klr super plug

[Rick McCauley]

My Bad. Please forgive me. It won't happen again Rick A17

--- On Thu, 9/10/09, Jeff Khoury wrote: From: Jeff Khoury Subject: Re: [DSN_KLR650] Re: My '08 at 14,000mi To: "Rick McCauley" Cc: "dsn klr650" dsn_klr650@yahoogroups.com> Date: Thursday, September 10, 2009, 12:52 PM Rick, How DARE you use logic and applied mathematics in a motorcycle discussion forum? Posts here are all supposed to be subjective and packed with unverifiable assertions! FOR SHAME! -Jeff Khoury ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rick McCauley" To: "dsn klr650" Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2009 10:33:51 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific Subject: Re: [DSN_KLR650] Re: My '08 at 14,000mi Don't forget that the front sprocket turns 3 times for every 1 turn of the rear one. actually 2.93 times in your case. Rick A17 --- On Thu, 9/10/09, spike55_bmw < spike55_bmw@ yahoo.com > wrote: Again, because of the chain issue, I'm changing out the gears and chain. Will post pics but the front OEM 15T sprocket wore more heavily than the JT 44T rear with nearly the same mileage on both. Don R100, A6F [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[judjonzz]

--- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, "notanymoore" wrote:

> > The KLR is pretty forgiving on chain maintenance, if you stay on-road. I can't recommend WD40. But any old chain lube seems to do OK otherwise. The engine is relatively low power so the stress on the chain is not high unless you haul a heavy load or do a lot of off-road.

I'd be curious to hear how long your chains last on "any old chain lube".

[davharv]

I'm at about 65-70K on the one it came with new, so that must be good enough.

--- In DSN_KLR650@yahoogroups.com, Rick McCauley wrote: > > What spark plug works best in the KLR? > Stock, or some super plug like a platinum, or iridium. > Why would one be better than the other, and is it good enough to > justify the extra cost? > > Rick > A17 > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >