or left), field. What are the problems with the status quo? And what are the actual benefits of making things extremely tidy? Just my 2 cents. DC D Critchley

On 07/09/2010 09:28, k650@... wrote:   My first thought is that it is so unorganized that any attempt to rework it should be welcomed. My second thought is I hope Fred thinks the same as me (and you). Walt